<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shyamalan&#8217;s The Village: Ch-ch-ch-ch-Changes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://screenrant.com/shyamalans-the-village-ch-ch-ch-ch-changes-vic-65/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://screenrant.com/shyamalans-the-village-ch-ch-ch-ch-changes-vic-65/</link>
	<description>TV and Movie News, Reviews &#38; Trailers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 14:22:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/>	<item>
		<title>By: Vic</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/shyamalans-the-village-ch-ch-ch-ch-changes-vic-65/comment-page-1/#comment-161</link>
		<dc:creator>Vic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2004 18:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/shyamalans-the-village-ch-ch-ch-ch-changes-65/#comment-161</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the correction as to who divulged the ending.

Vic
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the correction as to who divulged the ending.</p>
<p>Vic</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Facer</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/shyamalans-the-village-ch-ch-ch-ch-changes-vic-65/comment-page-1/#comment-160</link>
		<dc:creator>The Facer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2004 20:33:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/shyamalans-the-village-ch-ch-ch-ch-changes-65/#comment-160</guid>
		<description>It wasn&#039;t Knowles who outed the ending, it was his lady-in-waiting, Drew McWeeny AKA &quot;Moriarty.&quot;  Hopefully this will blow whatever minor amounts of street cred McWeeny had with Hollywood, and seal his fate as a permanent member of the Former Video Store Rental Clerks Union.  McWeeny should be held accountable somehow for this travesty.  An alternative would be to legalize nightstick sodomization....
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It wasn&#8217;t Knowles who outed the ending, it was his lady-in-waiting, Drew McWeeny AKA &#8220;Moriarty.&#8221;  Hopefully this will blow whatever minor amounts of street cred McWeeny had with Hollywood, and seal his fate as a permanent member of the Former Video Store Rental Clerks Union.  McWeeny should be held accountable somehow for this travesty.  An alternative would be to legalize nightstick sodomization&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/shyamalans-the-village-ch-ch-ch-ch-changes-vic-65/comment-page-1/#comment-159</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2004 19:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/shyamalans-the-village-ch-ch-ch-ch-changes-65/#comment-159</guid>
		<description>It would take Shyamalan quite a bit of reshooting to surpass the all-time king of reshoots, Stanley Kubrick.  Besides, do we even know for sure that The Village will have a surprise twist ending?  Shyamalan&#039;s last film, Signs, didn&#039;t.  The reshoot could just be to correct an inaccuracy or inconsistency.

Even if Harry Knowles has &quot;pull&quot; in Hollywood (which I&#039;m not quite ready to concede he does), I wouldn&#039;t want my legacy to be one of forcing filmmakers to keep reshooting scenes because I couldn&#039;t keep my mouth shut.  I wonder why the studios don&#039;t sue people who leak confidential information like that.  They had no problem taking action against the people who pirated The Hulk and the Oscar screeners.  Not the same thing, I know, but still...

Brian
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would take Shyamalan quite a bit of reshooting to surpass the all-time king of reshoots, Stanley Kubrick.  Besides, do we even know for sure that The Village will have a surprise twist ending?  Shyamalan&#8217;s last film, Signs, didn&#8217;t.  The reshoot could just be to correct an inaccuracy or inconsistency.</p>
<p>Even if Harry Knowles has &#8220;pull&#8221; in Hollywood (which I&#8217;m not quite ready to concede he does), I wouldn&#8217;t want my legacy to be one of forcing filmmakers to keep reshooting scenes because I couldn&#8217;t keep my mouth shut.  I wonder why the studios don&#8217;t sue people who leak confidential information like that.  They had no problem taking action against the people who pirated The Hulk and the Oscar screeners.  Not the same thing, I know, but still&#8230;</p>
<p>Brian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

