<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shrek Forever After Teaser Trailer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://screenrant.com/shrek-forever-after-teaser-trailer-kofi-38481/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://screenrant.com/shrek-forever-after-teaser-trailer-kofi-38481/</link>
	<description>TV and Movie News, Reviews &#38; Trailers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 02:06:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Shrek Forever After Trailer - Screen Rant</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/shrek-forever-after-teaser-trailer-kofi-38481/comment-page-1/#comment-180042</link>
		<dc:creator>Shrek Forever After Trailer - Screen Rant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 16:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=38481#comment-180042</guid>
		<description>[...] the initial teaser trailer we now have a full trailer for the fourth film in the popular Shrek franchise, entitled Shrek [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the initial teaser trailer we now have a full trailer for the fourth film in the popular Shrek franchise, entitled Shrek [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Shrek Forever After Trailer &#124; Lair of the Green Knight</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/shrek-forever-after-teaser-trailer-kofi-38481/comment-page-1/#comment-163998</link>
		<dc:creator>New Shrek Forever After Trailer &#124; Lair of the Green Knight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 16:11:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=38481#comment-163998</guid>
		<description>[...] Shrek Forever After Teaser Trailer (screenrant.com) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Shrek Forever After Teaser Trailer (screenrant.com) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cyn</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/shrek-forever-after-teaser-trailer-kofi-38481/comment-page-1/#comment-163820</link>
		<dc:creator>Cyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 00:04:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=38481#comment-163820</guid>
		<description>I also liked the 2nd one better than the first.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also liked the 2nd one better than the first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the old man</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/shrek-forever-after-teaser-trailer-kofi-38481/comment-page-1/#comment-163515</link>
		<dc:creator>the old man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 05:59:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=38481#comment-163515</guid>
		<description>Hey Neontiger check http://teaser-trailer.com/
Does anything work there or are you just an Apple polisher?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Neontiger check <a href="http://teaser-trailer.com/" rel="nofollow">http://teaser-trailer.com/</a><br />
Does anything work there or are you just an Apple polisher?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eliza</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/shrek-forever-after-teaser-trailer-kofi-38481/comment-page-1/#comment-163185</link>
		<dc:creator>Eliza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 07:38:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=38481#comment-163185</guid>
		<description>I really liked the first two movies. And I love the characters. I would probably see it, even if it doesn&#039;t turn out to be that good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really liked the first two movies. And I love the characters. I would probably see it, even if it doesn&#8217;t turn out to be that good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fenix</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/shrek-forever-after-teaser-trailer-kofi-38481/comment-page-1/#comment-163102</link>
		<dc:creator>Fenix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 00:25:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=38481#comment-163102</guid>
		<description>I have only seen the first one and I loved it but this franchise just looks like its loosing steam.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have only seen the first one and I loved it but this franchise just looks like its loosing steam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neontiger21</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/shrek-forever-after-teaser-trailer-kofi-38481/comment-page-1/#comment-163101</link>
		<dc:creator>neontiger21</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 00:14:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=38481#comment-163101</guid>
		<description>Wow. This looks terrible, just like the third. There is no way I am going to see this.
Thanks so much for how you&#039;ve recently started giving links for the trailers though, screenrant! The embedded videos will never work on my computer so this makes me very happy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. This looks terrible, just like the third. There is no way I am going to see this.<br />
Thanks so much for how you&#8217;ve recently started giving links for the trailers though, screenrant! The embedded videos will never work on my computer so this makes me very happy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/shrek-forever-after-teaser-trailer-kofi-38481/comment-page-1/#comment-163083</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 23:25:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=38481#comment-163083</guid>
		<description>The reviews would have to blow me out of the water.  Otherwise you would have to pay me to see it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reviews would have to blow me out of the water.  Otherwise you would have to pay me to see it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: twistedburton</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/shrek-forever-after-teaser-trailer-kofi-38481/comment-page-1/#comment-163080</link>
		<dc:creator>twistedburton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 23:22:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=38481#comment-163080</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll probably see this, but I&#039;m not overly impressed with it at all. The third one was terrible. The first was great. The second wasn&#039;t bad. This one looks like a steaming cow pie. They should have stopped when they were ahead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll probably see this, but I&#8217;m not overly impressed with it at all. The third one was terrible. The first was great. The second wasn&#8217;t bad. This one looks like a steaming cow pie. They should have stopped when they were ahead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy S</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/shrek-forever-after-teaser-trailer-kofi-38481/comment-page-1/#comment-163076</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 23:19:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=38481#comment-163076</guid>
		<description>I liked the trailer and I think that this is going to be better than Shrek the Third. True, the first 2 are classics, but I do like the characters in these films, so it&#039;ll be interesting (to me anyways) how this turns out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I liked the trailer and I think that this is going to be better than Shrek the Third. True, the first 2 are classics, but I do like the characters in these films, so it&#8217;ll be interesting (to me anyways) how this turns out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Magnus</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/shrek-forever-after-teaser-trailer-kofi-38481/comment-page-1/#comment-163066</link>
		<dc:creator>Magnus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 22:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=38481#comment-163066</guid>
		<description>this is the kind of animated movie that can go on and on and on and on! just fix a bit with the characters, the story, and whosh u have a brand new animated movie!

and it will always be an entertaining movie for youngsters and the family and  most likely make good money so they wont ever have to stop... yaaaaaaaaay
oh well:\</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is the kind of animated movie that can go on and on and on and on! just fix a bit with the characters, the story, and whosh u have a brand new animated movie!</p>
<p>and it will always be an entertaining movie for youngsters and the family and  most likely make good money so they wont ever have to stop&#8230; yaaaaaaaaay<br />
oh well:\</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshi</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/shrek-forever-after-teaser-trailer-kofi-38481/comment-page-1/#comment-163044</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 22:12:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=38481#comment-163044</guid>
		<description>&quot;Voice work will be done by Mike Myers, Cameron Diaz, Eddie Murphy, Antonio Banderas, Julie Andrews, Justin Timberlake, Jon Hamm, Maya Rudolph, Amy Sedaris, Larry King, Regis Philbin, and Kathy Griffin.&quot;

Because getting people who can actually enunciate is much less important than putting names on a marquee. *sigh*.

I agree with you Kofi, they should have stopped at 2. I personally think the first one is better, but did love the second and hardly cracked a smile in the third. This one... the trailer just confused me more than anything, nothing about it was funny as far as I could see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Voice work will be done by Mike Myers, Cameron Diaz, Eddie Murphy, Antonio Banderas, Julie Andrews, Justin Timberlake, Jon Hamm, Maya Rudolph, Amy Sedaris, Larry King, Regis Philbin, and Kathy Griffin.&#8221;</p>
<p>Because getting people who can actually enunciate is much less important than putting names on a marquee. *sigh*.</p>
<p>I agree with you Kofi, they should have stopped at 2. I personally think the first one is better, but did love the second and hardly cracked a smile in the third. This one&#8230; the trailer just confused me more than anything, nothing about it was funny as far as I could see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

