<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Screen Rant Server Upgrade</title>
	<atom:link href="http://screenrant.com/screen-rant-server-upgrade-vic-1304/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://screenrant.com/screen-rant-server-upgrade-vic-1304/</link>
	<description>TV and Movie News, Reviews &#38; Trailers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:33:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Vic</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/screen-rant-server-upgrade-vic-1304/comment-page-1/#comment-10399</link>
		<dc:creator>Vic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 13:29:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/screen-rant-server-upgrade-1304/#comment-10399</guid>
		<description>Hap,

LOL, dude... EXACTLY. You think they would have known to do that. Unfortunately although I&#039;m somewhat computer savvy, I wasn&#039;t aware of that little trick.

I&#039;m angry that THEY didn&#039;t employ it. :-\

Vic
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hap,</p>
<p>LOL, dude&#8230; EXACTLY. You think they would have known to do that. Unfortunately although I&#8217;m somewhat computer savvy, I wasn&#8217;t aware of that little trick.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m angry that THEY didn&#8217;t employ it. :-\</p>
<p>Vic</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hap</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/screen-rant-server-upgrade-vic-1304/comment-page-1/#comment-10398</link>
		<dc:creator>hap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 06:02:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/screen-rant-server-upgrade-1304/#comment-10398</guid>
		<description>Very odd.  Isn&#039;t it normal operating procedure to decrease your DNS TTL to almost nothing and wait out the current TTL to avoid these very issues?  I&#039;d definitely agree a change of hosting companies is in order if they&#039;re unwilling to do it.  However, if you have control over your domain and have access to a registry that allows you to make your own DNS entries, you could certainly circumvent their approach.




</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very odd.  Isn&#8217;t it normal operating procedure to decrease your DNS TTL to almost nothing and wait out the current TTL to avoid these very issues?  I&#8217;d definitely agree a change of hosting companies is in order if they&#8217;re unwilling to do it.  However, if you have control over your domain and have access to a registry that allows you to make your own DNS entries, you could certainly circumvent their approach.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vic</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/screen-rant-server-upgrade-vic-1304/comment-page-1/#comment-10397</link>
		<dc:creator>Vic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 04:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/screen-rant-server-upgrade-1304/#comment-10397</guid>
		<description>test
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>test</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

