Related Posts:

17 Comments


Gravatar
Jody said,
October 4th, 2008 

Having watched the first batch of webisodes when they came out, the show has suffered a bit, pacing wise, with the transition to TV.

Gone from the pilot is a whole sub-plot about who the police blamed for the killings — a low life played by STARGATE’s David Hewitt. Dunne’s character proves his mettle by showing the cops have the wrong man, then he launches his investigation into the kid with the deadly appendage.

I won’t go into all of the changes made in the transition — heh, I don’t remember them all — other than to note that as a series pilot the episode was a great slower than the first collection of episodes from the web.

Gravatar
Swisspeas said,
October 4th, 2008 

… I’m still trying to figure out the cops’ names thing!!! This storyline is so convoluted and bizarre that I turned off after the first 30-40 minutes.
The whole show is filmed so darkly that I lost interest and later tried to backtrack by watching the eoisode on Imdb.com,but I’m still struggling… and I’m a pretty smart guy. This show would not do well amongst the Monday night Football crowd, or most audiences unfortunately. Amanda Tapping is a good actress but I see her as wallowing in this SANCTUARY show, not sure what to do. She could still be an Executive Producer, though. I agree with the previous post — this show will not last out the season. Too bad, because it has definite possibilities. But I also add: pick up the pace. Maybe it’ll make it better?

Gravatar
COL Bright said,
October 4th, 2008 

I’m sorry but this show MUST GO… geesh!!! Better luck next time to A. Tapping. Maybe get MacGyver to appear for a ratings jump. Just IMO.

Gravatar
T said,
October 4th, 2008 

Y’know, I thought it was good. While it may not have been constantly rock-em-sock-em action, it does something that many shows don’t do, attempt to develop a decent and intriguing plot line. Relying on all flash no substance is what has left the majority of today’s TV as one vapid wasteland of drek, bore me to tears reality shows, police drama done to death, yet another hospital drama, and all the other things that make today’s television a yawnfest of tedium and unoriginality. Worst yet the studio powers-that-be demanding instant hits instead of allowing a show to develop a following and not just rely on flash and star name attraction really turns more people off and makes them less likely to watch than it does to attract viewership.
Sadly, the show WILL most likely be canceled simply because that’s my personal curse. If I like it, it’s doomed. Ah well, I’ll watch for as long as it airs, long may Sanctuary be for All.

Gravatar
October 4th, 2008 
Jody: That’s what I’ve heard, and strange as it may seem, this two hour premiere was a “re-shoot” of the first four web episodes.

I also find it interesting that Sci-Fi is doing what it always does in alienating fans: It was initially indicated that the deal with the Sci-Fi channel wouldn’t impact web access of the series, but they are presently not available online. Go figure.

Swisspeas: The first time through, I thought I missed the names of the cops and detectives that responded to the murder scene. I watched it again in the second airing… nada!

T: Yes. I agree whole heartedly with you, but the networks are beholden to the advertisers and they want sales instantly. It is a most unfortunate circumstance because I don’t mind story development one bit. Even if it did seems a bit slower than my patience was ready for.

Gravatar
Jody said,
October 4th, 2008 

>That’s what I’ve heard, and strange as it may seem, this two hour premiere was a “re-shoot” of the first four web episodes.

Yeah, I think I heard the same thing. It made sense since there were some actual sets this time, so obviously some new monies were ponied up.

Shame was, I’d have thought that they could have delivered something even stronger than what we got.

Gravatar
October 4th, 2008 
Yea. Somehow, Sci-Fi confused it up.
Gravatar
Andy said,
October 4th, 2008 

“The cops also end up dead because of an appendage that pops out and feeds on brains when Alexi is afraid.”

Doesn’t it feed on brains when the person Alexi is around is scared? Not when Alexi is scared?

Gravatar
Gary said,
October 5th, 2008 

I hope Sci-fi get its act together with future episodes.
Dont blow this one.

Gravatar
J. H. said,
October 5th, 2008 

Slow, dull and confusing. I outlasted the rest of my family by 30 minutes and still didn’t see the end! And what was with the Michael Shanks/Daniel lookalike?

We won’t be watching this weeks episode.

Gravatar
J. H. said,
October 5th, 2008 

Oh and another thing, Tapping should stick to the Canadian accent because she sure can’t do an English one! And the Torchwood rip off scene on the roof top…wonder if they can sue? Then again that would open the door for the Buffy guys and the Stargate guys and every other shows ptb’s this piece of rubbish ripped.

What were Sci Fi thinking?

Gravatar
Gary said,
October 5th, 2008 

any ratings yet ?

Gravatar
John "Kahless" Taylor said,
October 6th, 2008 

I too started watching it but became bored. I keep giving Sci-Fi Channel chances but they keep letting me down; they seem to only do Stargates right.

Gravatar
October 7th, 2008 

Just tried watching this. Bored the crap out of me. Turned it off and deleted it from my DVR.

Vic

Gravatar
suzanne said,
October 11th, 2008 

I thought that it had potential. The only thing that I found distractiong was Tapping’s accent, which I though was unneccessary and frankly a little strange. It detracted from her dialogue. The use of Heyerdahl was very nice, and I will probably continue to watch just for him.

Gravatar
John Patricks said,
October 28th, 2008 

I really like this show, its improves each week, I think the acting is excellent, nice twists with the characters, I’m hoping its lasts longer than one season.

Gravatar
October 28th, 2008 
John: I tend to agree with you, that the episodes are improving. Though it would seem difficult to not improve over how it started. So kudos to the show for the improvement.

A few cons:
I’m still trying to adjust to Amanda Tapping’s accent though and there are still a few gaps in story lines.

Thanks for visiting John.

What's your opinion? Leave a comment!
GravatarWant to change your avatar?
Go to Gravatar.com and upload your own (we'll wait)!

 Name (*required)

 Email Address (*private)

 Website (optional)

 Rules: No profanity or personal attacks.


If your comment doesn't show up immediately, it may have gotten caught in our trusty (but occasionally overly ambitious) spam filter. Please try refreshing the page first, then drop us a note and we'll retrieve it.