Related Posts:

4 Comments


Gravatar
Spider-Ham said,
October 22nd, 2007 

Spider-Man 3 was way better than the “full of holes” suck-fest that was Spider-Man 2.

Gravatar
Doug, Michigan. said,
October 23rd, 2007 

OH! ED remake?
If I fail at SM4 maybe I can throw my name into the hat for that one!

Of course, Bruce is probably getting to old for that kind of role.

Hmm, Bruce’s nephew? Son? Second cousins, roommates girlfriend’s, ex-boyfriend?

Gravatar
October 23rd, 2007 
If a remake is ever done, Bruce is not supposed to be in it. All new cast.

Vic

Gravatar
Zardoz said,
January 11th, 2008 

I can’t trust Sam anymore after how lame Spider Man 3 was… Can’t disagree MORE with Spider-Ham on Spider-Man 2 being full of holes by comparison… I just want to see a Spider-Man movie where he DOESN’T get unmasked… where like Spider-Man I and unlike 3 it stays true to the heart of the characters. Everyone went out of their way to contrive miscommunication for the sake of more drama. Peter Parker would have put the brakes on MUCH earlier and would NEVER even CONSIDER striking Mary Jane… or intentionally hurting her feelings, or anything near that dark… There were too many villains and non-Peter-Parker behavior in 3, and too many liberties were taken. I’d even forgive the villains being given MORE humanity than their comic counterparts in all three films because in a sense, it’s a Peter-Parker way of looking at the world so why not… but when the villains have more humanity THAN Peter Parker? Not what we go to see a Spider-Man film for.

What's your opinion? Leave a comment!
GravatarWant to change your avatar?
Go to Gravatar.com and upload your own (we'll wait)!

 Name (*required)

 Email Address (*private)

 Website (optional)

 Rules: No profanity or personal attacks.


If your comment doesn't show up immediately, it may have gotten caught in our trusty (but occasionally overly ambitious) spam filter. Please try refreshing the page first, then drop us a note and we'll retrieve it.