Comments on: Actors:To Strike Or Not To Strike?

By: John

John — Tue, 15 Jul 2008 17:01:46 +0000

Hollywood is controlled by bigots.

Who on earth cares about the Hollywood elite?

Of course, Tom Hanks is against a strike. He wants to continue making his millions and starring in garbage like Angels and Demons.

My feeling is the actors should strike to make up for the loss of all the DVD sales.

Don’t get deceived. Hollywood controls the news, TV, movies, magazines, books – almost everything you watch.

They are run by people who hate everyone but their own ethnicity. They’re manipulators of your mind to help them selfishly gain an advantage over everyone else.

They cleverly build ‘Intolerance Museums’ when they’re the most intolerable people on the planet.

By: Suzanne

Suzanne — Fri, 11 Jul 2008 06:55:43 +0000

I swear to God if they strike I’m going to cancel my membership to Netflix and never go to another movie theater. I’m sick of these vain, arrogant people who don’t consider what they are doing to the thousands of people who will lose their jobs and the economy of California.

By: 790

790 — Fri, 11 Jul 2008 03:25:24 +0000

Good news Heath, keep the updates a comming.

These strikes have sucked the mojo out of this town.

By: Rob

Rob — Thu, 10 Jul 2008 13:34:50 +0000

That’s good news. There definately should not be a strike. I think the Writer’s strike actually had some legitamacy and support of the public with how writers were not getting any from internet tv showings and getting pretty much nothing from DVD sales. I’m not sure the actors would get such support, especially movie actors.