‘Runner Runner’ Review

Published 10 months ago by

Justin Timberlake Ben Affleck Runner Runner Runner Runner Review

In Runner Runner, Richie Furst (Justin Timberlake) is a Masters in Finance candidate at Princeton University – as well as a marketing rep for one of the Internet’s largest online gambling firms. Unfortunately, when the Dean puts an end to the grad student’s referral business, Furst cannot keep up with his tuition payments and is forced to risk the remainder of his savings in the hopes of winning enough money at online poker to pay his way through the rest of school. Raised in the world of high stakes gambling by his father, Furst is a skilled card player, quickly racking up a solid pot of winnings, only to see it all drained away by a suspicious player with an uncanny win ratio.

Convinced that he’s been hustled out of his tuition money, Furst books a flight to Costa Rica to get face time with the reclusive Ivan Block (Ben Affleck), CEO of Midnight Black (the company Furst suspects of cheating), to get his winnings back. Impressed by Furst’s smarts and gambling knowledge, Block offers him a dream job with a seven-figure salary in the picturesque country – even allowing Furst to hire some of his closest friends to assist in managing the company. However, it isn’t long before Furst is contacted by FBI Agent Shavers (Anthony Mackie) who shares a very different perspective on Ivan Block and the Midnight Black empire – insight that puts Furst and his friends in grave danger.

Anthony Mackie Justin Timberlake Runner Runner Runner Runner Review

Justin Timberlake as Richie Furst in ‘Runner Runner’

Runner Runner was directed by Brad Thurman, best known for his 2010 critical and commercial hit The Lincoln Lawyer, from a script by Ocean’s Thirteen writing pair, Brian Koppelman and David Levien. Regrettably, despite solid talent behind the camera and a competent cast, Runner Runner is a flat and generic drama thriller from start to finish. Worst of all, despite a number of heavy-handed allegories about risk (and betting on yourself), the film fails to do anything interesting with its gambling subject – which, by the end, is nothing more than a backdrop for a familiar story about corrupt officials and opportunistic business people. In general, it’s not a bad film, as there are plenty of redeeming qualities that will make it entertaining for certain moviegoers, but Runner Runner falls short of delivering anything fresh or unique and merely retraces story arcs and character tropes that audiences will have seen multiple times before.

The biggest drawback for a lot of viewers will be the film’s story – which moves so quickly that it has little time to develop worthwhile payoff or dramatic tension. The brief 90-minute runtime is a cliff-noted version of events – highlighting key moments between characters as they pertain to the larger movements of the story but rarely bothering to provide any subtle moments of development that separate good and great drama stories. Instead, the majority of scenes are on-the-nose point-counterpoint exchanges which gradually reveal Block to be a sociopath, while Furst subsequently adapts to protect himself. Whenever momentum stalls, Thurman introduces a new character (or threat), someone gets punched in the face, or Agent Shavers is brought into the mix for more screen time (and yelling) – because, under the surface, the story and characters are too thin to sustain interest independently.

Ben Affleck Ivon Block Runner Runner Runner Runner Review

Ben Affleck as Ivan Block in ‘Runner Runner’

Still, in spite of mostly one-note roles, the cast manages to keep things engaging. Timberlake once again provides a relatively generic but likable everyman (similar to his desperate/naive/intelligent Will Salas from In Time). The actor delivers in nearly every scene of the film, standing toe-to-toe with a veteran Affleck in a wide range of interactions – where Furst is on top of the world, terrified out of his mind, or desperately attempting to hide fear and discontent. It’s not a particularly nuanced performance but Timberlake elevates Runner Runner through sheer will and charm to distract from otherwise vanilla story material.

Affleck is working on a deeper level, but the clumsy and rushed narrative doesn’t allow the actor to present Block as anything more than a callous and conniving white collar criminal. It’s enjoyable to see the award-winning actor/filmmaker transition Block from a friendly and inviting mentor to a twisted and cruel enemy, but the success of the performance is due entirely to Affleck’s delivery – which offers some cathartic humor in tense but otherwise lifeless scenes. That said, despite some sharp subtleties from Affleck, Block isn’t intriguing enough to sell the movie on his own and falls short as a memorable or particularly inventive antagonist.

Sadly, Gemma Arterton and Anthony Mackie’s Rebecca Shafran and Agent Shavers, respectively, are also missed opportunities – relegated to exposition machines with little individual explorations. Shafran is actually one of the more interesting characters in the movie, with an intriguing backstory as well as drama potential that goes entirely unexplored, and Shavers is stripped down for generic/angry FBI agent duty – which, in spite of likable Mackie in the role, does not present anything fresh about U.S. operatives working outside of jurisdiction.

Gemma Arterton Justin Timberlake Runner Runner Runner Runner Review

Gemma Arterton and Justin Timberlake in ‘Runner Runner’

By far the biggest shortcoming of the film is the lack of interconnectivity between the gambling world and the characters in the movie itself. Early on, a behind-the-scenes glimpse at the online gaming industry is captivating but the film never commits to maintaining the insight as the larger crime narrative locks into place. Throughout the film, Thurman attempts to remind viewers that Runner Runner is about gambling through heavy-handed metaphors and exposition that explain the connections between high-stakes poker and high-roller living but none of these ideas come full circle by the end – as the story locks into a standard cat and mouse chase.

As a result, gambling enthusiasts will likely conclude that Runner Runner is a shallow, and outright superficial, look at their hobby/business while anyone hoping for a sharp-witted look behind-the-scenes will find the film prioritizes generic story beats over innovative drama. Solid performances hint that, somewhere along the line, Thurman lost sight of any captivating hooks in his gambling thriller – instead delivering a bland and familiar narrative that, given the on-the-nose messages about striving for greatness, ironically, takes very few risks.

If you’re still on the fence about Runner Runner, check out the trailer below:

-

[poll id="691"]

___

Runner Runner runs 91 minutes and is Rated R for language and some sexual content. Now playing in theaters.

Let us know what you thought of the film in the comment section below.

Follow me on Twitter @benkendrick for future reviews, as well as movie, TV, and gaming news.

Our Rating:

2 out of 5
(Okay)

Get our free email alerts on the topics and author of this article:
TAGS: runner runner

18 Comments

Post a Comment

  1. Haven’t seen the film, but there’s one thing I have to say based on this review:Costa Rica is NOT an island.

    Sincerely,
    A Costa Rican

    • Thanks for catching that typo. Block owns an island – the “country” part was a holdover from my first draft. I’ve simplified the line for clarity.

      • No problem, our country been confused with an island is something us Costa Ricans are used to from hollywood (Jurassic Park anyone?). Anyway, big fan of the site keep up the great work man!

  2. Everyone will now be saying Ben Affleck was in Runner Runner!! How can he possibly be Batman!!!!

    • But he’s one of the best parts of the film – and Runner Runner is no Gigli or Daredevil ;)

      • Except for the fact that, as also pointed out, Justin Timberlake was able to give just as good a performance as Affleck. That is not a compliment to Timberlake’s tepid acting skills…

        • I’m pretty clear in the review that Affleck gives a stronger and more nuanced performance.

          • Yeah, that’s what a few reviews over here said last week or the previous week when it released. Affleck’s the best thing about it but isn’t on screen for very long. I’d never heard of it until I saw the Mark Kermode review a few weeks back and when they showed a clip from the film, it honestly seemed boring and not worth watching.

  3. I actually liked it. Thought it was entertaining (which I thought was the PRIMARY responsibility of any movie). Not every movie HAS to be Oscar-worthy either IMO. People looking for a movie to “change their lives” really need to be looking elsewhere. Man, these so-called “reviews” keep getting stranger and stranger. How about we judge a movie on it’s entertainment value and not so much on its RELATIVE ability to be emotionally meaningful yada yada yada….?

    • wow

    • Every movie can’t be a oscar condenser or blow peoples mind BUT every movie should at least try. If they fall ahort then so be it.

      • Lol condenser.. Ahort .. Ouch Thx iphone…

    • I understand not every movie is an oscar worthy movie but most studios want it to be something oscar worthy. Yes, a movie is intended on entertaining someone but if that’s the arguement, then why show it on the big screen? I’ve been plenty entertained by a lot of straight to DVD movies. If I am going to spend the big money that it takes to go see it on the big screen I want something that isn’t just another popcorn flick.

  4. Timberlake’s voice is too soft for him to pass as an intimidating force. I don’t buy him in these roles, nor did I for In Time, etc.

  5. I was interested in this movie, right up to when I saw Justin Timberlake was in it.

    I’ll wait until this comes out on cable.

  6. Watched it. Not that interesting really. It’s all about bribing your way out of trouble.

  7. The Affleck Image Rehab campaign is in full swing. I heard uses the PR manager as Joseph Gordon

  8. Ben’s most recent flop could not have come at a worse time. I wonder if this has shaked any of WB’s misplaced faith in Batfleck.

Post a Comment

GravatarWant to change your avatar?
Go to Gravatar.com and upload your own (we'll wait)!

 Rules: No profanity or personal attacks.
 Use a valid email address or risk being banned from commenting.


If your comment doesn't show up immediately, it may have been flagged for moderation. Please try refreshing the page first, then drop us a note and we'll retrieve it.

Be Social, Follow Us!!