Comments on: Time For Another Catwoman/Batman 3 Rumor

By: Dr

Dr — Tue, 15 Dec 2009 16:28:02 +0000

Sienna Miller as catwoman would be purrrrrrfect.

By: Maestra Sierra

Maestra Sierra — Thu, 26 Nov 2009 09:59:51 +0000

Anyone, but Megan Fox that’s for sure. Catwoman is too agile, intelligent, sophisticated, elegant, and crafty of a woman that I fear Ms. Fox would just tarnish and cheapen the character with her bad acting abilities… and don’t give me the “it’s the directors and writers fault”, because that’s just bull. The directors and writers do direct and write for the actors, but it’s up to the actors to enhance and perfect what they were directed and written to do, so far I’m not impressed with Ms. Fox abilities.

As for Rosario Dawson, now that’s an actor. She enhances and makes a movie great (perfect if you will). I wouldn’t mind her being Catwoman

By: sam

sam — Sun, 04 Oct 2009 22:58:12 +0000

I think the one who should be catwoman in batman 3 is charlize theron she has that cat vibe and the personality.

By: obdulia

obdulia — Sun, 04 Oct 2009 22:53:25 +0000

I think charlize theron would make a nice catwomanin batman 3 and she makes a very nice couple with cristean bale and their the same age and she is a great actress and she has a exotic look

By: coach corey

coach corey — Wed, 05 Aug 2009 20:22:07 +0000

angelina jolie, the right age, sexy enough for the roll, to me the right person to pull it off, plus I love those lips, don’t you?

By: Chris

Chris — Mon, 06 Apr 2009 00:03:31 +0000

What do people think about Michelle Williams?

I just finished watch Deception and even though, the movie was bad, I thought she did a great job!

http://z.about.com/d/movies/1/0/q/I/R/deceptionpic1.jpg

If they styled her similar to this movie and I think she could definitely pull it off.

By: nick

nick — Mon, 02 Mar 2009 04:18:29 +0000

rosario dawson is puuurfect for the role she is stunning, sexy, smart, lithe, dark, feminine and feline, a little twisted and yet still completely relateable if there is to be a catwomen, which i hope there is, rosario dawson get’s my vote….cause it’s worth so much.
catwomen is a different type of villan which is what the next movie will need she has alterior motives for the things she does, she is multi facited, she has a balance of good and evil that is in stark contrast to her completely irrational and unbalanced actions as both selena and catwomen.
Nolan would be crazy not to revive, evolve, twist and expand on this celebrated icon

By: A Nonymous

A Nonymous — Mon, 09 Feb 2009 03:19:56 +0000

I agree wtih a previous post – Tricia Helfer would be perfect for the role. She can kick ass, do vulnerable, is Christian Bale’s age, is not (currently) an overpriced A-lister but can act the pants off of any of the previous suggestions, and yes, she looks great in or out of a leather catsuit. As for how/when to bring in Catwoman, no, she should not be the “villain”, especially not the main villain, in the 3rd movie. Selina Kyle should be introduced in the 3rd movie, as the new love interest of Bruce Wayne. The anti-Rachel who helps heal his broken heart, but she’s not Catwoman yet. Until the end, when she’s either mauled by her kittens or whatever ingenious method is used to make her become Catwoman. Batman couldn’t save Harvey Dent, but he tries his darnedest to save Selina in the 4th movie. Like with Rachel, you can’t just throw her character in and expect the chemistry and history to automatically be there. It has to matter to Bruce. Especially with all he’s lost in Dark Knight.

By: PhotoShopLifter Dan

PhotoShopLifter Dan — Mon, 12 Jan 2009 17:48:06 +0000

I’m in favor of Penguin, so long as we don’t see Penguin as he was in the last Batman cartoon series…where he had these two bodyguards that were a combo of a kabuki dancer and Wolverine; and where Penguin was this fat, impossibly-agile martial arts dude?

By: huntthejest

huntthejest — Mon, 12 Jan 2009 17:30:25 +0000

Haha, Dan you’re my hero. Rachel=dead. Don’t mention her in future installments. Sadly, Nolan has declared Harvey=dead. Also not participating in the third movie. Gyllenhaal is a much better actress than Holmes, but I think in Dark Knight they could’ve stuck with the less talented more attractive one. Congrats to Heath on the Golden Globe, cuz God knows the best acting this year was when he had to call Gyllenhaal beautiful with a straight face. I mean, Rachael had like 3 lines and just had to stand there and be pretty, which is pretty much the only thing Katie Holmes is good for(did anyone actually watch Mad Money btw? You know the piece that Holmes decided on as an “artist” over one of the biggest-hits-ever?) All this being said, I”m all for Catwoman and Riddler in the new movie, wouldn’t mind Penguin as a mob boss as long as they stay far from Burton’s take on him, because then you have the classic Batman villian trifecta. And I want to see Nolan bring them to life. As far as Hush, wouldn’t want to see him on screen. Not a very interesting character. The best thing the Hush story arc did was make Batman start acting human again.

By: PhotoShopLifter Dan

PhotoShopLifter Dan — Mon, 12 Jan 2009 16:39:10 +0000

@ Glitter:
1., It’s Maggie Gyllenhaal, so you were only off by 2 letters.

2., Unless Nolan has totally reversed his stand on this, Two-Face is worm buffet.

3., You’ve offered up 2 different actresses, both playing the same role in different chapters of the Nolan-ized Batfilms; that said, I can’t see either one doing justice to Catwoman.

And 4. If you wouldn’t want it, why suggest it?

By: Glitter

Glitter — Mon, 12 Jan 2009 00:25:31 +0000

Hmmmm….What about our last character in the movie? You know Maggie Dylenhaal (sorry i can’t spell her name)? No one’s mentioned her. Now I for sure don’t see her in a tight suit doing flips with a whip, but wouldn’t that be something. You know Rachel coming back from the “dead” and being catwoman? haha there’s something. it would be just like what Gordon did in the movie. And who wouldn’t say that Two-face isn’t coming back. I mean he really should. But that’s another matter. This is catwoman. I’m not good with actresses but I think Katie from Batman Begins should be Rachel (IF) she randomly came back as catwoman. That would be totally expected though by viewers, but Christopher Nolan is jam packed with movie directing right now. I’m sure Batman 3 is kind of 3rd in line. But just think about it. Its not impossible. Not that I would want it.

By: Geremi

Geremi — Sun, 14 Dec 2008 00:11:36 +0000

“If there is to be a Catwoman, there’s a certain sass that the role requires. Halle Berry didn’t have it and Warner Bros. found that out the hard way.”

This is what I have to say about the whole situation, people are act fast at jumping to conclusion about the an individuals ability to act. I do agree the writing of the Catwoman movie was beyond poor. Compaired to Catwomans role in the Batman series the plot sucked.

You really can’t concluded that Halle didn’t have that zing. She had the body, she did all of her stunts, and she had the cat like movement down packed. To say that she didn’t have it is ludicrous. I have been reading up on the current rumors about who is going to play the part for a movie that hasn’t been written yet and I would rather see Halle play that part over Cher and Angie!!

By: movieman

movieman — Fri, 12 Dec 2008 12:29:22 +0000

I think the next batman movie should have the riddler and catwomen in it. sounds like a wierd pair but i would have jonny depp as the riddler he would do an awesome job i just know it. Catwomen i would have Elisha Cuthbert play catwomen she looks perfect for the part. I think scarecrow should be back in this one as well and i think if they do make a fourth it should be based on Mr. Freeze in which i would love to see Edward Norton play.

By: chipsnopotatoes

chipsnopotatoes — Sat, 15 Nov 2008 12:03:23 +0000

After watching Casino Royale again this week, Eva Green would be my pick. She’s got the screen presence and could definitely pull off a smart, classy, and deadly Selina Kyle.

By: Vince

Vince — Wed, 05 Nov 2008 19:04:13 +0000

This is all kinds of wrong. If they do Catwoman (which is highly doubtful) in Batman 3 (which isn’t even definite), they need to go down a completely unexpected, but cerebrial, dark road, like they went with The Joker. Mitra doesn’t fit into this vision, but it’s my vision, so who cares!

By: Jess

Jess — Sun, 26 Oct 2008 01:56:16 +0000

That is true I dont find it a big deal but that is just me

By: FRED

FRED — Sat, 25 Oct 2008 03:09:34 +0000

Warner bros. also wants a popular batman movie. The R rating would make it earn a much smaller budget since there would be a smaller group of viewers. There are some adults that do not like blood and swearing.

By: Jess

Jess — Sat, 25 Oct 2008 02:12:11 +0000

I think the only reason that TDK didnt get the R rating because their was no swearing and no blood which is odd considering the tone that Nolan was creating but it was still good

By: FRED

FRED — Fri, 24 Oct 2008 03:51:42 +0000

Yup, fair enough. I think That because Hush is a lesser known villian , that Nolan should Make an Origin Film on Hush, like a low budget one, and then make batman 3 , that way , Hush will be more well-known by fans.Then , in Batman 3, Nolan should try to develop Hush’s character further. And I would not mind Nolan going for an R rating on this one because his batman films have a dark tone, and Hush is probably more darker than the Joker.