<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Towelhead Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://screenrant.com/review-towelhead-vic-1274/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://screenrant.com/review-towelhead-vic-1274/</link>
	<description>TV and Movie News without the Sugar Coating</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 16:44:13 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John "Kahless" Taylor</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/review-towelhead-vic-1274/comment-page-2/#comment-60762</link>
		<dc:creator>John "Kahless" Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 17:46:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/review-towelhead-1274/#comment-60762</guid>
		<description>There were some decent parts in The Happening? Hmmm. I must have fallen asleep before they showed those. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There were some decent parts in The Happening? Hmmm. I must have fallen asleep before they showed those. <img src='http://screenrant.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Viktor</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/review-towelhead-vic-1274/comment-page-2/#comment-60758</link>
		<dc:creator>Viktor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 17:35:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/review-towelhead-1274/#comment-60758</guid>
		<description>To consider Grindhouse as a B-movie (i do as well) is proof that it&#039;s possible to intentionally shape a movie to become one, at least in a partial way.
This may or may not be the intention of Shyamalan with The Happening.
Or The Mist.
For both films, i don&#039;t think that these cheesy elements do any good to the experience, except for satisfying the ego of the makers, just distract a bit from the remaing decent parts of them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To consider Grindhouse as a B-movie (i do as well) is proof that it&#8217;s possible to intentionally shape a movie to become one, at least in a partial way.<br />
This may or may not be the intention of Shyamalan with The Happening.<br />
Or The Mist.<br />
For both films, i don&#8217;t think that these cheesy elements do any good to the experience, except for satisfying the ego of the makers, just distract a bit from the remaing decent parts of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Eckhart Fan &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Towelhead review</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/review-towelhead-vic-1274/comment-page-2/#comment-37167</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Eckhart Fan &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Towelhead review</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 14:39:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/review-towelhead-1274/#comment-37167</guid>
		<description>[...] Short version: Towelhead manages to balance humor and drama in this cautionary tale of a 13 year old girl’s burgeoning sexuality. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="padding: 1em; border:1px solid #FDB914; padding: 1em;; background: #552302; background-color: #552302; color:#CCCCCC;">
<p>[...] Short version: Towelhead manages to balance humor and drama in this cautionary tale of a 13 year old girl’s burgeoning sexuality. [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vic Holtreman</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/review-towelhead-vic-1274/comment-page-2/#comment-35431</link>
		<dc:creator>Vic Holtreman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 22:25:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/review-towelhead-1274/#comment-35431</guid>
		<description>@Michael

Point taken - I defer to your experience.

Vic</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Michael</p>
<p>Point taken &#8211; I defer to your experience.</p>
<p>Vic</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kurt</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/review-towelhead-vic-1274/comment-page-2/#comment-35375</link>
		<dc:creator>Kurt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 17:27:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/review-towelhead-1274/#comment-35375</guid>
		<description>I think it is safe to say (certainly from my perspective) that Towelhead is much of of an ill conceived mess than an act of sharp provocateur-ism.  I&#039;m quite glad that this film has died a quiet and anonymous death than turned into a &quot;Crash&quot;-type celebration of quality cinema.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it is safe to say (certainly from my perspective) that Towelhead is much of of an ill conceived mess than an act of sharp provocateur-ism.  I&#8217;m quite glad that this film has died a quiet and anonymous death than turned into a &#8220;Crash&#8221;-type celebration of quality cinema.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael E. Piston, Troy, MI</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/review-towelhead-vic-1274/comment-page-2/#comment-35364</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael E. Piston, Troy, MI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 16:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/review-towelhead-1274/#comment-35364</guid>
		<description>In response to Vic Holtreman, yes the movie did make me feel uncomfortable, and that&#039;s why I didn&#039;t like it. Regarding your question about my background, as a matter of fact I work with Lebanese on a regular basis, at least enough to know that the portrayal of the father was profoundly inaccurate in many details, from lack of an accent to a rigid manner so atypical of the warmth and openness of most Lebanese men, but all that is beside the point. All one needs to know about the father is what the film gives us - a rigid personality profoundly uncomfortable with his daughter&#039;s sexuality. It is not consistent with such a character that he would advertise his own sexuality to his daughter, by having loud sex within earshot to openly cavorting with his girlfriend in his daughter&#039;s presence afterwards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In response to Vic Holtreman, yes the movie did make me feel uncomfortable, and that&#8217;s why I didn&#8217;t like it. Regarding your question about my background, as a matter of fact I work with Lebanese on a regular basis, at least enough to know that the portrayal of the father was profoundly inaccurate in many details, from lack of an accent to a rigid manner so atypical of the warmth and openness of most Lebanese men, but all that is beside the point. All one needs to know about the father is what the film gives us &#8211; a rigid personality profoundly uncomfortable with his daughter&#8217;s sexuality. It is not consistent with such a character that he would advertise his own sexuality to his daughter, by having loud sex within earshot to openly cavorting with his girlfriend in his daughter&#8217;s presence afterwards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kurt</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/review-towelhead-vic-1274/comment-page-2/#comment-34250</link>
		<dc:creator>Kurt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 12:40:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/review-towelhead-1274/#comment-34250</guid>
		<description>Lou Diamond Phillips has a small part in Steven Soderbergh&#039;s Che (well, he is in the second part, Guerrilla,  of the two parts (The Argentine &amp; Guerrilla).

But yea, the &#039;bats&#039; movies.  oi!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lou Diamond Phillips has a small part in Steven Soderbergh&#8217;s Che (well, he is in the second part, Guerrilla,  of the two parts (The Argentine &amp; Guerrilla).</p>
<p>But yea, the &#8216;bats&#8217; movies.  oi!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken J</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/review-towelhead-vic-1274/comment-page-2/#comment-34236</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 10:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/review-towelhead-1274/#comment-34236</guid>
		<description>Actually 790, Lou Diamond Phillips is the B-movie king... Ron Pearlman is #2, Shatner is a far 3rd...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually 790, Lou Diamond Phillips is the B-movie king&#8230; Ron Pearlman is #2, Shatner is a far 3rd&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 790</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/review-towelhead-vic-1274/comment-page-2/#comment-34112</link>
		<dc:creator>790</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 00:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/review-towelhead-1274/#comment-34112</guid>
		<description>Shatners the B-Movie king !!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shatners the B-Movie king !!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 790</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/review-towelhead-vic-1274/comment-page-2/#comment-34038</link>
		<dc:creator>790</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 18:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/review-towelhead-1274/#comment-34038</guid>
		<description>Good points John,,,
Funny how bizzare films like American Beauty win Best Picture,,,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good points John,,,<br />
Funny how bizzare films like American Beauty win Best Picture,,,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John "Kahless" Taylor</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/review-towelhead-vic-1274/comment-page-2/#comment-34011</link>
		<dc:creator>John "Kahless" Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 16:24:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/review-towelhead-1274/#comment-34011</guid>
		<description>@790
There were some parts I laughed at but overall I was appauled at the adult fantasizing about the teen cheerleader and the only normal people in the neighborhood was a homosexual couple. I laughed pretty loud at the dinner and drive-in scenes.

I&#039;ll have to put that movie on my Netflix list. Sounds like a comedy; I need a good comedy these days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@790<br />
There were some parts I laughed at but overall I was appauled at the adult fantasizing about the teen cheerleader and the only normal people in the neighborhood was a homosexual couple. I laughed pretty loud at the dinner and drive-in scenes.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll have to put that movie on my Netflix list. Sounds like a comedy; I need a good comedy these days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: INK</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/review-towelhead-vic-1274/comment-page-2/#comment-34002</link>
		<dc:creator>INK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 15:35:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/review-towelhead-1274/#comment-34002</guid>
		<description>How I define a B-Movie:

A movie that is made without A-list actors/actresses on an extremely tight (low) budget and does not have a wide-spread theatrical release. It is campy without meaning to be and the acting is sub-par at best.

When I think of B-movies I tend to think of horror and sci-fi movies from the 70&#039;s and 80&#039;s such as &quot;Kingdom of the SPiders&quot;, &quot;Sleepaway Camp&quot;, &quot;Silent Night, Deadly Night&quot;, etc. However, just because I categorize a movie as a B-movie doesn&#039;t mean I do not like it. All the ones I mentioned are some of my favorites from that time. I guess I see it being solely based on one&#039;s personal way of thinking about movies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How I define a B-Movie:</p>
<p>A movie that is made without A-list actors/actresses on an extremely tight (low) budget and does not have a wide-spread theatrical release. It is campy without meaning to be and the acting is sub-par at best.</p>
<p>When I think of B-movies I tend to think of horror and sci-fi movies from the 70&#8217;s and 80&#8217;s such as &#8220;Kingdom of the SPiders&#8221;, &#8220;Sleepaway Camp&#8221;, &#8220;Silent Night, Deadly Night&#8221;, etc. However, just because I categorize a movie as a B-movie doesn&#8217;t mean I do not like it. All the ones I mentioned are some of my favorites from that time. I guess I see it being solely based on one&#8217;s personal way of thinking about movies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vic Holtreman</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/review-towelhead-vic-1274/comment-page-2/#comment-33992</link>
		<dc:creator>Vic Holtreman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 14:40:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/review-towelhead-1274/#comment-33992</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;&quot;funny that a B-Film is defined so malleable.&quot;&lt;/em&gt;

Indeed. Although I disagree with your idea that genre automatically defines a movie as a &quot;B.&quot;

You&#039;re making me think too hard about a topic I consider inconsequential. :-P

Vic</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>&#8220;funny that a B-Film is defined so malleable.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>Indeed. Although I disagree with your idea that genre automatically defines a movie as a &#8220;B.&#8221;</p>
<p>You&#8217;re making me think too hard about a topic I consider inconsequential. <img src='http://screenrant.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':-P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Vic</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kurt</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/review-towelhead-vic-1274/comment-page-2/#comment-33979</link>
		<dc:creator>Kurt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 14:11:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/review-towelhead-1274/#comment-33979</guid>
		<description>funny that a B-Film is defined so malleable.  You guys define it in terms of execution (low budget, shoddy craftsmanship, poor outcome).

I define it in terms of basic content (monster movies, creature features, jungle adventures, space operas) - regardless of craft.  There are a lot of truly great B-films, from Raiders of the Lost Ark, to Big Trouble in Little China to Hard Target.  Some of these more expensive than others.

Still, I find it difficult to believe that you guys could not label THE MUMMY franchise, League of Extraordinary Gentlemen or Stealth as anything other than B-Schlock, all of which had big budgets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>funny that a B-Film is defined so malleable.  You guys define it in terms of execution (low budget, shoddy craftsmanship, poor outcome).</p>
<p>I define it in terms of basic content (monster movies, creature features, jungle adventures, space operas) &#8211; regardless of craft.  There are a lot of truly great B-films, from Raiders of the Lost Ark, to Big Trouble in Little China to Hard Target.  Some of these more expensive than others.</p>
<p>Still, I find it difficult to believe that you guys could not label THE MUMMY franchise, League of Extraordinary Gentlemen or Stealth as anything other than B-Schlock, all of which had big budgets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: INK</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/review-towelhead-vic-1274/comment-page-2/#comment-33962</link>
		<dc:creator>INK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 13:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/review-towelhead-1274/#comment-33962</guid>
		<description>Want to see the definition of a B-movie?

Check out Sci-Fi channel on saturday nights at 9:00. Violá!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Want to see the definition of a B-movie?</p>
<p>Check out Sci-Fi channel on saturday nights at 9:00. Violá!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken J</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/review-towelhead-vic-1274/comment-page-2/#comment-33947</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 11:26:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/review-towelhead-1274/#comment-33947</guid>
		<description>James2, sorry, but everything you just said simply makes you sound like someone who is mad because you&#039;re an adult and you can&#039;t do anything dirty with young girls but you want to...

Anyway the difference between a minor wanting something and an adult wanting something is that they are going under the assumption that minors are compulsive and unable to make rational decisions with consequences in mind, while adults are assumed to have the ability to make rational and less compulsive decisions. To state it simply, adults should &quot;know better.&quot;

And this is not just some wild and crazy theory or some &quot;religious&quot; thing. This is actually proven science. Studies have proven that as you age, your brain either produces more of a chemical that inhibits compulsive behavior, or less of a chemical that causes compulsive behavior. I forgot which, I do believe it is the first, more of a inhibiting chemical.

And from my personal experiences, I KNOW that younger people often act much quicker without thinking, doing things to simply satisfy a short term craving, while older people tend to be more capable of controlling these urges if they realize there are negative consequences down the road.

So that&#039;s why if you, as an adult, do something sexual with a minor, you are the only one to get in trouble. Because the minor doesn&#039;t know what he or she&#039;s doing, while you do, so you&#039;re the one that&#039;s taking advantage of someone who is vulnerable. Even if they think they are giving consent, they are not qualified (as minors) to make such a decision. Just like I&#039;m sure every child on the block wants to give their consent to be able to drive cars. Should we let them? I&#039;m sure 100% of them will say they are &quot;SURE&quot; they &quot;know&quot; how to drive cars because they&#039;ve seen it done by their parents or on tv. I know when I was younger I thought I would know how to do everything if only the adults would let me. Now that I&#039;m older, I realized how DEAD I would be if those age restrictions were not in place...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James2, sorry, but everything you just said simply makes you sound like someone who is mad because you&#8217;re an adult and you can&#8217;t do anything dirty with young girls but you want to&#8230;</p>
<p>Anyway the difference between a minor wanting something and an adult wanting something is that they are going under the assumption that minors are compulsive and unable to make rational decisions with consequences in mind, while adults are assumed to have the ability to make rational and less compulsive decisions. To state it simply, adults should &#8220;know better.&#8221;</p>
<p>And this is not just some wild and crazy theory or some &#8220;religious&#8221; thing. This is actually proven science. Studies have proven that as you age, your brain either produces more of a chemical that inhibits compulsive behavior, or less of a chemical that causes compulsive behavior. I forgot which, I do believe it is the first, more of a inhibiting chemical.</p>
<p>And from my personal experiences, I KNOW that younger people often act much quicker without thinking, doing things to simply satisfy a short term craving, while older people tend to be more capable of controlling these urges if they realize there are negative consequences down the road.</p>
<p>So that&#8217;s why if you, as an adult, do something sexual with a minor, you are the only one to get in trouble. Because the minor doesn&#8217;t know what he or she&#8217;s doing, while you do, so you&#8217;re the one that&#8217;s taking advantage of someone who is vulnerable. Even if they think they are giving consent, they are not qualified (as minors) to make such a decision. Just like I&#8217;m sure every child on the block wants to give their consent to be able to drive cars. Should we let them? I&#8217;m sure 100% of them will say they are &#8220;SURE&#8221; they &#8220;know&#8221; how to drive cars because they&#8217;ve seen it done by their parents or on tv. I know when I was younger I thought I would know how to do everything if only the adults would let me. Now that I&#8217;m older, I realized how DEAD I would be if those age restrictions were not in place&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vic Holtreman</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/review-towelhead-vic-1274/comment-page-2/#comment-33873</link>
		<dc:creator>Vic Holtreman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 00:42:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/review-towelhead-1274/#comment-33873</guid>
		<description>Back at &#039;cha, Kurt. :-)

Vic</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back at &#8216;cha, Kurt. <img src='http://screenrant.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Vic</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kurt</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/review-towelhead-vic-1274/comment-page-2/#comment-33865</link>
		<dc:creator>Kurt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 23:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/review-towelhead-1274/#comment-33865</guid>
		<description>Fair enough.  Call it a definitional hazard.  It&#039;s been a pleasure mulling things over.  We obviously are coming from quite different ways of looking at the movies, particular on Towelhead (and curiously Ironman &amp; The Happening)

It has been a pleasure turning things over in this regard.  

Cheers dude.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair enough.  Call it a definitional hazard.  It&#8217;s been a pleasure mulling things over.  We obviously are coming from quite different ways of looking at the movies, particular on Towelhead (and curiously Ironman &amp; The Happening)</p>
<p>It has been a pleasure turning things over in this regard.  </p>
<p>Cheers dude.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vic Holtreman</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/review-towelhead-vic-1274/comment-page-2/#comment-33861</link>
		<dc:creator>Vic Holtreman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 23:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/review-towelhead-1274/#comment-33861</guid>
		<description>@Kurt

Ah, now we&#039;re getting down to our different point of views. I don&#039;t consider Raiders, Jaws, or Star Wars B-movies. (Well, I suppose the first Star Wars strays pretty close to the line).

When I think of B-movies, I think primarily of the classic examples of movies from the 1950s that were really shlocky and cheesy - movies where they had monsters that were obviously guys in rubber suits and that sort of thing. Movies that are unintentionally silly, not necessarily movies that set out to be silly. 

To my mind, modern B-movie are films like Grindhouse (intentional, yes), the recent Death Race movie (although I haven&#039;t seen it) and pretty much any horror/sci-fi direct-to-DVD movie that you&#039;ll find on the shelves of your local blockbuster.

Vic</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Kurt</p>
<p>Ah, now we&#8217;re getting down to our different point of views. I don&#8217;t consider Raiders, Jaws, or Star Wars B-movies. (Well, I suppose the first Star Wars strays pretty close to the line).</p>
<p>When I think of B-movies, I think primarily of the classic examples of movies from the 1950s that were really shlocky and cheesy &#8211; movies where they had monsters that were obviously guys in rubber suits and that sort of thing. Movies that are unintentionally silly, not necessarily movies that set out to be silly. </p>
<p>To my mind, modern B-movie are films like Grindhouse (intentional, yes), the recent Death Race movie (although I haven&#8217;t seen it) and pretty much any horror/sci-fi direct-to-DVD movie that you&#8217;ll find on the shelves of your local blockbuster.</p>
<p>Vic</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kurt</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/review-towelhead-vic-1274/comment-page-2/#comment-33850</link>
		<dc:creator>Kurt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 22:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/review-towelhead-1274/#comment-33850</guid>
		<description>Quite the contrary, isn&#039;t Raider of the Lost Ark simple those B-Serials with A-level talent and budget, and isn&#039;t a darn good chunk of blockbusters emulating Raiders?

Isn&#039;t Jaws simply a good old fashioned Monster movie populated with good actors and a talented filmmaker?  B-level stuff with A-level pretentions.  Ditto on Starwars.  Aren&#039;t Jaws/SW/Raiders given credit for the massive shift in 70&#039;s era mainstream-art films like Taxi Driver, The Deer Hunter, The Conversation and Chinatown towards the blockbuster mentality?

How am I off base here?

also you should read your own wikipedia link:  

This passage is directly copied from that:  &quot;By 1990, the cost of the average U.S. film had passed $25 million.[101] Of the nine films released that year to gross more than $100 million at the U.S. box office, two would have been strictly B movie material before the late 1970s: Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles and Dick Tracy. Three more—the science-fiction thriller Total Recall, the action-filled detective thriller Die Hard 2, and the year&#039;s biggest hit, the slapstick kiddie comedy Home Alone—were also far closer to the traditional arena of the Bs than to classic A-list subject matter&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quite the contrary, isn&#8217;t Raider of the Lost Ark simple those B-Serials with A-level talent and budget, and isn&#8217;t a darn good chunk of blockbusters emulating Raiders?</p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t Jaws simply a good old fashioned Monster movie populated with good actors and a talented filmmaker?  B-level stuff with A-level pretentions.  Ditto on Starwars.  Aren&#8217;t Jaws/SW/Raiders given credit for the massive shift in 70&#8217;s era mainstream-art films like Taxi Driver, The Deer Hunter, The Conversation and Chinatown towards the blockbuster mentality?</p>
<p>How am I off base here?</p>
<p>also you should read your own wikipedia link:  </p>
<p>This passage is directly copied from that:  &#8220;By 1990, the cost of the average U.S. film had passed $25 million.[101] Of the nine films released that year to gross more than $100 million at the U.S. box office, two would have been strictly B movie material before the late 1970s: Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles and Dick Tracy. Three more—the science-fiction thriller Total Recall, the action-filled detective thriller Die Hard 2, and the year&#8217;s biggest hit, the slapstick kiddie comedy Home Alone—were also far closer to the traditional arena of the Bs than to classic A-list subject matter&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
