Comments on: Review: The Chronicles Of Narnia: Prince Caspian

By: vernon

vernon — Sun, 13 Jul 2008 17:07:32 +0000

at least we will be held up to date ,but i really do hope and pray that there will be many more of narnia to be seen on the big screen.

By: greenknight333

greenknight333 — Sun, 13 Jul 2008 00:05:01 +0000

Vic

I was under the impression that the third film has been greenlit…

By: Vic Holtreman

Vic Holtreman — Sat, 12 Jul 2008 23:22:59 +0000

The most recent film only made half of what the first one earned both in the US and overseas, so there’s no guarantee that Disney will want to do a third one, although it’s not completely out of the question.

Vic

By: vernon

vernon — Sat, 12 Jul 2008 23:05:34 +0000

am totally agreeing with you kiran rai said ,it was an awesome movie,so much to say about other people,we as fans of narnia must stan together to over come this challence.

By: Kiran Rai

Kiran Rai — Sun, 29 Jun 2008 18:56:18 +0000

Wow…this was a great movie…I loved it…I don’t know why other people didn’t like it. t was an amazing movie. Prince Caspian played a great role.The whole film revolved around him.This was an excellent film.Good job Adamson

By: Amy

Amy — Sun, 29 Jun 2008 09:25:13 +0000

I thought that the first narnia film was amazing & was not sure if prince caspian was going to live upto the standard that the first one had set, but I am happy to say in my opinion it defiantely did. the special & visual effects were great & I could follow the story easily. I liked how the the fauns & centaurs from the first film came back into it. one thing that did it for me was Ben Barnes! he played his character of prince caspian very well & I enjoyed looking at him for 2 hours. the director has chosen to show fight scenes but they were not gory or bloody. i have not read any of the following books & was wondering if peter & susan ever come back to narnia. if you enjoyed the first film I would defiantely reccomend this one.

By: Screen Rant

Screen Rant — Wed, 04 Jun 2008 18:29:30 +0000

Well my daughter read the book the week before seeing the movie and she was disappointed by how much they changed it on screen. She said it was a double-whammy: not only did they leave stuff out that was critical in the book, they also ADDED a lot that WASN’T in the original.

She was bummed because while she thought the movie was good, she couldn’t stop thinking about the differences while watching it.

Vic

By: patrick

patrick — Wed, 04 Jun 2008 17:54:33 +0000

the makers of Prince Caspian kept to the original story better than i would have expected… i had heard they were going to make it into a silly pure-action flick, but thankfully this was not the case

By: nazla

nazla — Mon, 26 May 2008 05:29:30 +0000

narnia keren bgt!

By: 790

790 — Wed, 21 May 2008 05:24:09 +0000

Well I’ve never liked the Midevil timeline. LOTR, changed that for me.
Everything I’ve ragged on since has been because its a dirivitive of the LOTR franchise.
Harry Potter, (IMO) looks like a horrible video game.

Golden Compass was bad in every way. The cast to be specific.
But hey what do I know?

By: Andy

Andy — Wed, 21 May 2008 05:13:37 +0000

790, why is it that you don’t like the fantasy genre? Did “The Wizard of Oz” give you nightmares as a child or something?? I’m curious, because you seem to love the scifi/comic movies and they’re very closely related to fantasy. Admittedly, I am not a big Harry Potter fan (never read any of the books or saw the films), but I wouldn’t say people who read them are retarded. Hey, at least the kids are READING!

As for “The Golden Compass,” I don’t know why everyone is hating on that film. Then again, I was watching it on a plane and it was either that or stare out the window. Believe me, I was surprised I enjoyed it because I can’t really stand Nicole Kidman for some reason.

By: John "Kahless" Taylor

John "Kahless" Taylor — Tue, 20 May 2008 14:37:18 +0000

Well, I guess I can be counted among the so-called retarded because I like the Harry Potter movies. I didn’t like The Golden Compass, so does that make me a semi-blind sheep?

People have their likes and dislikes, but I find it very strange that people will resort to name-calling because a person likes something you don’t like.

By: Surma

Surma — Tue, 20 May 2008 01:31:33 +0000

Don’t be hatin man. I’m not gonna say anything back because frankly I respect this website. Only thing is that you know its your freedom to not click on links.

By: 790

790 — Mon, 19 May 2008 22:51:31 +0000

Hey Rob I agree 100.000% on Golden Compass and Potter crap.
But don’t be raggin on Surma!!!!!!!!!!

By: Rob

Rob — Mon, 19 May 2008 22:37:54 +0000

Uhhh…Surma,

please don’t post stupid crap like that. Not only is it terrible and not funny, it looks like some 6 year old made it in 10 minutes.

As for the more important stuff: Goldan Compass was terrible and I aint paying to see any more of them if there are sequels (not even to rent). As for Harry Potter, these books and films are not even that well-written, it was just luck of the draw that some book club for kids picked it up out of the 200 kids fantasy novels and now look – we have these overrated films that the sheep keep supporting. Not only that, these sheep are so blind that they will pay twice as much to see the last and final book on screen in two separate parts… **claps hands like a retarded seal**

By: Surma

Surma — Mon, 19 May 2008 17:27:36 +0000

OMG OMG If you hated Golden Compass you have to watch this. http://motion-picture.ytmnd.com/

By: 790

790 — Mon, 19 May 2008 17:23:13 +0000

Oh sorry Greenknight333,
(IMO), pretty much all the fantasy films past LOTR are just aweful.

And the Potter series,, well I won’t go there.

The few minutes of Golden Compass I saw allmost drove me out of the video store it was playing in.

By: Greenknight333

Greenknight333 — Mon, 19 May 2008 16:30:23 +0000

790 I don’t hate the fantasy genre..I think celluloid is the perfect medium for fantasy films..They have to be done right though and just because a fantasy movie has lots of great effects doesn’t portend to a great final product. I look to Eragon as an example of this..good effects but not a good movie…I don’t think that Del Torro will do as good a job as Peter Jackson with the Hobbit films but I am hoping still that they will be great..Jackson will write and executive produce so he will still have a large amount of control over how it is going to be made. The genre is great but not a lot of the fantasy movies coming out right now are reflective of the potential of the genre..I LOVED THE LOTR MOVIES!!!!

By: Surma

Surma — Mon, 19 May 2008 14:51:10 +0000

What was the deal with the modern nasty sappy song at the end. That completely took me out of the atmostphere before the movie was over I hated it.

By: steven the git

steven the git — Mon, 19 May 2008 11:46:48 +0000

The interesting thing about this series, and maybe the benefit of it, is that the stars change, so that in the next movie, unless they deviate from the book, Peter and Susan won’t be in it. Choosing Eustace will be quite a significant decision in the long run, more than the first four.
Love to know how and when they will fit the Magician’s Nephew into it.