Related Posts:

13 Comments


Gravatar
Gary said,
August 5th, 2007 

BEST action of film of the summer nuff said

Gravatar
Vic said,
August 5th, 2007 
Without a doubt. While Die Hard 4 was popcorn fluff and the T-movie was ridiculous, this one was truly entertaining.

Vic

Gravatar
Zachary said,
August 6th, 2007 

I must say, I am going to see this A.S.A.P. I loved the first two and saw them both in the movies. So, why not complete the trilogy?

Gravatar
Vic said,
August 6th, 2007 
When this comes out as an uber-3-DVD set it will DEFINITELY be worth picking up. :-)
Vic
Gravatar
August 9th, 2007 

This movie does not let the viewer down. It may not be as good as the original, but who cares! Highly recommended.

Gravatar
Dave said,
August 20th, 2007 

most realistic hand to hand fight scenes? are you kidding? I loved the movie and thought it was great

BUT - Greengrass does that insanely annoying WHIP-SHAKE the !#$ camera everytime he has a @!#$%^ fight scene. Damon has worked out and done the training - you can see it in the first movie obviously.

Back the camera up, stop shaking it, and SHOOT the damn FIGHT

One of the characters could have been humping a squirrel right in the middle of the fight and you wouldn’t have been able to tell….

Gravatar
August 20th, 2007 
I wasn’t referring to the way the fight scenes were shot, I was referring to the fighting style.

I agree that the shaken camera syndrome is a pain in the butt.

Vic

Gravatar
Dave said,
August 20th, 2007 

Gotcha

Hey not a personal thing - I LOVE the site (just discovered it a month or so ago and LOVE it! I check all the time for new IRON MAN info - you guys ROCK with that)

its just that shakey camera thing bugs the crap outta me and sets me off :-)

Gravatar
August 20th, 2007 
LOL, yeah, I hear ya. I don’t know who to thank for starting that style… NYPD Blue? MTV?

Vic

Gravatar
Dave said,
August 20th, 2007 

LOL :-) seems to be an american thing to me…..??

in most movies involving a real martial artist, the story usually sucks but the fighting is pretty great - and you can SEE it.

seems like most american directors want to make it look kickass and end up covering for a lack of ability or training by the stars? The Matrix boys were the first guys to get smart, bring in a guy like Woo Ping and then TRAIN their stars and show the fighting. And Statham proved he could do just that in the first Transporter. (I am not mentioning the steaming LOAD that was movie #2….lol)

Then again, the shakey camera thing is such an irritant - Tony Scott is 50/50 for me - love movies like Crimson Tide and yet HATE some of his other stuff with the epileptic camera crappola….

Gravatar
schizoidman said,
November 20th, 2007 

The director is British, so it’s not ‘an American thing’.

Gravatar
schizoidman said,
November 20th, 2007 

And so is Tony Scott, btw. (Ridley’s brother)

So much for the “American thing”ness of the shaky cam. In fact, go back to lots of French New Wave of Godard for the origins of shakey cam. In other words, no, it’s not an American style point. MTV copied it from the French, Italian, British New Wave directors in the early/mid 60s. Though then it was done well, and for a reason. Now, it’s just to cover up lack of production value, usually, or to make a scene more edgy. Personally, I hate it. If you do too, keep sounding off, directors will hear you at the boxoffice.

Gravatar
Dave said,
November 20th, 2007 

Sorry - ‘american film’ thing might be more of an on target comment

What's your opinion? Leave a comment!
GravatarWant to change your avatar?
Go to Gravatar.com and upload your own (we'll wait)!

 Name (*required)

 Email Address (*private)

 Website (optional)

 Rules: No profanity or personal attacks.


If your comment doesn't show up immediately, it may have gotten caught in our trusty (but occasionally overly ambitious) spam filter. Please try refreshing the page first, then drop us a note and we'll retrieve it.