Review: Spiderman 2

Published 11 years ago by , Updated September 12th, 2013 at 11:51 am,

By Vic Holtreman

Short version: Better than the original on most every level.

So I’m a little late to the Spidey 2 party, what can I say? Life gets in the way, and being out of my teens and twenties, I’m over the “stand in line the night before the big blockbuster movie premieres” syndrome.

Ok, so I even did that in my thirties, but The Phantom Menace cured me of that forever. On to the review….

If I were one to give movies ratings, which I generally don’t, I’d have to give Spiderman 2 five stars out of a possible four. It was incredible, not just as a superhero movie, but against any action/adventure film. (No, it’s not Citizen Kane, all right?)

I went in with high expectations due to all the positive buzz, and I was not disappointed. Spiderman 2 grabbed me right from the opening credits, where an overview of the first movie was shown via a combination of live action shots and Alex Ross renderings. It was a great refresher to prepare us for what was ahead.

In this film it’s been a couple of years since Peter Parker (Tobey Maguire) has donned the red and blue tights. The responsibility of being Spiderman while also trying to pay the rent and do well in college is starting to take it’s toll. He may be able to shoot webs from his wrists, but he’s still gotta sleep.

Being the responsible person depicted in the first film, Peter has a tough time turning his back on crime and people otherwise in trouble. As you can imagine, living in NYC this would be a full time job on it’s own. He’s starting to fail in school, does not see his friends, and can’t even hold down a job as a pizza delivery guy. He’s extremely stressed, and it’s even started affecting his web-slinging abilities.

His friend Harry Osborne (James Franco) is still harboring a hatred of Spiderman due to the death of his (Harry’s) father which is bordering on obsession. Mary Jane (Kirsten Dunst) and Peter are still doing the “I love you but I can’t tell you” dance, which handled differently, had the potential to be extremely annoying, but was done well here.

Otto Octavious (Alfred Molina) is a scientist on the verge of inventing fusion as a power source, using mechanical arms tied into his nervous system to manipulate the energy, when his demonstration goes horribly wrong. Just as in the first film, he’s a villian who is essentially a good man who loses control of his mind.

As you’ve probably read elsewhere, this film far exceeds the first film, which I thought became rather weak once the blue and red tights showed up. Here the characters carry the film all the way through to the end. Good use was made of every main character, even Aunt May (Rosemary Harris). There is plenty of moviegoing satisfaction in the interactions between the characters, particularly centered around Parker/Spiderman.

The action scenes were breathtaking, and abundant enough to keep things hopping. The CGI was vastly improved from the first film, with only a couple of moments where it really stood out as such. There were also a few laughs, some of them inside jokes, others just plain funny even if you’ve never picked up a comic book.

It’s PG-13, and there were parents in the audience with kids as young as four, but the violence got pretty rough in a couple of spots. In particular there was a scene in an operating room that I thought was very intense not just in content but in prolonged duration. But hey, if you want to desensitize your kid to violence, feel free. Also, for those of you who care, there was a scene reminiscent of the “upside down” kiss from the first film, but with a tighter close up and a longer duration.

This gets a very high recommendation from me, and those of you who know how picky I am, know that’s saying a lot.

Go check it out, you won’t be disappointed… unless you’re like the guy behind me who turned to his friend and said it was boring. People really need to learn the difference between a movie and a video game.

I can’t wait to go see it again.

Our Rating:

5 out of 5

Get our free email alerts on the topics and author of this article:


Post a Comment

GravatarWant to change your avatar?
Go to and upload your own (we'll wait)!

 Rules: No profanity or personal attacks.
 Use a valid email address or risk being banned from commenting.

If your comment doesn't show up immediately, it may have been flagged for moderation. Please try refreshing the page first, then drop us a note and we'll retrieve it. Keep in mind that we do not allow external links in the comments.

  1. Vic, right about Spidey! It was awesome! I have never believed in seeing a movie more than once in the theater, but I might in this case. The violence in the O.R. was bloodless, if noisy and very intense. I though the stainless steel chainsaw was a not-so subtle homage to “Army of Darkness”. …I hope Iron Man does half as good as Spiderman.

  2. I dare not hope that Iron Man will be anywhere near that good. Dude, a new benchmark for comic book character films has just been established. On the bright side, we have the same writers for IM that we had for Spiderman 2!

    Of course that’s just one piece of the puzzle, isn’t it?


  3. So vic, here’s an idea for Spiderman 3; Spiderman vs. The Iron Man of 2020? I don’t know how well the Spiderman movie franchise would stand if they added time travel into the equation. But, that was one of my favorite comic books of all time. As for the benchmark, I doubt they will expect any movie outside of the Spider titles to do that well.

  4. As to the IM vs. Spidey movie, it’ll never happen, unless it’s made as a fan flick.

    And as to the benchmark: That’s *my* benchmark. It’s a curse, really… Just as I compare every action/adventure movie to Raiders of the Lost Ark, I’ll compare all superhero movies from now on to Spiderman 2.

    Really detracts from my enjoyment of most movies. :-*