Review: Indiana Jones And The Kingdom Of The Crystal Skull

Published 7 years ago by , Updated June 10th, 2008 at 1:35 am,

Short version: While it definitely had its moments and plenty of nods to the fans, there was also more ridiculousness than we’ve ever seen in an Indiana Jones film.

indiana jones review Review: Indiana Jones And The Kingdom Of The Crystal Skull

Ok, I’d really like an easy movie to review for a change…

Reviewing the first Indiana Jones movie to be released in 20 years and directed by Steven Spielberg is not something I take lightly. It’s no secret that I haven’t exactly been fired up for this film or a big cheerleader for it (our writer Niall has taken that upon himself here at Screen Rant), but I truly hoped it would be great even if I didn’t think it would be.

So was it awful? Of course not. But was it great? Unfortunately, no.

What it was is pretty ridiculous in more than a couple of places – but oh, how it tried to be awesome… (BTW, I tried to keep this review as spoiler free as possible.)

From the start it seemed like they were doing things right with the opening credits matching the style of the original Raiders of the Lost Ark, and with the Paramount logo fading into a similarly styled mound of dirt. However I actually cringed when the writers credit appeared and one of the two names was George Lucas.

It opened up on a scene out in the Nevada desert that established right away the time period of the film with a bunch of 1950′s teenagers out racing their 32 Ford painted with flames. They come upon a military convoy and a bit of a race ensues that although the movie has just started, seems weirdly out of place. Shortly thereafter the tone changes to classic Indiana Jones and I’ll admit that I got a bit of a rush from seeing the scene in the trailer where Harrison first picks up his hat in its full context.

This time the villains are Communist Russians instead of Nazis, and they too are after some artifact that will give them ultimate power. We end up at a very familiar storage facility the first test of whether Harrison Ford can still pull off the role kicks off.

Can he still don the fedora, leather jacket and whip respectably? Yes, indeed.

As a matter of fact he portrays the character quite well and with more confidence than Jones displayed in the previous three films. It works because it seems he’s been “adventuring” for the entire time that has passed since we’ve last seen him.

Despite his age, the sequences are almost believable and at the end of the scene we get to see just how “buff” Ford is in the film, making it a bit easier to suspend our disbelief.

The problem with the movie however is just how FAR we have to suspend reality. The Indy films, while fantastic in their own way, have always had some sort of connection to reality both in the action sequences and the mythic basis for the stories. But here there are scenes and plot ideas that just seem way too over the top for an Indiana Jones movie. One escape by him shortly after the scenes I just described is:

A. Stupid.

B. Looks like it belongs in a superhero movie via the implausibility of his having survived.

From there however it gets pretty decent again as we meet Shia Lebouf’s “young tough” character, who seeks out Dr. Jones in order to save his mother and older family friend. Shia does a very decent job in the film and is enjoyable to watch. They were wise to not write him as a wide-eyed “Indy Jr.” in training.

One of the enjoyable things about the film are the many “hat tips” to the earlier films that real fans of the first three films will notice. I’m pretty sure that repeat viewings will expose more that the viewer may miss the first time around. In once scene we see a familiar artifact, and in another there’s a funny role reversal regarding Indy’s and “Mutt’s” (yes, that’s the name of Shia’s character) escape from some bad guys which compares to a scene between Harrison Ford and Sean Connery.

It was also great to see Karen Allen back in the familiar role. Of course she’s much older now but she still had that familiar sparkle. It’s too bad they didn’t make better use of her in the film.

There were a few moments that will charge you up, mainly due to the familiar John Williams music and the unique sound effects attached to anyone getting punched and the good old whip. But then there are other things that are laughable, and I don’t mean in a way that they intended to make you laugh. One of them involves Shia in the jungle (I won’t spoil it) and a big one is just who the mystery is about.

So in the end, will audiences like this? Yeah, I’m pretty sure they will. Should they have left well enough alone and not milked the franchise for another film? That’s a tougher question – I can see how it could have been really great and I would LOVE to know what the original screenplay for this was like. If they make another one and bring the action and story a bit more down to earth it might actually turn out even better than this one.

Our Rating:

3.5 out of 5
(Very Good)

Get our free email alerts on the topics and author of this article:


Post a Comment

GravatarWant to change your avatar?
Go to and upload your own (we'll wait)!

 Rules: No profanity or personal attacks.
 Use a valid email address or risk being banned from commenting.

If your comment doesn't show up immediately, it may have been flagged for moderation. Please try refreshing the page first, then drop us a note and we'll retrieve it. Keep in mind that we do not allow external links in the comments.

  1. Interestingly enough it’s been 48 hours since i’ve seen Indy 4 and unlike Jimmy, the more I think about it, the movie is really growing on me. Same with any of you other guys?

    I think that probably like others, I already had imagined how this film should be and since it wasn’t, I was pretty disappointed. BUT, after remembering parts I laughed at, and action scenes I enjoyed I really want to see this movie again so I can focus more on the plot and fun dialogue.

    Maybe it wasn’t as bad as I had originally thought it was. I come to this reasoning because I have a BIG desire to go and see it again.


    When the “last” Crystal Skull fell into the hands of man, it promised anyone that if they returned it, they would find the City of Lost Gold….
    In the end, the City of Lost Gold was nothing more than a ruse (playing on mans greed) to get the Skull back and unlock the Alien from its cell.
    The treasure and promise wera all lies. The Alien just wanted to escape back to its realm.

    790, that’s not what I got from the film. The promise was that they would receive a great treasure, which many perceived as the City of Gold. In actuality, the great treasure was knowledge, which the villian received but was consumed by it.

    The movie was good but is slightly below Temple of Doom, IMHO, which makes it the worst of the series. We know that James Bond has been played by different actors over the decade; is it possible to have an Indy movie with another actor playing Indy? It would be a major undertaking.

  3. Wow Vic, giving it a 3.5 out of 5 is way generous coming from you! Before reading your full review I thought you disliked it altogether.

  4. Yeah, I think I was influenced by love an nostalgia for the ones that came before, and some doubts based on thinking that maybe I was being too picky. I probably should have gone 3/5.


  5. I left the theater feeling like a dog had just humped my leg. The dog is this movie and it’s name is Mutt. READ: LeBouf is no Ford. Lucas, give it up; Spielberg, let it go.