<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review:  Glengarry Glen Ross</title>
	<atom:link href="http://screenrant.com/review-glengarry-glen-ross-brian-385/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://screenrant.com/review-glengarry-glen-ross-brian-385/</link>
	<description>TV and Movie News, Reviews &#38; Trailers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 11:39:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/>	<item>
		<title>By: TRENT</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/review-glengarry-glen-ross-brian-385/comment-page-1/#comment-1936</link>
		<dc:creator>TRENT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2005 10:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/review-glengarry-glen-ross-385/#comment-1936</guid>
		<description>Absolutely dead-on review. I could not believe the talent involved in the making of this movie. Alec Baldwin is a joy to watch, Ed Harris was totally believable, and Lemmon, well he proved alot to me. I&#039;m a 70&#039;s Pacino fan and his performance was tremendous. I watched this film for the first time 10 years ago and certanly did not have the proper respect for the performances, 10 physical years later and 20 years more mature I &quot;get&quot; this movie, so I truly believe that younger audiences would not get it.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely dead-on review. I could not believe the talent involved in the making of this movie. Alec Baldwin is a joy to watch, Ed Harris was totally believable, and Lemmon, well he proved alot to me. I&#8217;m a 70&#8242;s Pacino fan and his performance was tremendous. I watched this film for the first time 10 years ago and certanly did not have the proper respect for the performances, 10 physical years later and 20 years more mature I &#8220;get&#8221; this movie, so I truly believe that younger audiences would not get it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simone</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/review-glengarry-glen-ross-brian-385/comment-page-1/#comment-1935</link>
		<dc:creator>Simone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2005 22:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/review-glengarry-glen-ross-385/#comment-1935</guid>
		<description>I am a huge Al Pacino fan, I have MOST of his films in my collection, including this one. This DVD has been with me for 3 years and I have never seen it yet, (as are with some of my DVDs!) but after reading this review, I have to now! :lol:
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a huge Al Pacino fan, I have MOST of his films in my collection, including this one. This DVD has been with me for 3 years and I have never seen it yet, (as are with some of my DVDs!) but after reading this review, I have to now! <img src='http://cdn.screenrant.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_lol.gif' alt=':lol:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

