Review: Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind

Published 9 years ago by , Updated February 9th, 2012 at 9:03 pm,

By Brian Rentschler

Short version: Who knew Charlie Kaufman could write a compelling love story? Jim Carrey and Kate Winslet are perfectly cast in this movie, and Winslet’s Oscar nomination was well-deserved. The writing, direction and acting are all top-notch.

How happy is the blameless vestal’s lot!
The world forgetting, by the world forgot.
Eternal sunshine of the spotless mind!
Each pray’r accepted, and each wish resign’d.

— Alexander Pope, from his poem Eloisa to Abelard

First of all, there’s an admission I need to make. Historically, I haven’t really liked Charlie Kaufman’s work. Don’t get me wrong; I like movies that make me think, I like movies that defy convention, I like twisted movies and I like thoughtful, well-written dialogue. Kaufman does well on all counts, but for whatever reason, I have never really “gotten” his style of writing. I hated Being John Malkovich so much that I had to stop about halfway through the movie. Original? Yes, but I didn’t get it. I had no need to see Adaptation; it didn’t appeal to me in the least. But this movie did. I was a little reluctant to see it in the theater because I knew it was going to be a mind trip (and trust me, it is). But by the time it made it to DVD, I knew I had to see it, and I have to admit, I was really surprised by how much I enjoyed it.


The story is set in the Long Island, New York area, and it starts out with Joel Barish (played by Jim Carrey) going to a train station. At the last possible minute, he decides to switch trains. While on the train, he meets a free-spirited woman named Clementine (played by Kate Winslet). Although the initial encounter is a little awkward, they soon hit it off and begin a relationship. The movie quickly skips over the details of the relationship (for now) and goes straight to the post-breakup phase. Joel is devastated because Clementine doesn’t want to see him anymore. As it turns out, Clementine doesn’t even know who Joel is. After she and Joel had a major argument, she went to a medical clinic called Lacuna to have him erased from her memory. Hurt and angry, Joel decides he doesn’t want to remember Clementine either, so he goes to the Lacuna office to have the same procedure.

Sounds simple enough — Clementine forgets Joel, Joel forgets Clementine and life goes on, right? Well, yes and no. Throughout the movie, the audience is forced to wonder if people can really have their memories erased, voluntarily or not. The other major issue is that part of the way through the memory erasure, Joel realizes he still cares for Clementine, so he decides he doesn’t want to have his memories erased. By then, it’s too late to back out, so Joel tries to alter his memories so he can keep them. Will Joel be able to remember Clementine? Even if he does, what will happen with the relationship, now that Clementine has a new boyfriend and no longer remembers Joel?

What I really liked about the movie was how well the relationship between Joel and Clementine was portrayed. They don’t fight all the time, and they’re not living in bliss all the time either. The relationship has its ups and downs, as all relationships do, and it’s interesting to see how their arguments can either destroy or improve the relationship, depending on the scenario. The movie also has several side stories, mainly centered around the lives and personalities of the Lacuna staff while they’re working on Joel’s memory erasure. What had me in stitches was how they had no respect for Joel’s home or his belongings. They eat his food, take whatever they want and basically trash the place without even giving it a second thought. Having had contractors in and out of my home during the past few months, I thought those scenes were hilarious.

At first I wasn’t sure how to take the side stories of the Lacuna staff. Initially, I didn’t think they belonged there; I thought the movie should focus on the relationship between Joel and Clementine. But as the movie went on, I started to realize that the staff workers (played by Mark Ruffalo, Elijah Wood, Kirsten Dunst and Tom Wilkinson) were just as screwed up as Joel and Clementine, if not more so. Indeed, the audience is forced to wonder at several points throughout the movie whether the Lacuna staff might benefit from a memory erasure, or at least some psychiatric counseling.

The main reason I didn’t give this movie a perfect five stars is primarily because I thought the portrayals of the side relationships between the Lacuna staff were far less compelling than the relationship between Joel and Clementine. A minor nitpick? You betcha, but for a movie to get five stars from me, it has to really hit it out of the park. The same lack of compelling relationships kept me from enjoying Being John Malkovich more than I did. All that aside, I thought Eternal Sunshine was excellent, and I recommend it highly. I plan to add this to my DVD collection. The writing, acting and direction were top-notch. Kate Winslet’s Oscar nomination and Charlie Kaufman’s Oscar win were well-deserved.

Our Rating:

4.5 out of 5
(Must-See)

Get our free email alerts on the topics and author of this article:
TAGS: 4 star movies

8 Comments

Post a Comment

GravatarWant to change your avatar?
Go to Gravatar.com and upload your own (we'll wait)!

 Rules: No profanity or personal attacks.
 Use a valid email address or risk being banned from commenting.


If your comment doesn't show up immediately, it may have been flagged for moderation. Please try refreshing the page first, then drop us a note and we'll retrieve it.

  1. At least I know now we have something in common Vic, and that is if we dont get a movie, we hate it. I also hated “Being John MalkovichW with a passion, and that is because I really was just clueless about what the film was about. When Asaptation was released, I begged off.

    I am not a big fan of Winslet and Carrey so when Eternal Sunshine came out last year you would expect me to snub the film, I didnt, I even went to see it on the first day. And I LOVED it. For the same reasons you’ve already explained. It made me think of my past relationships, that no matter how hurt you become from them, there’s a part of you that wants to just hold on to those memories, whether good or bad, especially if that’s all you have got left.

    I then decided to make peace with Kaufman’s work, I watched Malkovich again (I actually own it on DVD) and bought the Adaptation DVD and I love both films now. IMHO, Adaptation is his best work so far.

  2. Hey Simone, credit where credit is due… I didn’t write the review, my cccasional (will I *ever* be able to type that word without a spell-check?) co-contributor Brian did. :-)

    Brian, nicely written, I’ve had that in my Netflix queue for quite a while but I keep pushing it down the list. BTW, I happened to enjoy Being John Malkovich wierdness and all. :P

    Vic

  3. Vic,

    It’s time to stop pushing Eternal Sunshine down the list. It’s worth seeing. I didn’t have a problem with the weirdness of Malkovich; what soured me to it was how fake all the relationships seemed. They weren’t believable enough for me. I don’t know… it has been a few years since I saw it; maybe I need to watch it again and see if I appreciate it more the second time around.

    Brian

  4. I knowwwwwwwwww!!! I didnt realise it wasnt you who wrote it but Brian, I am sorry. I just woke up when I logged on and wasnt paying much attention.

    Sorry Brian. :blush:

  5. No worries, Simone. I actually consider it a compliment to be confused with Vic. :D

    Brian

  6. This movie was my favorite movie of last year. You should really give Adaptation a chance. It’s not as good, but it’s certainly worth watching.

  7. Brian, FYI, I tried to watch “Eternal Sunshine” but just couldn’t get into it. I think I lasted maybe 15 minutes.

    Perhaps I just wasn’t in the mood, or maybe watching the torturous path of two dysfunctional people falling in love isn’t my idea of fun. :confused:

    In any case from what little I saw I can see why the screenplay was so highly acclaimed… I think it must be incredibly difficult to write down what seems like such natural, rambling conversation.

    Perhaps if I’d seen it in the theater where one if more committed to finishing a movie I would have enjoyed it.

    Vic

  8. Vic,

    Sorry to hear you didn’t enjoy it. I will say that if you saw only 15 minutes, you didn’t see any of it (for all practical purposes). Part of the movie (especially towards the beginning) is a little torturous, but as the movie goes on, it all starts to come together and make sense. The last part of the movie is especially well done; it blew me away.

    Charlie Kaufman’s work isn’t for everybody. After all, you liked Malkovich and I didn’t (what little I saw). I think it comes down to being in the right mood to see it, as you said.

    Brian