<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review: Crank</title>
	<atom:link href="http://screenrant.com/review-crank-vic-507/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://screenrant.com/review-crank-vic-507/</link>
	<description>TV and Movie News, Reviews &#38; Trailers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:48:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/review-crank-vic-507/comment-page-1/#comment-2799</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 05:43:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/review-crank-507/#comment-2799</guid>
		<description>Ack... I finally got around to seeing this movie.  Wish I hadn&#039;t bothered... it was TERRIBLE.  You gave it 3.5 stars more than I would have.  Good Lord, it was terrible.  Oh, the humanity...  I liked Transporter 2, but Crank was beyond dumb.  On a positive note, it&#039;s the first film or TV show I&#039;ve ever seen that made CSI: Miami look good by comparison.

Brian
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ack&#8230; I finally got around to seeing this movie.  Wish I hadn&#8217;t bothered&#8230; it was TERRIBLE.  You gave it 3.5 stars more than I would have.  Good Lord, it was terrible.  Oh, the humanity&#8230;  I liked Transporter 2, but Crank was beyond dumb.  On a positive note, it&#8217;s the first film or TV show I&#8217;ve ever seen that made CSI: Miami look good by comparison.</p>
<p>Brian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vic</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/review-crank-vic-507/comment-page-1/#comment-2798</link>
		<dc:creator>Vic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2006 01:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/review-crank-507/#comment-2798</guid>
		<description>Yeah, although it was derivative, I found it to be at least an interesting twist on &quot;Speed&quot;.

Vic
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, although it was derivative, I found it to be at least an interesting twist on &#8220;Speed&#8221;.</p>
<p>Vic</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/review-crank-vic-507/comment-page-1/#comment-2797</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2006 20:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/review-crank-507/#comment-2797</guid>
		<description>Didn&#039;t I see that movie in 1994, and wasn&#039;t it called Speed?  Statham agreed to star in a movie that didn&#039;t give him the ability to do any serious acting OR martial arts sequences?  What&#039;s the point of that?  Sounds like he needs to choose better movies.

Brian
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t I see that movie in 1994, and wasn&#8217;t it called Speed?  Statham agreed to star in a movie that didn&#8217;t give him the ability to do any serious acting OR martial arts sequences?  What&#8217;s the point of that?  Sounds like he needs to choose better movies.</p>
<p>Brian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

