Review: Blade Trinity

Published 10 years ago by , Updated February 9th, 2012 at 8:29 pm,

By Vic Holtreman

Short version: Another series that started out awesome but should have quit after the first movie.

ryan reynolds thumb Review: Blade TrinityWell, dammit, I was really hoping that despite all the bad buzz on this thing I might buck the trend and actually like it, but, as Alex Trebek might say: “Sorry….. no”.

Blade: Trinity opens with a voiceover talking about how the movies have it wrong about vampires. Right off the bat we’re treated to the joys of four-letter words in this little introduction. It is a sign of things to come. We open in Iraq, midday, with some special forces-looking types dropping from a helicopter close to some ancient monument. In another highbrow moment, one of the members of this party (covered head to toe in protective garb) flips the bird at the sun. This is the subtle hint that these guys are vampires. They make their way into the temple find some ancient writings (which one of the members of this “archaelogical team” refers to as “chicken scratch”) along with signs of a body in the ground beneath them.

Beyond that, cut to some good old-fashioned Blade action in which our hero is taking out vampires left and right with explosions, swords and guns. This was a welcome relief from what came before. Unfortunately, Blade is caught on tape executing someone, it makes it into the news, and we learn that vampires are taking a cue from the recent election’s dirty tricks playbook to use the media to help take Blade out of action.

He gets captured by the FBI and is rescued by a couple of young’uns (Jessica Biel and Ryan Reynolds) who fancy themselves vampire-killers. Oh, I almost forgot, Kris Kristofferson is killed off. Again.

Turns out that Biel is actually Whistler’s (Kristofferson’s) daughter and has been fighting vampires since she reached adulthood, which cannot have been more than what, six months ago? Of course Blade knew nothing about this. Or the fact that there are cells of vampire killers all over the place.

Much like The Rundown, one of the things that killed this movie was a character that should have been left out entirely: Ryan Reynolds as Hannibal King. Take any scene where there is some decent action or explanation going on and insert this guy for some spurious, idiotic, cuss-word-laden dialogue to make you cringe and hope he stops talking soon. I’ve gotta tell ya, I realize this is rated R, but with the language in this thing, you’d think it was written by a 13 year old who had just discovered the joys of foul mouthed language. And considering this is rated R, why does it seem like the dialog is aimed at said 13 year old boy?

Another thing that drove me nuts is that this movie tries to be so “hip” so often that I swear I thought I was going to throw up. At one point David Goyer (who wrote and directed) poked fun at the film when Reynolds refers to their clandestine group as “The Nightstalkers” and Blade replies that it sounds like it came from a Saturday morning cartoon. Unfortunately right on the heels of that scene they rattle off another cutesy name for one of the bullets that they use.

And what is up with normal people being able to take on vampires? The main cool concept of the original Blade (which I really like, BTW) is that Snipes can fight the vampires because he’s half-vampire himself and has all their strength and speed. Add civilians to the mix who can also whup the vampires with martial arts and fancy (and ridiculous) weapons, and it cheapens the Blade character.

One last thing that bugged me, and it’s not just in this movie, is the recent trend of putting scenes in action/horror movies in which guys show skin. I’m not talking the standard shirt-off-show-muscles thing, but the kind of shots that were once populated by women. In this movie vampires and their “familiars” have tatoos either on their wrists or the back of their necks which indicate ownership. But the Reynolds character has his just above the pubic bone for some reason, which is of course shown, complete with pants lowered to reveal pubes. Now, correct me if I’m wrong, but aren’t guys the primary target audience of these movies? Who the heck wants to see that?

Perhaps David Goyer is taking on too much work, or is getting a little too full of himself. I find it hard to believe this is the same guy who wrote Dark City and the original Blade. If nothing else, this film suddenly makes me feel worried about the upcoming Batman Begins which he also recently penned.

Maybe if this had been Blade: Duet with just Snipes and Biel, it might have stood a chance at being decent. But I suppose that title doesn’t have quite the same ring to it.

Our Rating:

2 out of 5

Get our free email alerts on the topics and author of this article:


Post a Comment

GravatarWant to change your avatar?
Go to and upload your own (we'll wait)!

 Rules: No profanity or personal attacks.
 Use a valid email address or risk being banned from commenting.

If your comment doesn't show up immediately, it may have been flagged for moderation. Please try refreshing the page first, then drop us a note and we'll retrieve it. Keep in mind that we do not allow external links in the comments.

  1. I was extremely unimpressed by the trailer for this, but then again, I didn’t think much of the original Blade. It was okay, I suppose…

    When was the last time Snipes, Biel or Reynolds starred in a good movie? Their presence on the screen seems to be the kiss of death. And don’t even get me started on Kris Kristofferson…


  2. I loved the original ‘Blade’ because the characters were interesting, the action scenes understandable, and the storyline intriguing. ‘Blade 2′ had none of these qualities, but this latest installment teases the viewer with all three of these factors. What I mean is I really wanted this movie to be good, but at each opportunity for greatness it fell flat on its face.

    For example, we are finally introduced to one of the cells fighting the vampires. Cool, I thought, meeting interesting new characters can really draw you into a film. Not this time. I found myself almost immediately wanting the Hannibal King character to die a horrible death. There was one scene in particular where he was smart mouthing off to Blade…again. I honestly would have cheered if Blade had taken the opportunity to shut him up permanently. The new characters were completely uninspiring.

    Most of the fight scenes are pure kinetics. I say this in the most negative way, i.e. the fighting is very hard to follow. I think this is the result of having actors not trained in combat performing fight scenes. The editors must have to constantly cut and paste bits and pieces to hide the mistakes??

    Lastly, I wish someone would have told the producers that saying F***, does not make a character seem tough. Rather, it makes them look stupid.

    If you must see it, wait for a rental.

  3. Mike,

    Great to hear from you, and I agree with you completely. I too was really hoping that the Hannibal character was going to meet some grisly end. :twisted:


  4. See, despite Wesley Snipes role in this movie…I really loved the movie. They cheesed out on his character horribly, but the addition of Ryan Reynolds and Jessica Biel was brilliant, they made the whole movie for me, I could’ve done without Wesley Snipes all together. The only way I’d want to see a 4th installment is if and only if they were in the movie too.

  5. That was one of the problems, morgansehl, it was more about the Nightstalkers than Blade. If they want to make a Nightstalkers movie, then they should call it Nightstalkers. Wesley Snipes is the one that made the Blade movies successful; the 3rd not really being about him hurt it.

  6. RIP Blade, you started off great but lost control, it should never have lost sight of the badass that is Blade. ThAnk God Goyer came thru on Batman Begins huh? Lol Can Blade really be done for?