Comments on: Review: 88 Minutes

By: No Name Face

No Name Face — Sun, 22 Mar 2009 22:18:43 +0000

watched the movie…
i agree with review’s verdict

By: Screen Rant

Screen Rant — Sat, 19 Apr 2008 17:07:19 +0000

Thanks, Terri.

And Rob, did you actually WATCH the movie? I can understand what you’re saying and I did feel like I might take some heat for my 3.5 out of 5, but that’s my opinion and I’m sticking to it.

Vic

By: TerriOC

TerriOC — Sat, 19 Apr 2008 15:15:53 +0000

I have to defend your review, here Vic!

I just saw this movie and really enjoyed it. I thought the cat & mouse game was very well played. It was hard to figure out who was behind the phone calls and killings at first.

Not sure which “red herring” you deem over the top…

Certainly not Oscar worthy, but as you said – a good date film!

PS. The Iron Man trailer was attached to this, and though neither my husband or I are generally big Comic Book/Superhero fans, be both thought the movie looked promising!

By: Rob

Rob — Sat, 19 Apr 2008 05:18:03 +0000

Oh, and Entertainment Weekly gave it an ‘F’…I’m not sure but I think that’s the worst possible rating by them.

and that semi-popular site Rotten Tomatoes, gave it a 5%…making it one of the worst movies ever rated, lol.

By: Rob

Rob — Sat, 19 Apr 2008 05:14:21 +0000

Are you Serious Vic?…3.5?

C’mon man, I like your opinions and reviews but your latest reviews are bordering on the absurd side man, This movie is Terrible in every which way.

This movie got half a star out of 5 in the Toronto Star labelling it one of the worst movies, and Yahoo! critics collection gave it D-

By: 790

790 — Fri, 18 Apr 2008 04:23:00 +0000

For some reason Vic I kept thinking of the film “Marathon Man” while I was reading your review……
^
I can say this I will never see this movie.
^
All “the Pacino” has to do is walk into a megaplex and submit himself to watch a crap movie that’s over 88 minutes long.
How long is this film Vic?

Thanks for taken the bullet on this one.