Related Posts:

24 Comments


790 said,
March 7th, 2008 

They really shouldnt tell the audience that its from the makers of Independance Day and Day after Tomarrow.
Emmerich is the modern day Ed Wood. IMO. Superchickens = walking turd.

March 7th, 2008 
LOL. And I was annoyed to find the original Iron Man and Dark Knight trailers attached. I really thought there would be a new one for Dark Knight and had at least hoped to see the brand spankin’ new Iron Man trailer on the big screen.

Oh, and I must admit that the Indy 4 trailer was much better for me on the big screen. I’m officially looking forward to it now. :-)
Vic

790 said,
March 7th, 2008 

That’s gotta be tough seeing trailers for the 3 best films of the upcoming year and then realise your about to see 10.000 BC.

March 7th, 2008 
LOL, dude, you’re on a roll tonight. That’s pretty damned funny and it hadn’t even occured to me: Those ARE the three top movies of ‘08!

Vic

790 said,
March 7th, 2008 

Was Dean Devlin in the credits. Sounds like the film could have been helped if some of the SG1 crew helped out.
Also
What’s the deal with the slaves working on the pyramids?
Everyone knows those were built by space aliens. Emmerich needs to stop making things up… People notice.

Andy said,
March 7th, 2008 

I happened to have liked Independence Day ALOT. To me, it was a really fun movie with great actors in fun roles. Yeah, the scenario got a bit far-fetched, but it was a great movie, IMO. I also enjoyed The Day After Tomorrow, but I really wasn’t expecting much from that film. Sometimes I think people are OVERLY critical of things in a film and that takes away from the overall FUN of a film. Go in, sit back and try to enjoy it. Yeah, some movies are boring stinkers (American Gangster comes to my mind), but most have some shred of entertainment value.

That does suck that there weren’t new trailers, though, Vic. I’m actually kinda hoping they don’t do another IM one so that more of the movie is a surprise. Batman NEEDS a new trailer…

790 said,
March 7th, 2008 

Those aliens were the dumbest group of invaders I’ve ever seen. (And I’ve seen plenty!).
Day after tomarrow was just like someone asking to borrow 10 bucks. (Your never gonna see it again).

Emerich has a style that is just bad.

He sometimes has great ideas (Stargate) but bad endings are practically considered normal for the guy.
Can you imagine if he would have landed the Star Trek film gig. Holly crapolli.

March 7th, 2008 
Andy,

FOR THE RECORD:

“Independence Day” is one of my favorite, fun popcorn movies.

So I’m just critical when I think a movie deserves it.

Vic

Panda said,
March 8th, 2008 

In my mind, The Day After Tomorrow goes down in history as the only movie where the heros are running from cold (ie absense of heat). Remember that scene? How rediculous

Did the giant chickens at least look ok? There were giant predatory birds back then (not sure if the same time as sabre-tooths and woolly mammoths) so this doesn’t bother me. The rest of your review sounds about like I would expect.

At least the names aren’t like those in Apocolypto. Main character has a strong name like ‘Jaguar Paw’ while eveyone else is named ‘Pig Ear’ or something silly like that.

Gary said,
March 8th, 2008 

Vic, any chance you might review The bank Job?
I just came from that and thought it was pretty good .
at least it had a story .
A pretty good one too.

March 8th, 2008 

Vic, re: 10,000 B.C. …you’re too generous. About one full star too generous. ;)
Oh, and as much as I enjoy berating Emmerich and his truly awful pantheon of work, I’m a big ID4 fan.

March 8th, 2008 
Well you know, I just found it kind of… harmless. It wasn’t bad enough to offend my sensibilities and I can see how some folks might actually like it.

I did notice I was the only one in the fairly full theater who laughed out loud at the ending.

Vic

790 said,
March 8th, 2008 

Hey Vic is the ending funny because of the superchicken?

You can tell us I don’t think it would bug anyone?

March 8th, 2008 

Vic, you would have been in good company in the theater where Mel and I saw it. Chuckles galore.

March 8th, 2008 
790, that’s not why. Something completely different. And Snark, yeah… just made me shake my head. :-)
Vic
790 said,
March 8th, 2008 

Well then I’ll never see this film.

Chickens forever!

Jim Carey said,
March 9th, 2008 

790, why are you obessing over superchickens?
^
Mysterious Island had a superchicken, right? And killer bees.

790 said,
March 9th, 2008 

Well I just feel that Superchickens get overlooked.
They were a fierce breed of predators back then.

mel said,
March 11th, 2008 

what was the deal with the pharoh in the movie and why was he a pale white dude and his subjects at least looked north African and where did the heroes come from

March 12th, 2008 
Gary,

My goal this year is to watch and review at least one movie every week. It’s hard for me to get out and see AND review two. If you add up the time it takes me to get to and from the theater, watch a movie, and write a review we’re talking 3-4 hours per movie.

I’ve heard it’s good but I don’t know if I’ll make it out to see it at the theater - might end up being a rental.

Vic

790 said,
March 12th, 2008 

I think we all knew that “The Bank Job” would be a pretty cool film. 70’s period piece, Stathams allways enjoyable. (What’s not to dislike?).

Its films like this 10.000 BC that I find reviews are much more fun to read because deep down pretty much all us Screen Ranters knew would suck eggs. And from what read, it did!
Crappy ending too, personally I don’t think Rolland Emmerich could write a good ending if someone else wrote it for him.
(IMO the guy sucks as a film producer). His take on 2012 will suck as well… He knows no other way. Suck is his middle name.

(IMO) Sometimes its better to read reviews of crap films rather than read good reviews of good films.

March 12th, 2008 

790, you’re spot on. I specifically went to a pre-release screener of 10,000 BC because I knew I’d have a great time ripping it apart. Mission accomplished:

http://tinyurl.com/2puyuv

(Sorry for overtly pimping myself on your thread, Vic.)

For what it’s worth, I saw a screener of The Bank Job, too, and it was quite solid. Statham was a good choice, and he managed not to go all “Transporter” on us except for about 30 seconds towards the end.

John "Kahless" Taylor said,
April 4th, 2008 

I was able to see this movie for free yesterday. While it wasn’t great film-making, I was entertained. BTW, the reason D’Leh’s father left was because he wanted to find “new land”, since Old Mother had seen then end of their way of life. Also, the people of the villiage were taken as slaves by the “four legged evil ones”. I also thought the ending was fine but that’s just me.

durim said,
August 2nd, 2008 

ar yu beti full 10.000 bc

What's your opinion? Leave a comment!

 Name (*required)

 Email Address (*private)

 Website (optional)

 Rules: No profanity or personal attacks.