Resident Evil 4 Director Paul W.S. Anderson Believes in 3D

Published 5 years ago by , Updated August 14th, 2013 at 3:31 am,

mila jovovich ali larter resident evil Resident Evil 4 Director Paul W.S. Anderson Believes in 3D

Resident Evil: Afterlife director Paul W.S. Anderson spoke to the L.A. Times at some length about his belief in 3D as the future of cinema.  Some of what he discussed will sound familiar to anyone who attended the trailer’s word premier at Wondercon or the panel that occurred the following day.

As the story goes, Anderson saw an advanced screening of Avatar footage and promptly freaked out with geeky love and appreciation, and expressed an interest to Cameron in using the technology. He recognized in the footage that this version of 3D was neither gimmick nor passing fad, but a way to elevate audience immersion as an art form. As he explains to the Times, though, there are differences between his and Cameron’s approach.

Well, it’s not really James Cameron’s camera. We shot the movie with a Sony F35 camera, which in my opinion is the best digital camera in the world with the best image quality. But Cameron and Vincent Pace had  built that camera into a 3-D rig, and that was the rig that we used: the Fusion Camera system, which is the same system that Cameron had used on “Avatar.”

Anderson goes on to relate the process of turning a movie shot in 2D into ‘3D’ as being akin to colorizing a black and white film, or dubbing over a silent film to make it a talkie. Anderson says “originating images in the 3-D system is completely different than doing a dimensionalization process in post-production” – a la the recent action blockbuster Clash of the Titans which, while doing excellent business, has been reviewed far more favorably in its 2D form than 3D.

As for the Resident Evil franchise, it’s now in its fourth installment and continuing the storyline set down in the first three films – a rarity within the genre, where typically by the third film a franchise has been rebooted or abandoned. Anderson relates the versatility of the RE video games as being influential on the versatility of the films – though the movies have so far had very little to do with the games.

At Wondercon, in fact, the announcements that the new movie will address the storyline of Claire and Chris and feature several game-villains heretofore absent from the films were met with a good deal of enthusiasm. However, Afterlife will remain firmly rooted in the separate mythology set up by the previous three movies.

The Resident Evil video game franchise is very long-lasting and it’s been very successful over a long period of time, whereas a lot of other franchises have kind of floundered — for example, the Tomb Raider… franchise. And one of the things that I think Resident Evil does well as a video game franchise is that they’re constantly reinventing themselves…introducing new stories, new characters and new locations.

Following this model, the Resident Evil movies have gone from the claustrophobic world of an underground lab, to Vegas, to a wide open expanse of desert, and with the fourth movie, Alice’s adventures go global. It will be interesting to see whether or not the new locations and technology invigorate a franchise that seems to have a fanbase that outweighs its detractors, most of whom cite the movie franchise’s complete departure from the story of the games as its primary failing.

Personally, I’m still impressed that this is movie number four, with the same cast and everything.

Anderson also confirms plans to bring Resident Evil: Afterlife to the big SDCC come July – so look for more footage and info then. For more info, be sure to read the L.A. Times article.

Source: L.A. Times

Get our free email alerts on the topics and author of this article:


Post a Comment

GravatarWant to change your avatar?
Go to and upload your own (we'll wait)!

 Rules: No profanity or personal attacks.
 Use a valid email address or risk being banned from commenting.

If your comment doesn't show up immediately, it may have been flagged for moderation. Please try refreshing the page first, then drop us a note and we'll retrieve it. Keep in mind that we do not allow external links in the comments.

  1. I agree, if made 3D post-production, it doesn't look good and is merely a gimmick to sell higher-priced tickets. But if actually shot in 3D, it looks really awesome like Avatar did in 3D, and for some movies I wouldn't mind paying more for. But honestly, I wouldn't for Resident Evil…

  2. If this is shot in 3D (like Avatar) and not post-production 3D. I think this Resident Evil movie will be awesome. I thought the trailer was amazing and I can't wait!

  3. for real. i don't understand why people would hate on the movies. it's actually a good thing that it is completely different than the games. paul w.s. anderson is just trying to make it his own way. he doesn't wanna copy the game's storyline and i agree with him. so for you retarded bastards that doesn't like the movies better not go watch afterlife when it hits theaters and later comes on dvd. if you do then you should go kill yourself

  4. I tottally luv these movies! I think each one gets better & better! & It’s good that Anderson changed the story a little! Otherwise your just watching the exact same thing you’v already played! I’v met many gamers who have played all the RE: games & Love the movies! The main thing thats really diffirent is Alice is basiclly in Jill’s place! & the story’s basiclly the same really! It’s just changed enough to where there’s a good Imagination behind it! It woulden’t be very creative to make the movies Just like the games in Vertually every way!