Recent Related Items:

61 Comments


Gary says:

I want to thank Nomad for his extraordinary reporting on this matter.
WELL DONE!

Nomad says:

HER extraordinary reporting! Nomad is a chick!! *snigger*

FYI, I’ve updated the post with my thoughts highlighted throughout.

Thanks again, Nomad!

Vic

Nomad says:

Vic! He said EARLY drafts of the script.

@Nomad

Gotcha, edited the post to reflect that. I had interpreted it to mean the re-penned script, but I guess that wasn’t the case.

Thanks,

Vic

Gary says:

I stand corrected Nomad.
Sorry about that!

Nomad says:

To Gary: It’s all right, Sugar! How would you know??

Free Avatars says:

Great reporting, thank you

Grayson says:

Wow. Maybe not the REAL Punisher War Zone Story unless the author of the letter is keeping anonymous because he knows more than he is letting on, but the timeline and sources help make the case. And a very interesting look at how a studio’s evolution can frustrate just about everyone involved. In spite of all the hullabaloo it does sound like they’re getting it right though. Just give me a good movie, damn it!!!!!

Grayson says:

Vic said “I think that Hollywood directors are starting to leverage the power of the online movie community to influence things in their direction. Jon Favreau dabbled in a bit of this with the stories that he had not been contacted to direct Iron Man 2 a couple of months ago.” I haven’t heard about this. Vic, can you give me a link or tell what happened? (and yeah, it does appear Alexander exploited the power of her blog)

All right! Nomad, great work! A major tip of the hat to your contact who found all this out.

I heard one of the reasons Midnight Meat Train was shelved, essentially, was because the new studio head didn’t want it competing with his film, The Strangers, which MMT was to open in the same month (May 08).

I have a Punisher tattoo on my leg, and I have high hopes this film will rock, and not make me hide the tattoo until the next reboot. Punisher is a great character (that got old in the 1990s with 4 or 5 comic book titles), and if the movie’s done right, we’ll be able to say, “Hey, it’s better than the guilty pleasure Tom Jane Punisher movie.”

Also, in a DVD re-release of the 04 Punisher, writer/director Jonathan Hensleigh said the budget was HALF what was reported. Around $15 million (Travolta plays villains for real cheap), with $1.5 million going just to the completion bond to ensure the movie got made, no matter what.

Fingers crossed this movie rocks! There’s nothing finer than watching Frank take out bad guys!

heath

Daniel Fenwick says:

I laughed for a very long time at this part

” attested that Lexi soon inspired everyone to believe they were working on “a masterpiece” ”

Seriously how stupid do you have to be that you can be fooled in to thinking this will be a masterpiece. Ok my personal belief that this film will be absolute crap aside I can understand being fooled in to thinking it might turn out good or even great but to use the word Masterpiece is complete BS.

790 says:

Nice coverage Nomad, however this film even if done right (IMO) has a small fanbase, and will come and go.

?? A Decemeber release date dosnt seem like a good month to release this kind of film ,,, ?? 8-)

MK says:

I agreed, a December release date for this movie won’t help either from all the bad PR no matter how decent the movie may turn out, remember ‘Blade: Trinity’ was released on December 2004, it was the lowest domestic grosses of the trilogy…

790 says:

December, works great for films like LOTR, and fantasy films, but (IMO) most movie goers want to save their holiday money for better things than a vigalante film,,,
This release date sounds like a setup for failure.

Nomad says:

I hear you, guys, and I initially thought the same thing, as apparently did Lexi. We can’t look at the blog entry in which she discussed this, coz it’s gone now, but she said that apparently films of this nature do quite well between Thanksgiving and Christmas. By December 5, Quantum of Solace should have been out two weeks. There’s still some jostling going on with opening dates since Harry Potter went to July 2009, but I don’t think there’s much out that will compete for the PWZ audience. But is there anyone here who thinks the original date, 12 September, was good? Burn After Reading with both Brad Pitt AND George Clooney and Righteous Kill with both Robert DeNiro AND Al Pacino are opening that weekend. So moving PWZ was a GOOD thing.

790 says:

The Bond films have a larger fanbase, the release date dosnt matter,and if their factoring in the Bond franchise as a base point in the scheduling of Punisher, their clearly delusional.
Two different films all together.

(IMO)
The Punisher should come out in January or later in the Summer 09. Perfect the film, and come up with a cool viral marketing plan.
If they did that the film would earn an additional 10 to 20 million. ;-)

Balcony Fool says:

Nomad, you’re Lexi, aren’t you! :)

The first Punisher opened against Kill Bill 2, if I’m not mistaken. Even Avi Arad admitted that was a big mistake.

heath

Ken J says:

Wow Nomad, thanks a lot for finally setting it all straight. I heard so many contradicting rumors it was making my head spin! LOL, well, I actually do more research than that and knew in general what you have said but you actually covered WHY those things happened, I just knew they happened.

And about the director being a pain to work with, sometimes this could mean bad films because they are not open to criticism and it’s always harder to get people to do what you want them to do if they resent you, but on the other hand, sometimes this persistance can be a good thing and could result in films that are made that fit their vision, perfect example would probably be James Cameron. I think it’s pretty universal that he’s not easy to work with, and probably not the greatest of personalities, but his movies are almost unrivaled in my opinion.

Hopefully Lexi falls somewhere in the middle and not one the extreme negative of this spectrum. Although I do have high hopes for the film because of Ray Stevenson.

UnsawedSaad says:

I’m glad that PWZ won’t have a metal score.

Marcus Lawrence says:

Well, first of all, there is a difference between mainstream hard rock & heavy metal. Get that right, first. I play black metal, hate hard rock, and don’t want it lumped in, and don’t want to be discriminated against by people who might find Jack Johnson to be genius.

Having said that, I am glad they aren’t using this film as a chance to sell records for Sony or something. A soundtrack should further a film, shouldn’t date it, shouldn’t just seem like a big commercial. It ruined Daredevil, and kind of appeals to jocks or Republicans anyway. I thought it was what totally sucked about the Spider – Man franchise. People get to hear this crap plenty on the radio. If they are oversaturated with the music, they get tired of the film.

Remember that Evanescence song from Daredevil? The song had a longer shelf life than the film, and it outlived the film. That isn’t supposed to happen. The music is supposed to serve the film’s purpose.

Film soundtracks are an art form. Dark Knight is a classic, and that is one of the many resons why.

Daniel Fenwick says:

First off lol I love how you use this as a chance to insult a political party because it just has so much to do with the subject.

There is nothing wrong with Rock being used in a film in my opinion. Certain films it works with. However films like The Dark Knight shouldn’t have it that’s for sure. While I don’t think that it would ruin the film or really hurt it all that much The Punisher should probably not use rock however it wouldn’t be a big deal.

Marcus Lawrence says:

So you’re saying it isn’t true?

Ken J says:

It’s as true as democrats loving to chase ambulances. ;-)

Quit your whining and crying and stay on topic.

Anyway, I am glad they are not going to use some stupid screaming metal for the soundtrack. Putting orchestral music to action has been kind of a gimmick as of late, but if it’s done well, it adds to the mood of the scene.

daviedave_47 says:

I have to say…that was a great article. Knowledgeable, well thought out, and clearly well written. Brava! I will, without a doubt, look forward to more from “Nomad.”

I do find it funny, however, that all of this “hoopla” is over a Punisher movie that won’t gross nearly as much $$$ as people would like. The character himself is just not as marketable as some of Marvel’s other properties. Frank Castle is great, don’t get me wrong…I used to read the comic all of the time (long ago…)…but no matter how many times you “reboot” something…if it doesn’t work, it just doesn’t work. Let it go and move on to something else…like, Moon Knight, or something.

INK says:

daviedave_47,

That is why it doesn’t have a $150 million budget. The budget of the film seems agreeable with the projected take at the box office, IMO.

Ken J says:

I don’t know why though. I’ve always liked the heroes without powers more than the ones that do, because it seems like their actions are far more honorable since their lives are literally on the line each time they go out. Superheroes like Superman or Spiderman has all of these fancy powers that make them mostly invulnerable to most people, so to me it’s not that brave for them to go out and fight crime. It’s the LEAST they can do with their powers. I mean, I respect them for not using those powers to do bad, they are definitely honorable people, but I feel that those “normal human” superheroes are far braver and I can relate to them more.

The Punisher is one of those. If he takes a bullet to the head, he’s dead, and he knows that, but he goes out and takes out the trash anyhow.

So I don’t know why The Punisher is not a much bigger franchise. Personally I think it is a bad-ass idea for a vigilante to take out the bad guys that our stupid pro-criminal courts let out every year.

My favorite comic book heroes are Iron Man, Batman, and The Punisher. But that last movie was a major let-down.

Rampage says:

I still don’t understand this part:

“Lionsgate is doing its best to deliver a compromise that will please both hardcore Punisher fans and general action fans”

Wouldn’t both of those demographics appreciate a violent, not entirely mainstream Punisher movie? Don’t get me wrong, it’s great news to hear that there won’t be a heavy metal score and that it wasn’t the primary cause of the bad relations between director and studio, but why is “compromise” even needed?

Even if it’s a compromise between Lexi and LGF the question remains.

If GAH was justified in believing that Joe Drake might dump an ultra violent PWZ, then what was LGF’s response? “Okay. Make it more mainstream or else we WILL dump it?”

If LGF was pleased with Lexi’s cut, why not just release that?

Given Joe Drake’s position, it’s not hard to figure out why there hasn’t been any press release clearing up the confusion and controversy. The bad press this film gets suits his personal agenda.

This article was definitely informative and filled in some of the blanks, but it only leaves me with more questions about LGF’s actions than it answered and how much of what we saw from Comic-con (motivation and violence) will still remain intact before PWZ is considered “mainstream” enough to not get “dumped” in the eyes of Hurd and Drake.

Page 1 of 212»
What's your opinion? Leave a Reply!
GravatarWant to change your avatar?
Go to Gravatar.com and upload your own (we'll wait)!

 Name (*required)

 Email Address (*private)

 Website (optional)

 Rules: No profanity or personal attacks.
 Use a valid email address or risk being banned from commenting.


If your comment doesn't show up immediately, it may have been flagged for moderation. Please try refreshing the page first, then drop us a note and we'll retrieve it.