Recent Related Items:

115 Comments


the old man says:

Well if you want to approach the subject with science check this article. http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2005/01/0114_050114_tv_spider.html

Or this older article..

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2002/01/0117_020117TVspidermammals.html

You know it’s interesting to note comparing Spider man stories from the 70’s to todays stories, you have an abundance of stories about genetic engineering. Back then all I can remember is the lizard. Well one thing about the organ plot point is that you don’t get bogged down with showing all the work he would put into it. Additionally it’s been shown his body doesn’t hold an unlimited supply. So as a suspense angle it hasn’t lost anything. In fact it has more potential, because a tech & chemical problem is a matter of money, while a biological problem isn’t so easy to fix. I can think of other excuses to have web shooters and that is to modify the silk in a way his body can’t. Making it more fire retardant for example.

Neofcon says:

Vic

Most science fairs I have been to only have people who don’t really care about making anything unique and just do it for a grade and nothing more. Thats what i’ve been shown of the realistic aspect of a teenager in high school. they don’t care so their projects show.

Wow, I thought I was cynical.

Vic

wes says:

I believe Raimi and Sony believed at one point that they were only making 3 spiderman movies. As a result, they were left with too much story & characters to cram into it. I think they would have really been slammed by fans if they had never done venom and it really had been the last film. Even though I’m not a goblin fan, I felt that was the best part of the movie. If they had just stuck with the Peter/Harry/MJ thread, it might have been a lot better. Maybe the only reason they’re pushing for a fourth is because The Dark Knight kicked the crap out of everyone.

de ron assis says:

Plus who would get such great powers and then think they’re not enough u have to have more different powers,why not then build web bombs and shields it would go on forever and even if you’re a scientist you would be amazed at the fact of something you never thought cool happen has happened.

just imagine incredible hulk in and iron man suit lol

neofcon says:

@vic

You have no idea :P

@Wes

They’ve been planning a fourth way before TDK came out.

Ken J says:

Actually, I heard way back that Spiderman was meant to be 5 movies long with Venom being in the last one. But I guess something changed along the way.

Bobby says:

Loved Spider-Man 3.

Shred says:

I personally think Spidey 3 was bad compared to 1 & 2 but it was better then alot of crap movies that come out these days.

As for 4&5, im glad there coming out.The first 2 were great.3 was “eh”.Thats only one mess up.If all three were crap, then it would be different.I think Tobey still plays the role good, they just need less mopiness and less of those stupid dancing scenes.As for Kirsten, i dont care for her.Change her or keep her.doesnt matter to me.

And im not sure what 2 villains should be in it.But it better NOT be more then 2.

Shred says:

Oh and in response to the people talking wayy above this comment about TDK having as much mistakes a S-M3…It definitly didnt.The only “mistake” you guys said is that Two-Face was a wasted character…Uh not really.Two-Face was in the movie for at least the last 40 minutes.Venom was in the movie for the last 10 minutes.and he showed for like 5 minutes in the those 10 minutes.Also, i think they fit Two-Face nicely into TDK.If you ask me, he isnt interesting enough to be the villain for a whole movie…Venom should have been saved for Spider-Man 4.He had no reason to appear in 3.

Page 6 of 6« First...«23456
What's your opinion? Leave a Reply!
GravatarWant to change your avatar?
Go to Gravatar.com and upload your own (we'll wait)!

 Name (*required)

 Email Address (*private)

 Website (optional)

 Rules: No profanity or personal attacks.
 Use a valid email address or risk being banned from commenting.


If your comment doesn't show up immediately, it may have been flagged for moderation. Please try refreshing the page first, then drop us a note and we'll retrieve it.