• badblokebob
    "unlike Casino Royale the film doesn’t try to be too hip and trendy"

    Woah, what? Casino Royale: a slower pace, a large chunk (of an action movie!) devoted to a card game, a love (rather than lust) story (in an action film!), good old fashioned tripod-mounted camerawork... vs QoS: faster than a speeding bullet, packed with Bourne-a-like camerawork that obscures as much of what's going on as possible...

    I liked QoS. It wasn't as good as Casino Royale. And it was definitely the one of the pair trying its hardest to be Now.
  • RastaZen
    1. Connery

    2. Craig

    3. Brosnan

    I loved Casino Royale even though I agree that it was too long.
    I'm a big fan of Craig (ever since Layer Cake ) and I think he is terrific as Bond. QOS looks like a lot of fun , I'm excited to see it.
  • Gary
    I havent seen The new film yet
    but I do think when we look at both of them ,
    We have to remember this is essentially the first two part Bond adventure .
    They go together .
    you cant have one without the other.
    Now that Bond undoubtedly has his revenge we will see Q and Moneypenny next time.
  • the old man
    Yea I heard about the theme music being hung on the end of the movie. So, should I load John Barry into the nano and take it along?
  • Good review. I don't agree with you entirely. Craig is super but I thought the action-direction was quite flawed - particularly in the first-half (more Bourne than Bourne and confusing as a result). Different director next time but definitely more required :)
  • It's really interesting the way you view Casino Royale. Im in total agreement. While I like many things in it, I felt it was bloated. I also felt detached from it for the first 40 minutes of it's running time. I grew up on Roger Moore so It's hard to get used to the character volid of humor. Still Im looking forward to this new Bond film!
  • 790
    This is great news. However I'm kinda surprised it didn't get 5 stars ???

    What's the bad part of the best Bond film in the last deacade ???
  • Bonderoff
    1. Roger Moore

    2. Connery

    3. Brosnan
  • 1. Connery
    2. Craig
    3. Moore

    :-P
  • Jimbo
    Very nice comment about DC being the Bond for the Bourne generation; it was needed though. My first in-the-theater bond movie was TSWLM. By the time PB came along, I would not even watch Bond even if it were on TV. PB was the worst bond of all. The scripts were to blame for sure, but also, he turned the role into Magnum PI. Flat out boring. Even RD was better imho.

    1. DC
    2. SC
    2. RM (it's what I grew up on)
  • 790
    My favs

    1- Moore
    2- Craig
    3- Connery

    The order could change in 2 weeks,,,
    8-)
  • josh
    this is completely wrong. just thought you should know.
  • 790
    Josh what's the prob bro? 8-)
  • Joe
    Just an FYI...it's "derring do," not "daring."
  • No Man
    1) Lazenby
    2) Craig
    3) Connery
  • James Bond movies are always in good quality. If you summarize it by saying it's the best James Bond movie ever, I'm dying to watch it now!
  • jaman11
    wow. this is possibly the worst review i have ever read.
  • will watch it for sure ...
    have always been a bond fan ... cannt miss it ... !!!
  • Jimmy
    Haha. This is a very badly written review.

    "It feels like Marc Forster went into directing Quantum of Solace with a checklist of greatest hits from other Bond movies: car chase - check; boat chase - check; roof top chase - check."

    That's a checklist of action movie cliches, not greatest hits. :P
  • Jimmy
    And Q is never walking plot exposition. Walking gadget exposition, maybe, but he's usually as far removed from the plot of the movie as possible.
  • Niall
    Joe,

    You can spell it both ways! :-)

    Jaman11,

    You can have your opinion on my review (much like I did on the film) but take it easy bro. I have feelings!

    790,
    I don't like to throw 5 stars around. 4 is a great movie. 5 is for something really special.


    Niall
  • I'm really looking forward to seeing this film. I love the trailer being shown on TV. Really cool!
  • DRock
    Uh, I'm sorry. I couldn't get past the terrible, cliche ridden, every review I've ever read writing to notice what you said about the movie. Seriously, you started with the "I've been a fan since 1984" crap. Yeesh.
  • @DrRock

    Yet you managed to scroll all the way down to the bottom of the page in order to leave a nasty comment.

    Atta-boy!

    Vic
  • 790
    What's all the negative bs about this review ???
    We're lucky to be even reading this, the film dosnt come out for 2 weeks in the States.
    I'm for one thankfull that Niall posted this review,,,!!!

    I can't wait for this film now!!!
  • @790

    I cleaned up your comment just a bit. FYI, this post made the front page of Digg, and Diggers are not known for being the nicest people on the planet.

    Think AICN "talkbackers" but with less cursing. :-)

    Vic
  • John "Kahless" Taylor
    Wow, I can't believe all the negativity about Niall's review. Come on, guys, it's his opinion.

    Niall, thank you for that review. I'll be sure to add QoS to my list of movies-to-see.
  • Henry
    Too much action but the storyline carries no genuine weight.

    Feels like somebody wrote a load of stunts and then decided to hang a plot around them.

    Nothing original about it except the closing scene.

    Craig still makes a credible Bond but why not give him a chance to give substance to the character.

    Only ONE memorable sequence and that was predictable because there could have been no other outcome.
  • @Henry

    That's been the major complaint I've heard about the movie: Too much action, not enough story/character development.

    Vic
  • Ripper
    if you haven't seen the movie... then don't! QoS is a failure! lame action, questionable plots, lack of cool gadgets, too much drama, and most of all, its a 45 minute 1-act play dragged, stretched and cursed into a 2 hour film. i love bond films that why i felt cheated. why, bond, why?!
blog comments powered by Disqus