<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Propaganda seems to be hot these days</title>
	<atom:link href="http://screenrant.com/propaganda-seems-to-be-hot-these-days-brian-93/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://screenrant.com/propaganda-seems-to-be-hot-these-days-brian-93/</link>
	<description>TV and Movie News, Reviews &#38; Trailers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 01:41:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Vic</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/propaganda-seems-to-be-hot-these-days-brian-93/comment-page-1/#comment-275</link>
		<dc:creator>Vic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2004 12:46:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev2.screenrant.com/propaganda-seems-to-be-hot-these-days-93/#comment-275</guid>
		<description>I think that by now (hopefully) everyone will realize that this is a subjective film. As to the &quot;political ad&quot; aspect, considering Moore&#039;s statements to date, I think that this does qualify under McCain-Feingold.

It&#039;s not meant as entertainment, it&#039;s meant as a anti-Bush re-election piece.

It&#039;s funny how as it becomes more and more obvious how Moore distorted facts in his film he has pulled farther and farther away from his &quot;documentary&quot; stance and admitted that it&#039;s a political piece.

Of course that won&#039;t stop Hollywood from awarding this the Oscar for &quot;Best Documentary&quot; come next March.

Vic
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that by now (hopefully) everyone will realize that this is a subjective film. As to the &#8220;political ad&#8221; aspect, considering Moore&#8217;s statements to date, I think that this does qualify under McCain-Feingold.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not meant as entertainment, it&#8217;s meant as a anti-Bush re-election piece.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s funny how as it becomes more and more obvious how Moore distorted facts in his film he has pulled farther and farther away from his &#8220;documentary&#8221; stance and admitted that it&#8217;s a political piece.</p>
<p>Of course that won&#8217;t stop Hollywood from awarding this the Oscar for &#8220;Best Documentary&#8221; come next March.</p>
<p>Vic</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

