‘Pride and Prejudice and Zombies’ Movie Gains New Funding

Published 1 year ago by

pride prejudice zombies movie1 Pride and Prejudice and Zombies Movie Gains New Funding

Seth Grahame-Smith’s Pride and Prejudice and Zombies mashup book is risky material for a movie just based on the content, which falls somewhere between satire and an exercise in giving a novel’s text (and subtext) new meaning for kicks. That was before multiple actresses and directors either boarded or considered the project without committing, in addition to Smith going 0-for-2 on his writing efforts last year (Dark Shadows and Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter).

Paranorma Media is confirming an intention to produce, finance and handle foreign sales on the project, teaming with Darko Entertainment’s Sean McKittrick, Allison Shearmur Productions and Natalie Portman (who is a holdover from back when she was playing Elizabeth Bennet). The press release indicates they are moving ahead with David O. Russell’s adapted script, as opposed to using the revisions that Marti Noxon (Fright Night) put together back when Craig Gillespie was directing.

A significant obstacle that’s prevented Smith’s weird take on Jane Austen literature from jumping to the screen is the cost, going back to when Russell was directing. The eccentric and talented filmmaker was a smart pick to make the goofy premise into something possibly brilliant. Furthermore, Russell has said he budgeted for a Sherlock Holmes-style blockbuster costing $40-50 million, but financiers then wanted the price under $30 million (by comparison, Fox spent $69 million filming Smith’s Vampire Hunter adaptation in 3D).

Pride and Prejudice and Zombies movie being rewritten Pride and Prejudice and Zombies Movie Gains New Funding

Vampire Hunter has demonstrated that absurd genre mash-ups aren’t an easy sell (it grossed $116 million worldwide, but only $37 million here in the States). That explains why studio heads have been stopping P&P&Z in its tracks until both a lower budget AND bankable leading lady have been locked down. Unfortunately, or thankfully depending on your feelings about this whole thing, every A-lister and/or rising star approached so far has passed, including Blake Lively and Emma Stone (back when Gillespie and Noxon were involved).

Paranorma’s shopping the project around to buyers at the Cannes Film Festival this year, so it won’t be too long until we have a better idea of whether this monster is lurching forward (pun) or spinning its wheels in place. If nothing else, it can be read as another sign that Smith’s not washed-out in Hollywood just yet, between P&P&Z making headlines again and Fox hiring him for script revisions on the Fantastic Four reboot.

More on Pride and Prejudice and Zombies as the story develops.

-

Source: Paranorma Media

Get our free email alerts on the topics and author of this article:
TAGS: pride and prejudice and zombies

8 Comments

Post a Comment

  1. Easy sell this is like climbing Mt. Everest!

  2. This guy is rewriting the fantastic four reboot?I thought josh trank was rewriting it,i loved chronicle and have high hopes for the reboot.this concept sounds nice but so did abe lincoln vampire hunter

  3. Urgh all these genre mash up movies are horrendous! They are ok as a cheap novel to buy someone as a joke for Xmas but seriously turning them into actual films is a terrible idea just like Abe Lincoln and Hanzel and Gretal have proven

    Mark as Junk

    • The problem is not genre mash-ups, the problem is bad to mediocre writing. Abraham Lincoln Vampire Hunter was at best mediocre, it was not funny or exciting or scary, it was boring with occasional cool effects!

  4. The Abe Lincoln book was cool. It was scarier and more grounded than the movie. It’s the interpretation to film the sucked. If I were the author I would have disowned the film for butchering my book. But you can’t do that if you are the one who butchered your own book.

  5. Maybe the best thing for P&P&Z is to distance it self from its own author. And make him leave Fantastic Four alone too.

  6. Have to scratch my head how the culd let him handle F4 !
    What are those studio head thinking ????

  7. Adaptating a familiar title of a classic novel, legally languishing in public domain, then given an absurd genre twist first require keen imagination in the scriptwriting (to attract and hold the actors to anchor the production) and streamline the storytelling together with “creative” financing to fund such a risky venture–this, of course, to assauge the producer.

    Going with an unrevised script and without the anchorage of marquee talent and visionary director is making the road to principle photography a lot harder than it otherwise should be; or, perhaps, this film shouldn’t be.

Post a Comment

GravatarWant to change your avatar?
Go to Gravatar.com and upload your own (we'll wait)!

 Rules: No profanity or personal attacks.
 Use a valid email address or risk being banned from commenting.


If your comment doesn't show up immediately, it may have been flagged for moderation. Please try refreshing the page first, then drop us a note and we'll retrieve it.

Be Social, Follow Us!!