Paranormal Activity 2 Review

Published 5 years ago by

paranormal activity 2 review Paranormal Activity 2 Review
Screen Rant’s Vic Holtreman Reviews Paranormal Activity 2

The first Paranormal Activity was a seemingly simple little movie made for $11,000, and then by some miracle spared a big budget remake and released a year ago as made (with a slight change to the original ending). It was one of those movies that people either “got” and loved, or didn’t, and hated.

It went on to make almost $200 million worldwide.

Go figure.

As you can imagine, Paramount (which distributed the first film with a clever “Demand It” viral campaign) figured this was ripe for a sequel – and much like the Saw franchise (actually it’s the only thing it has in common with that series of films) they cranked a second film out for release a year after the first.

So there are a a couple of questions:

  1. Is this one as good as, better than, or worse than the first?
  2. Will your enjoyment of this one depend on how you felt about the first one?

To the first question I will say that I believe this film is better than the first one – a tough thing to pull off considering that the “gimmick” of the first is already known. To the second I’ll say that even if you weren’t a fan of the first one, you might still like this second film.

If you thought that this film will be completely disconnected from the first, you’d be wrong – it’s actually (kind of) a prequel (mostly), and ties into and dovetails with the last film quite nicely. It starts out two months before the first film – with Katie’s sister, brother in law, baby nephew and teenage step-niece the focus.

The excuse this time around for the tons of videotaping going on (before anything spooky happens) is the arrival of their newborn son, Hunter. The camcorder is on constantly – including the day they come home to find their home completely trashed. Every room has been essentially turned upside down with everything tossed about – except for Hunter’s bedroom. And nothing has been stolen.

This prompts the installation of a full-on security system, including indoor and outdoor cameras with motion detectors. We soon become very familiar with the point of view of the five cameras placed around the house: One overlooking the pool, two in the kitchen, one in the entryway and one in the baby’s room. These give us not only an anchor (every night we cycle through all five) but also give us a respite from the prospect of an entire film shot in shaky-cam.

As in the first film, nothing really major happens for a long time and the fun/scariness of it is the dread and anticipation of when something will finally happen… and what that something might be. Things start off in a very subtle way, and you’ll find yourself scanning all four corners of the screen in the security camera shots trying to get the jump on whatever may be about to scare you.

As in the first film, the husband is a skeptic – writing off his wife’s descriptions of what happened with rational explanations. Even with the recorded video footage, he writes things off to the wind slamming a door closed, or his wife not placing a pan quite correctly on a kitchen hook, causing it to fall. At first the daughter thinks it would be cool to have a ghost haunting their home, but soon enough she comes to her stepmother’s side and they both have to convince the man of the house they’re not crazy.

Paranormal Activity 2 is a second film that manages to take what made the first film interesting, and expand and intensify it. The constant cycling through the video camera shots every night with nothing happening for the most part is both reassuring and unnerving at the same time. You know eventually you’ll see SOMETHING happen in one of those shots every time the cycle starts – and you get to a point where you’re feeling a combination of being a bit bored… but relieved that nothing happened.

For me, the very things that people didn’t like about the first one (and might not like about this one) are things that are a plus: The use of suspense and dread instead of gore and cheap jump scares (there’s not a cat to jump into the shot and screech anywhere to be seen). The fact that it’s actually scarier to imagine what might be behind a door than to actually be shown it. The lack of manipulative music, “cool” editing techniques, etc. The reality-based look and approach to the whole thing just makes it hit that much closer to home – and when I say “home” I mean it. Late at night, alone, only one light on. This movie, like the first one, sticks with you in those late moments just before you get ready to turn in.

Director Tod Williams and writer Michael R. Perry (with input from Oren Peli, the fellow who wrote, directed and produced the first one) had a heck of a job ahead of them trying to do a follow up to a seemingly one-shot film like Paranormal Activity – but I think they did a fine job of it. The actors are believable and there are actually quite a few moments of laugh out loud humor from the dad/husband, who plays a bit of the comedian in his family (reminded me of myself in that regard).

As with the first, I’m confused at the decision to go for the R rating here. It’s mainly for language, which could have been easily eliminated. I’m not a big fan of PG-13 horror movies or slimming down an R to squeak under the PG-13 bar, but in a film like this where it’s all atmosphere and suspense (with some violence, yes) it seems like they made have made more money by not going the R route. Maybe they were shooting for that R rating horror movie “street cred?”

There are probably a good half-dozen real scares in the movie, and if I have one complaint it’s that overall it feels like an interesting journey that doesn’t end up anywhere… interesting. Most of the film goes by before it really kicks into gear, and then it’s over pretty quickly. If we were on a 10 scale here I’d probably have gone 7.5/10.

In the end, it delivers dread, makes you nervous and scares you, and what more can you ask from a horror movie? Too bad that it really leaves you wanting more when the credits start to roll.

Here’s the trailer for Paranormal Activity 2:

[poll id="86"]

If you want to talk about details of the film without worrying about spoiling it for others, head on over to our Paranormal Activity 2 spoilers discussion.

Our Rating:

4 out of 5

Get our free email alerts on the topics and author of this article:


Post a Comment

GravatarWant to change your avatar?
Go to and upload your own (we'll wait)!

 Rules: No profanity or personal attacks.
 Use a valid email address or risk being banned from commenting.

If your comment doesn't show up immediately, it may have been flagged for moderation. Please try refreshing the page first, then drop us a note and we'll retrieve it. Keep in mind that we do not allow external links in the comments.

  1. Pretty much, though I wasn’t a huge fan of Hostels, just seemed like an excuse to have a porn movie. The rest, I do like and agree. Haven’t seen ‘Surviving the Game’, that’s peaked my interested. Something absolutely disturbing, and although disturbing, quite decently put together (no pun intended) was ‘The Human Centipede’, crazy German doctors in the middle of no where wanting to do weird stuff are always scary.

    Also nice sharing with you. I wonder what would happen if you made a pact with a demon for wealth and prosperity in exchange for your first born, but you decided to never have a child.

    • Jimmy,

      This movie was well made – as its really and only about the demon – that Katie and her sisters grandmother made a pact with a long time ago – the pact was all the riches and happiness in this life for her daughter and 2 female granddaughters in return for a male baby boy. The grandmother never stopped to realize that one of her granddaughters could have a son and that the Demon would come to collect. A male child under 2 is a Demons greatest possession. After 70 years of waiting he came to collect Hunter going with the weakest link – Katie as his mother had the cross of the maid to protect her. Anymore questions….

  2. First one was okay. Second one was terrible. Please stop making this.

    • kOOWIE

      The second one was amazing – the first one was just a plain horror movie.
      I adored the second one wow the Demon finally got the male child from the weakest link Katie who had no protection – Hunters mom had the cross from the maid. The real story is the grandmother who made a pact with a demon to deliver a male child (as she had 2 daughters) to the demon but did not stop to think one of her daughters could have a male child and a demon waits forever in this case 70 years. If they make a sequel I would see it find out what the demon does and add more stories. Moral of the story =never make a pact with a demon for wealth and riches – they always collect…..
      Check out the movie Devil – it has a twist in the end which makes you think.

  3. Got a question for you Laurie.

    What if you make a deal with a demon for wealth and riches, and then knowingly never have a child at all?

    • Then you are in luck and you win – because if your pact is wealth and riches in exchange of a male child (which you wont have) the demon wont be able to collect however if you go with a woman that has a son or daughter and you marry her – they become your step children and if they have a male child – guess what demons consider this your male child too.
      The only way to win with a demon and this pact is to really consider being childless. Even Elton John who has a young male child at his age of
      60 would not be safe – and what were the odds of that happening right – he never wanted kids and look at it now. I hope for Elton that he never made a pact with a demon……….

  4. I Normally am a guy who enjoys the original horror film alot more than its sequel. I loved the first movie to bits but however I must say PA2 is one of the few sequels that beat the original. I say this because the second movie felt even more real than the first movie and it is even scarier. Another thing that made the second movie better is because It had a much more complex story than the original the story was amazing. The only flaw in the movie was the fact that the part in the movie is when Mantina was explaining about the demon to Daniel. While I was interested in what Marntina was saying it was too rushed and unclear.

    • Josh,
      I find it was well explained to Daniel – he just did not want to listen. The maid speaks a lot in spanish so I understood everything. It looked like she was doing some santaria protection prayer and it worked actually.
      The cross was the only thing that saved that family – but the demon being super smart went to the other weak link – Katie who had 0 protection and got possessed. Possession is an incredible feeling and sooo powerful. I was mildly possessed by and evil cult follower and I had to get help to rid of it so I can imagine what a demon can do. Not fun.

  5. A good horror movie, i enjoyed both films all the way till the end, and in both films i have been let down by the endings. I do hope they do a third film but finish at three.
    Ok storyline, but great concept and think it’s done really well also.

    Rated 3/5 good movie should defently watch it make sure you watch number 1 first tho are you will be baffled in many parts of the second film.

  6. Hello there, I found your web site by way of Google whilst searching for a similar subject, your web site came up, it appears to be like great. I have added to my favourites|added to my bookmarks.

  7. Loooong time horror fan here!
    I’m still watching paranormal activity 2. Never saw 1. But this is a terribly boring movie. Don’t get me wrong I love not seeing movies with cheap graphics and gore everywhere. But this is just boring. I’m literally sitting here typing this ignoring the movie. I’m that bored. I watched insidious before this. And I take a lot to get scared from horror films. I called my boyfriend at 1am and made him sit there listening to me and my movie. But this? It’s too slow, I hate the characters, the only one I liked was the maid/nurse lady.

    If didn’t read that wall of text. Movie sucks butt. Don’t watch it unless you’ve seen far and few horror films so you are basically completely weak like a toddler. I haven’t even finished it and I have no urge to finish it.

  8. I’m impressed, I must say. Rarely do I come across a blog that’s both equally educative and interesting,
    and let me tell you, you have hit the nail on the head. The issue
    is something that not enough folks are speaking intelligently
    about. Now i’m very happy I stumbled across this in my hunt for something concerning this.