<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Para(mount&#8217;s Ab)normal Activity: $1MM Yearly for Microbudget Films</title>
	<atom:link href="http://screenrant.com/paramount-microbudget-films-paranormal-activity-scottm-37762/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://screenrant.com/paramount-microbudget-films-paranormal-activity-scottm-37762/</link>
	<description>TV and Movie News, Reviews &#38; Trailers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 05:01:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat Grant</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/paramount-microbudget-films-paranormal-activity-scottm-37762/comment-page-1/#comment-467011</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat Grant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 19:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=37762#comment-467011</guid>
		<description>...And now here is the link http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XpMZy12kPfg Oh boy, the producer will fire me!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;And now here is the link <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XpMZy12kPfg" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XpMZy12kPfg</a> Oh boy, the producer will fire me!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat Grant</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/paramount-microbudget-films-paranormal-activity-scottm-37762/comment-page-1/#comment-467010</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat Grant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 19:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=37762#comment-467010</guid>
		<description>Hmmm we don&#039;t have studio interference yet.... This is the link for On The Shoulders of Giants - a new Brit retro sci-fi feature coming in summer 2012  Its introduced by the director.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm we don&#8217;t have studio interference yet&#8230;. This is the link for On The Shoulders of Giants &#8211; a new Brit retro sci-fi feature coming in summer 2012  Its introduced by the director.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gypsy Joe &#187; Saw VI Director To Helm Paranormal Activity 2 (Screen Rant)</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/paramount-microbudget-films-paranormal-activity-scottm-37762/comment-page-1/#comment-171205</link>
		<dc:creator>Gypsy Joe &#187; Saw VI Director To Helm Paranormal Activity 2 (Screen Rant)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 17:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=37762#comment-171205</guid>
		<description>[...] month we reported on the fact that Paramount launched an initiative to spend $1 million a year on microbudget films that cost $100,000 or less. They’re plan is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] month we reported on the fact that Paramount launched an initiative to spend $1 million a year on microbudget films that cost $100,000 or less. They’re plan is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jordi</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/paramount-microbudget-films-paranormal-activity-scottm-37762/comment-page-1/#comment-162392</link>
		<dc:creator>jordi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 14:57:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=37762#comment-162392</guid>
		<description>Will the studio be able to resist interfering (i.e. ruining) a film it feels isn&#039;t &#039;on track&#039;?

If so then great, more movies get made where story &amp; acting are what matter. If not then we&#039;ll get more &#039;cookie-cutter&#039; movies which appeal to no-one (except the studios finance execs maybe).

I like indie films, not because they&#039;re &#039;indie&#039; but because they often deal with situations and stories that categorically would not be released by big studios. If they can remain &#039;hands-off&#039; while still using their marketing and distribution muscle then all is good for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will the studio be able to resist interfering (i.e. ruining) a film it feels isn&#8217;t &#8216;on track&#8217;?</p>
<p>If so then great, more movies get made where story &amp; acting are what matter. If not then we&#8217;ll get more &#8216;cookie-cutter&#8217; movies which appeal to no-one (except the studios finance execs maybe).</p>
<p>I like indie films, not because they&#8217;re &#8216;indie&#8217; but because they often deal with situations and stories that categorically would not be released by big studios. If they can remain &#8216;hands-off&#8217; while still using their marketing and distribution muscle then all is good for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike E.</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/paramount-microbudget-films-paranormal-activity-scottm-37762/comment-page-1/#comment-161757</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike E.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 05:10:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=37762#comment-161757</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t understand why more of the great sci-fi books don&#039;t get turned into films!

So, fine, the studios want to put (a tiny bit of) money into these micro-budget films, in the hopes of an obscene pay-day at the end of the exercise. I (sort of) understand where they&#039;re coming from.

But damn it, there are literally hundreds of incredible, brilliant sci-fi books out there, just BEGGING to be made into movies. And yet, no one is going after them.

Arther C. Clarke has a BUNCH of books that would make great films, a few would even make relatively low-budget projects (&quot;Childhood&#039;s End&quot; for example.. I can&#039;t see that film requiring a $100 million+ budget).

While Larry Niven has a BOOKCASE full of fantastic popcorn sci-fi stories that would make great space opera films! Far beyond the likes of Star Wars.

Sure, Hollywood. Go ahead, put some money into these hit-or-miss micro-budget films, in the hopes of a cash grab in the end.

But please! Fire your regular stable of writers and just use the damned books that already exist and make some films with GOOD stories. (and I don&#039;t mean wrist-slasher feel-bad movies like &quot;The Road&quot;.. good as it is, it ain&#039;t my idea of an entertaining afternoon at the movies)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t understand why more of the great sci-fi books don&#8217;t get turned into films!</p>
<p>So, fine, the studios want to put (a tiny bit of) money into these micro-budget films, in the hopes of an obscene pay-day at the end of the exercise. I (sort of) understand where they&#8217;re coming from.</p>
<p>But damn it, there are literally hundreds of incredible, brilliant sci-fi books out there, just BEGGING to be made into movies. And yet, no one is going after them.</p>
<p>Arther C. Clarke has a BUNCH of books that would make great films, a few would even make relatively low-budget projects (&#8220;Childhood&#8217;s End&#8221; for example.. I can&#8217;t see that film requiring a $100 million+ budget).</p>
<p>While Larry Niven has a BOOKCASE full of fantastic popcorn sci-fi stories that would make great space opera films! Far beyond the likes of Star Wars.</p>
<p>Sure, Hollywood. Go ahead, put some money into these hit-or-miss micro-budget films, in the hopes of a cash grab in the end.</p>
<p>But please! Fire your regular stable of writers and just use the damned books that already exist and make some films with GOOD stories. (and I don&#8217;t mean wrist-slasher feel-bad movies like &#8220;The Road&#8221;.. good as it is, it ain&#8217;t my idea of an entertaining afternoon at the movies)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robyn2</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/paramount-microbudget-films-paranormal-activity-scottm-37762/comment-page-1/#comment-161625</link>
		<dc:creator>Robyn2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 23:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=37762#comment-161625</guid>
		<description>Here we go again - every studio had a division that was  developing/producing/acquiring small budget movies - and they shut them down (they were not profitable). So now (again!)they have changed their mind because one small movie made a ton of money. It seems they can&#039;t make up their minds and the philosophy is &quot;throw things against the wall and see what sticks&quot;. 
&quot;commited to bringing world-class films...&quot; ? LOL?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here we go again &#8211; every studio had a division that was  developing/producing/acquiring small budget movies &#8211; and they shut them down (they were not profitable). So now (again!)they have changed their mind because one small movie made a ton of money. It seems they can&#8217;t make up their minds and the philosophy is &#8220;throw things against the wall and see what sticks&#8221;.<br />
&#8220;commited to bringing world-class films&#8230;&#8221; ? LOL?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

