Recent Related Items:

48 Comments


And that’s why I tend to want to do all the reviews here at Screen Rant myself. 8-)

Vic

Carl Lee says:

Now that I’ve had some time to gather myself, (I was shattered after this announcement) I’ve prepared an argument for why it should’ve been nominated.

When the “For Your Consideration” campaign launched last November, it was vying for 15 different nominations. Below are the one’s it missed out on (*), with the noms it did receive.

*Best Picture
*Best Director
*Best Adapted Screenplay
*Best Actor
Best Supporting Actor
*Best Supporting Actress
Best Cinematography
Best Art Direction
Best Film Editing
*Best Original Score
*Best Costume Design
Best Makeup
Best Sound Mixing
Best Sound Editing
Best Visual Effects

[I'd like to note the "Best Picture" nominations are the same as the "Best Director" nominations. Not a rare occurrence, seeing how the Academy did this in 2005. And went 4 "Best Director" noms of 5 "Best Picture" noms in 2007, 2006, 2004, 2003, 2002, 2000, 1999, 1998. I stopped at 10 year mark, because it was getting obscene.]

Reason said it wouldn’t receive all of the nominations, but not out of the question was the top award for directors. After recognition at DGA, chances at an Oscar for Nolan became very real. He orchestrated a note-worthy, layered film but also a blockbuster at the box office–a rare achievement only done twice before, by Peter Jackson (ROTK) and James Cameron (Titanic), respectively.

He piece wasn’t an unlikely tale like ‘Slumdog Millionaire’ or escapism as in ‘The Curious Case of Benjamin Button.’ Nor was it a story of bringing elected officials to justice or seeing past people’s personal preference. It was more than that.

Unlike any of films that were nominated, ‘The Dark Knight’ played on the fears of terrorism that plagued its widespread audience. With a chilling antagonist, whose agenda was to “watch the world burn,” moviegoers witnessed the corruption of “decent men in an indecent time.” Civilized citizens selfishly chose to sink a boat of human beings–although criminal–to save their own lives, and a newly elected district attorney became the villain he vowed to fight. And finally, it was about a masked vigilante defeating an “unstoppable force” without “burn[ing] the forest down.” And the hero’s reward, becoming the villain, the citizens now hunt.

As exemplified by the 8 given, tied for third in highest number of nominations, it’s clear the Academy loved every aspect of this film. But they hesitated when it came to handing out the “Best Picture” and “Best Director” nomination.

SK47 says:

@Rob, my apologies!
BUT, Gran Torino SHOULD have been in there!

greenknight333 says:

@ STeven

Dude you are clearly in the vast minority with regards to your opinion on the LOTR trilogy..The source material Jackson and company had to use for the films were three books and appendices that totalled over 1500 pages..trying to get that into three films let alone one was a very daunting task for the screenplay writers (Jackson, Walsh, & Boyens)..truth be told they probably could have made it into four or five movies with the amount of material they cut out..I loved the books and the movies as well and although I was not completely impressed by some of the changes they made to Tolkien’s story (the biggest for me was how they changed the Faromir storyline..he was the only man in the trilogy to truly resist the call of the ring)..I thought that Jackson did a great job of allowing the story to flow through the three films and they were really thought of as one big epic masterpiece of film making..It was not overrated and nor was TDK and these films will stand the test of time and in 20-30 years if talk surfaces of remaking them there will be a lot of discussion on why? WHy remake something that was timeless and almost perfect in it’s scope and story..But hey my opinion may be overrated but a vast majority of comments clearly think LOTR was a great piece of cinematic art..

Again to reiterate my points:

1. The trilogy was nominated for 30 Academy Awards.

2. It won 17 Academy Awards

3. ROTK won 11 Awards and won in every category it was nominated in..

4. FOTR & ROTK won BAFTA’s for best picture.

5. Hugo Awards for Best Dramatic Presentation categories..

It made almost 3 billion dollars in worldwide box office for just three movies..

LOTR was a lighter story huh?

Did you see the death of Boromir?

The appearance of the Orcs and Uruk-Hai was very creepy?

Gollum was a very dark and pitiful aspect of the story arc…

A dark lord wanting to dominate all life in Middle Earth..

Shelob…

The Ring Wraiths..

THe battle for Minas Tirith in ROTK..

Frodo’s battle for his life and will to destroy the ring..

Yeah it wasn’t a very dark or complex story at all.

greenknight333 says:

@ STeven

Dude you are clearly in the vast minority with regards to your opinion on the LOTR trilogy..The source material Jackson and company had to use for the films were three books and appendices that totalled over 1500 pages..trying to get that into three films let alone one was a very daunting task for the screenplay writers (Jackson, Walsh, & Boyens)..truth be told they probably could have made it into four or five movies with the amount of material they cut out..I loved the books and the movies as well and although I was not completely impressed by some of the changes they made to Tolkien’s story (the biggest for me was how they changed the Faromir storyline..he was the only man in the trilogy to truly resist the call of the ring)..I thought that Jackson did a great job of allowing the story to flow through the three films and they were really thought of as one big epic masterpiece of film making..It was not overrated and nor was TDK and these films will stand the test of time and in 20-30 years if talk surfaces of remaking them there will be a lot of discussion on why? WHy remake something that was timeless and almost perfect in it’s scope and story..But hey my opinion may be overrated but a vast majority of comments clearly think LOTR was a great piece of cinematic art..

Again to reiterate my points:

The trilogy was nominated for 30 Academy Awards.

It won 17 Academy Awards

ROTK won 11 Awards and won in every category it was nominated in..

FOTR & ROTK won BAFTA’s for best picture.

Hugo Awards for Best Dramatic Presentation categories..

LOTR was a lighter story huh?

Did you see the death of Boromir?

The appearance of the Orcs and Uruk-Hai was very creepy?

Gollum was a very dark and pitiful aspect of the story arc…

A dark lord wanting to dominate all life in Middle Earth..

Shelob…

The Ring Wraiths..

THe battle for Minas Tirith in ROTK..

Frodo’s battle for his life and will to destroy the ring..

Yeah it wasn’t a very dark or complex story at all.

John "Kahless" Taylor says:

While I thought TDK was an awesome movie, I would not put it above LOTR. To be honest, I would not put TDK on my top 10 list of greatest films. But for the movies of 2008, TDK and IM are my number 1 & 2. Of course, I haven’t seen any of the films nominated, so that may change; I would like to see this Slumdog movie because of the praise I’m seeing here.

prtfvr says:

Does anyone outside of show business really care about the Oscars matters anymore? I don’t even watch it anymore. They always give the Best Actor first to make sure at least SOME people watched the show but other than that it’s all about who the best at doing whatever it took to convince someone to nominate their particular piece of artsy-fartsy crap. Every once in a while it’s exiting when people or pictures you liked but never though would get nominated actually do. Beyond that? Arthouse, arthouse, arthouse.

The most exciting thing about the Oscars this year is that Brad and Angelina are both up for an Oscar and how cute their little Oscar babies will be if at least Brad wins.

Actually, I think that Brad is a great actor. Don’t be hatin’. Just because he’s beautiful doesn’t mean he can’t act. He was terrific in Meet Joe Black and Interview with the Vampire so it’d be cool if he’d win.

But other than that? I think the Oscars credibility is crap and I’m waiting for the obligatory expose movie by Michael Moore talking about how the Oscars are fixed. Oh wait, didn’t he win one? Never mind.

I just don’t think the Oscars represents what other actors really like. Just what they think they SHOULD be voting for and that’s any movie where an actor gets to show his “craft”.

I’ll take the Reader’s Digest version the day after. Who won the main catagories? Eh, I knew it. Glad I didn’t watch.

JessSayin' says:

@jerseycajun

My comment was intended to point out the differences of what we ‘would’ be discussing had he not died vs. what we are discussing now that he is gone.

I agree with you on the quality of his performance. It was exceptional and mezmorizing to say the least.

Ronnie says:

What crap! The second best film of the year in my opinion Gran Torino didn’t even get nominated. I loved that movie as well, I thought for sure Clint Eastwood would at the very least get a best actor nomination.

Planned to watch the oscars this year for the first time in years along with a number of friends, but now none of them want to see it and nither do I.

I’ve seen all the movies nominated except for Milk, which I plan on seeing soon and while I liked Slumdog Millionare and even Frost/Nixon, the other two are just soooooo BORING! Seriously Benjamin Button is way to long and WAY to boring. One of the main accomplishments of a movie is to hold the people watching in their seats and entertian them even if it’s heavy fare. Movies I’ve loved like JFK in example have done that, but Benjamin Button is a snore fest. The Reader is actually pretty bad, and I’m a huge Ralph Finnes fan but god that movie was terrible and once again boring. Seems like you put nazis in the movie and you get an instant nomination no matter how boring the movie is…unless Tom Cruise in the movie. Movies can artful and compelling without putting everyone to sleep.

Even without the Dark knight not getting best picture and director nod how could that haunting score not get nominated? That is one of the greatest scores ever in my opinion. Also hope Wally Pfister finally wins one, all his movies are always so beautiful…it’s about time, but then again it’s also time for Chris Nolan to get some respect, but of course that didn’t happen.

Ronnie says:

And to everyone saying LOTR is above TDK…thats fine it’s your opinion, but none of the LOTR movies are as good as TDK in my opinion. TDK is one of my top movies of all time now and all the LOTR may…MAY make my top 50. TDK is there with my all time faves like The Godfather 1 & 2, Apocalypse Now, A Clock Work Orange, Momento, A Fist Full of Dollars, In the Heat of the Night, The Prestige, Star Wars, Raiders of The Lost Ark and a few others. A master piece imo, flaws and all (all the movies I mentioned have flaws, so don’t point to TDK flaws as the reason it can’t be considered a masterpiece, they all have flaws).

Ronnie says:

Go back and look at which movies win best picture and very rarely does the actual best picture of the year in most critics and fans minds win the award. If you go to Rotten Tamatoes the two highest reviewed movies of the year are TDK and Slumdog Millionare

greenknight333 says:

So in your opinion ROnnie TDK makes your top 11 of the eleven(can’t pick a favorite movie for the ages?) you listed…I view LOTR trilogy as one massive film and in my opinion it is tops on my list..I don’t have any other films I would place up there with LOTR..there are plenty of other films I love but not nearly as much as LOTR..opinions are just opinions and TDK while a great film is not one of the greatest of all time IMO..It is one of the greatest for 2008 along with Iron Man but not of all time….

Bernie says:

The Academy Awards learned their lesson after Beauty & the Beast, and Crouching Tiger / Hidden Dragon were nominated for best picture. Furthermore if Brokeback Mountain couldn’t win best picture, there’s even less chance Dark Knight would be nominated.

Page 2 of 2«12
What's your opinion? Leave a Reply!
GravatarWant to change your avatar?
Go to Gravatar.com and upload your own (we'll wait)!

 Name (*required)

 Email Address (*private)

 Website (optional)

 Rules: No profanity or personal attacks.
 Use a valid email address or risk being banned from commenting.


If your comment doesn't show up immediately, it may have been flagged for moderation. Please try refreshing the page first, then drop us a note and we'll retrieve it.