Related Posts:

25 Comments


Burbanked said,
January 21st, 2008 

To be honest, I was a bit underwhelmed by this. If they’re going to release a picture of the under-construction Enterprise BEFORE the teaser, should it really be the same picture that serves as a climax to the teaser’s setup?

The audio quotes about space travel are all fine, but the whole time I was thinking, “Ok, here comes the reveal of the thing I’ve already seen!”

January 21st, 2008 
I had the opposite reaction. Really it reminded me of the atmosphere of “Aliens” more than anything else, and that’s a good thing IMHO.

Vic

Jim Carey said,
January 21st, 2008 

Burbanked, I was nonplussed as well.

The words on the screen say “The Future Begins” but we have Nimoy’s voice, news audio from the 1960s, an audio equivalent of the opening to Scott Bakula’s Enterprise, and slow sweeps of the docked Enterprise like in Star Trek: The Motion Picture. I think I’ll like the movie, but the teaser? Not so much.

baker2d said,
January 21st, 2008 

This looks pretty impressive. I have never really been a massive Trek fan, although dabble with it now and again (bbc 2 reruns), so as a ‘new’ fan i think this looks pretty good. I am not deadly excited, but i do slowly anticipate its release, and i am sure my anticipation will grow.

January 21st, 2008 
Thanks, Baker. Nice to get the point of view of a non-fan on the trailer.

Regarding the future/past thing, I think they’re trying to create a bridge that long time fans can cross to get to the new Star Trek.

Vic

Ryan said,
January 22nd, 2008 

I think this trailer did exactly what it was supposed to — introduce us again to the whole rebooted Trek universe. And it has the darker, edgier feel like the early stuff. Awesome.

Adrian said,
January 22nd, 2008 

I agree with Vic, “creating a bridge” for the new generation. I liked the trailer; does what is need for a treaser(showing the respected reboot). JJ Abram shaping out to be this generations G. Lukes/P. Jackson/Speilberg.

Adrian said,
January 22nd, 2008 

Exactly Ryan.

Shane said,
January 22nd, 2008 

Adrian, I have to disagree with you on your comment about JJ Abrahms. He is going to need to show me a lot more before he comes near to Lucas/Spielberg, heck I am not even convinced Jackson is there yet. Jackson had some pretty spectacular source material to work from, along with a rabid fanbase and decades worth of artists dedicated to just drawing Tolkien’s work. Don’t get me wrong, I love the movies and he has a lot of good will from me as a result of those movies. He just needs to put out some non-Tolkien stuff to show me he has the goods. King Kong had a good fanbase and was no where near as good as the Lord of the Rings movies. Lucas/Spielberg on the other hand, have proved through multiple movies/concepts that they can deliver(say what you want about the SW prequels, #3 was fun).

JJ needs to show he can finish something. I used to love Alias but it just started going all over the place. I’ve heard good things about Lost, but I know people have their doubts about that one wrapping up well too. Mission Impossible 3 was a mess. He has a lot more dues to pay until he reaches the top tier of filmakers, albeit he is headed in the right direction.

Endri said,
January 22nd, 2008 

I have never seen a Star Trek movie.To say the truth I have only seen like two episodes of the show. But the way these teaser looks it might make me buy all of the 10 or 11 movies that are out there so I could catch up with them. Now all we need is a Hulk trailer.

Endri said,
January 22nd, 2008 

Oh yeah by the way. WHAT THE HELL MAN!!!!!! It comes out in christmas 2008. Man the really need to invent a cryochamber for people like us so we could go in it and only wake up when cool movies come out. So we could watch and talk about them, then go back to sleep.

John Taylor said,
January 23rd, 2008 

I don’t know about that, Endri. If we did that, we would miss Iron Man, TDK, Hulk, etc… :o)

I liked the trailer. When I envisioned how people would create a starship, I always thought of advanced tools where they wouldn’t get dirty. The trailer shows guys working with goggles and welders; very refreshing.

**** As long as that petaQ Kirk isn’t in it, I’ll see it!! ****

Stop being a party pooper targ, Kahless. :o)

Rob said,
January 23rd, 2008 

I almost had a heart attack when this came on cloverfield opening night, and im only 22

I can’t F-ing wait!

Jim Carey said,
January 23rd, 2008 

John, I suppose I won’t make any friends with this, but I don’t want ANY original characters in it. I don’t even like them using Nimoy for the intro. Are we re-imagining or rehashing?

Rob, your pagh is strong. :-)

John "Kahless" Taylor said,
January 24th, 2008 

You mean no original characters EXCEPT Klingons; right hu-maan??!! (sharpening bat’leth)

:o)

Unfortunately, he’s dead, Jim. Oh, wait a minute, sorry, major flashback :o)

Sorry Jim but Kirk, Spock, McCoy, Chekov, Sulu, Uhura, and Scotty are all suppose to be in it; so is Christopher Pike.

Jim Carey said,
January 24th, 2008 

John, I should have said “original actors.”

John "Kahless" Taylor said,
January 25th, 2008 

Well, we all know Nimoy will be in it and I think it is possible William Shatner will be in it as well. It looks like there will be some time travel involved.

JW said,
January 29th, 2008 

Can someone please have a freakin original idea. Lost Sucks, the new Mission Impossible movies were stupid and this looks like a franchise milking.

Oh boy because it’s Star Trek it must be good so don’t say anything bad, BS, I’m sick of Prequels, remakes and in general the lack of creativity. There’s so much more of the Star Trek Universe that could have been tapped. Instead we try to re-invent the original.

They can keep it…

January 29th, 2008 
JW, do a search on “remake” here at Screen Rant and you’ll see my general disdain for the concept and that it bugs me that the studios keep falling back on that.

But yes, I’m a Trek fan and I’m hoping that they can resurrect the brand with this movie.

vic

Jim Carey said,
January 29th, 2008 

I was a kid when TOS was in first repeat syndication. I was never impressed by the same styrofoam rock backdrops for each planet, monsters less believable than my Halloween costume, and worse of all, what seemed to be the same “ham and cheese” speech at the end of every episode.

My hope is that Abram’s revisit (somehow) eclipses the melodrama.

Random: Is it slightly “racist” to continually try to prove the “humanity” of Spock, Data, Odo, or the holo-doctor?

Dan said,
January 29th, 2008 

Lost were the years immediately following the cancellation of TOS. What a great loss for TV and science fiction. That is why we have the hope that this new movie will do what the others could not.

Unlike many of you, I believe if other original cast members are in it, you have to have William Shatner. He was huge in TOS. The only other option is to have none of the original cast.

January 29th, 2008 
Hey Dan, I’d LOVE to see Shatner in the movie. I just don’t think it’s going to happen…

Vic

Kai said,
January 29th, 2008 

I’m not a fan of trailers… but a lifelong ‘critical fan’ of Trek (meaning I started with the original and have been initially very skeptical of each new movie or series since). I like this one. I think it is a great tie-in… nicely binding Trek history to OUR history. The 60s audio as background for the shot of the welder’s face, the expression in his eyes, is perfect IMHO. I think it is a good beginning.

VulcanSteve said,
February 16th, 2008 

Incredible !! It may yet save the TREK franchise and even rebirth it for a new generation.

I remember being an cartoon animator in 1990, the whole studio used to stop work to watch the latest VHS recording of the latest TNG episodes. Deep Space Nine and Enterprise were flogging a tired horse, Voyager had some engaging moments, but no movie had yet captured the essence of the original series. However this looks absolutely brilliant.

Danw said,
June 1st, 2008 

Rubbish!! looks impressive, agreed, but, Starships arent made on the earth, and would not be welded together by hand!!??!!!! come off it! there would at least be a machine to make the ship welded or not.

What's your opinion? Leave a comment!

 Name (*required)

 Email Address (*private)

 Website (optional)

 Rules: No profanity or personal attacks.