Recent Related Items:

29 Comments


Rachel says:

If it is the same ship, then this is just an Abram’s movie using Star Trek imagery, not a Star Trek movie.

~ RF

GWCS says:

Rachel,
There is no indication that this is anything else but a “Star Trek” movie. This is a new vision, no less Star Trek. You certainly didn’t expect them to create a cheezy, boxy, ridiculous, 1960s set design, did you? This enterprise more resembles what it should have looked like in the many years preceeding the motion picture. You may judge it before it can play out, and deny in your mind that it is “Star Trek” (and many have misjudged Voyager and Enterprise), but is IS STAR TREK. CBS nor Paramount would never have given the go-ahead (nor would Nimoy have appeared) if it wasn’t.

I’m 40, have viewed EVERY EPISODE of trek, including the disrespected series’ that I felt simply weren’t given their fair shake for their combined 11-year runs, and I am ready for a “reboot.” It’s about bloody time.

Give it a chance, and i think you will be just as big a fan. I really do, RF. I look forward to you really loving it.

GWCS
Boone, North Carolina

Dennis Jacobs says:

ok, guys, I have seen the trailer. The ‘hanger bay.? that is a earth based hanger for shuttles, or it is on the space station - it ISNT the hanger deck - it is TOO SMALL. The original enterprise could hold 6 shuttlecraft squeezed in, so the new Enterprise isnt that much bigger…

David says:

Brian;
Very nice review. I especially appreciate the spoiler warnings (”the first scene… etc.). My intention is too avoid all spoilers the best I can before the films release. Ignorance is bliss I’ve heard.

It seems to me that this “reboot” or “re-imagining” of Star Trek can be compared to a new band doing a cover of some popular classic song with three possible outcomes:
1) It can be done as close to the original as possible so it’s hard to tell the difference.
2) It can get the new bands personal touches so that it’s obvious and has a fresh and enjoyable updated feel.
3) It can be so different that it takes several times before you realize it’s the same song.

Outcome #1 Would be a box office flop! If it was modeled after TOS it would be seen as a retro tribute good for one pass, and TNG would be the same old hammer nailing the coffin closed.

Outcome #3 would have incurred the wrath of Trek fans en masse and the studio would close the doors forever (or for another 40 years :( ).

I’m betting we’ll get outcome #2 (um… duh!). And even though I’ve been a Trekkie for 30+ years I’m looking forward to new actors bringing there individual touches to characters I grew up with. If they were talentless civic theater wannabes I’d be afraid to see it. But they are talented people and I for one am going to give them a chance.

I’ve got my salt and ketchup ready though. In case I have to eat my words ;) .

McCoy says:

David….I think JJ’s giving us more of a 2.5 where I would have wanted a 1.5.

I like most about it except the ship and the bridge. They fall under the “change for change’s sake” category. Could have designed them much closer to the original. It’s science fiction.

Adrian says:

IMHO, believe the the New Kirk would be a great fit for Steve Rogers/Captian America…

Adrian says:

Sorry, how to get that out of the way. On the suject at hand, the film looks very promising and fresh. Looking forward to seeing how honorable the film is to the orginial.

Gary says:

Sounds very Promising.
Thanks Brian.

One day I’ll be able to take the time to dialog the level of “Treker” that I am but I’ll save that for another commentary track. The BIG question I ask is this:

What are YOUR thoughts on the recast of - THE ENTERPRISE?

Of the “complaints” I get - the interior of the ship is the one I see that is the most regular and one that everyone from lowly “stick-on Spock” fan, to the likes of a television and movie production designer call “not right.”

Thoughts?

Page 2 of 2«12
What's your opinion? Leave a Reply!
GravatarWant to change your avatar?
Go to Gravatar.com and upload your own (we'll wait)!

 Name (*required)

 Email Address (*private)

 Website (optional)

 Rules: No profanity or personal attacks.
 Use a valid email address or risk being banned from commenting.


If your comment doesn't show up immediately, it may have been flagged for moderation. Please try refreshing the page first, then drop us a note and we'll retrieve it.