However, in order to emulate the mass appeal of Star Wars, while FAITHFULLY reinventing the Trek franchise, Abrams needed a script with an equal mix of high adventure, themes of racial harmony, good versus insidious evil, kick-ass F/X, eye-widening technology, a hefty dose of emotion and enough tongue-and-cheek to lighten the mood, should it get too heavy. In order to cook up a story with that many necessary ingredients, Abrams tapped some of the best cooks in Hollywood’s sci-fi kitchen, including Lost co-creator (a confessed Trekker); M:I-3 and screenwriters Bob Orci (a hardcore Trekker) and Alex Kurtzman (a quasi-Trekker like myself)–all of them longtime members of the J.J. Abrams collaborative team.

…And what a story Abrams and Co. have cooked up. We don’t do spoilers here at Screen Rant (if you want to read the full script synopsis you can do so here), but I will say that Abrams’ reboot explores the early days when the original crew of the Enterprise first meet and set out on their mission to “boldly go where no man has gone before.” At the forefront: the fledgling bond that ultimately grows into the glorious bromance between impetuous young Captain, James T. Kirk, and his second-in-command, the stoic Vulcan, Mr. Spock. The action revolves around an imperious and warmongering alien race known as the Romulans (imagine Star Wars‘ Sith Lords crossed with LOTR’s orcs); their evil general, Nero (Eric Bana, above); and a time-travel plot-twist that results in certain members of the Enterprise bumping into a familiar face of the Star Trek universe.
Before traumatic time-warp memories of Star Trek: Generations have you tearing out your hair in patches, consider Leonard Nimoy, the original Mr. Spock’s, glowing endorsement of the film:
”I thought Spock was behind me. I had no unfulfilled wishes,” Nimoy says. But Abrams was persuasive. ”I felt J.J. and his writers had a very strong sense of who the characters were and how they should work. To find a team that was interested in putting it all back together was very exciting.”
But enough about the old: what about the new?


As you can see from the photos above, the new Enterprise crew is a pretty good embodiment of the characters that were created before some of them were even twinkles in their daddies’ eyes. Heroes’ Zachary Quinto (Spock) has already had the Spock-torch officially passed to him from Nimoy (”I called J.J. and immediately told him [Zach] was going to work [Nimoy said].”) Actor Chris Pine (who had that unforgettable heart-to-heart monologue with Ben Affleck’s bullet-ridden corpse in Smokin’ Aces), seems to be holding his own as well, redefining William Shatner’s Captain Kirk for a new generation. According to EW: “Watching Pine and Quinto work on set — and seeing some of their work on screen — suggests both may deliver star-making performances.”
And with co-stars such as Simon Pegg (Scotty), John Cho (Mr. Sulu), and Zoe Saldana (Uhura), who have all proven in the past that they have the necessary acting chops to do right by their characters, Star Trek is shaping up to be worthy of Abrams’ optimism–at least from a performance standpoint.
But the proof, as they say, is in the preview. Star Trek will launch its first full trailer before the next James Bond installment, Quantum of Solace, on November 14. How that trailer is received by the general public will determine who and how many line up at the theater to see the Enterprise go to warp speed when Star Trek hits theaters on May 8, 2009. (Was it prudent for Paramount to move the release date from this Christmas to next summer? Only the box office will tell.)
For now, I’ve hopefully left you fanboys and non-fanboys alike with a clearer indication of what is warping your way next May. Again, you can read the Entertainment Weekly feature in its entirety by going here, but remember, there are spoilers. When you’re ready, let us know what you think about Star Trek’s new makeover, which installment of the series you loved best, and how you feel about Abrams and Co. waiting so long to give us a bloody peek at it!
Source: Entertainment Weekly




34 Comments
Im really liking what Im reading about this movie. I think it has the potential for greatness. Im curious though
For all you diehard trekkies here on Screenrant: Does reading JJ’s comments change your opinion of this movie either way?
WOW! In those pictures above comparing the new actors to the old, Pine REALLY looks like Kirk, moreso than in any other picture I’ve seen. The bridge is still irking me, but I am really looking forward to this movie. I just wish that they kept it as a Christmas release.
As a 40-something dude, Star Trek has been around most of my life. I have given time to view all the tv series and movies with great respect to the creators of those media. I look forward to seeing Abrams’ vision in creating a new beginning to a classic ideal. I say give the guy a chance and hope that the legacy of Roddenberry is not tarnished.
@Deadpool
I’m with “Battle.” I’m a lifelong Trekkie (no, you don’t have to call me a “Trekker”) and I believe that over the decades the franchise has become a shadow of what it could be. That is of course due mainly to two people Rick Berman and Brannon Braga (mainly Berman) who drove nail after nail into the coffin with their decisions on where to take the franchise.
I believe that continuing to move forward in the “Next Generation” universe would simply continue the trend of diminishing box office for any future films and that this is actually a brilliant idea.
God knows, I’m stunned hearing myself say that I actually think the terms “reboot” and my beloved “Star Trek” belong together, but I think this is probably a brilliant idea for reinvigorating the Star Trek brand.
Sure, there are things I’m not overly happy with, like the white, bright Enterprise bridge, the fact they didn’t go with Paul McGillion from Stargate: Atlantis for Scotty, and some of the comments made in the EW article mentioned above about the opening of the movie shaking up long-time fans’ perceptions.
I’ve been cautiously optimistic about this since I first heard about it and I remain so.
JJ & Co. PLEASE don’t let me down!!!
Vic
”The movie,” Lindelof says, ”is about the act of changing what you know.”
Yeah, I wonder who would have a problem here with that quote??
In every directors contract there is a clause that says s/he will substantially shoot the “approved” script.
Thought that might edify some.
I’ll endeavor to wait for the review..
I’m coming at this from the perspective of someone who wasn’t around fro the original broadcasts of the original series but who grew up watching is with his mother. I was reluctant to give TNG a shot, and yet it’s become my favorite of the 6 Trek series.
That said, this article lowered my opinion of this movie even further. I hate the new look for the classic bridge, and I don’t like the description of the new hand phasers. While the fact that this was written by Orci and Kurtzman alreasy makes me unwilling to give this movie a chance, the fact that this team is showing such disrespect for the look of the classic series would have turned me off to the movie.
They should have simply moved forward instead of going back.
My only dissapointment with the article was that the script wasnt contained therein.
Im with everyone on the bridge thing. I dont like the bright white, the glass. However, I dont think they should do it exactly like the original either. I think with the reboot, the iconic bridge was in need of a reboot too. They couldve modeled it after the original, just with some different colors, maybe a minor tweak or two.
Other than that, I think this movie is going to be all right!
Nothing says “I really don’t know STAR TREK” than someone who calls “Mr. Spock” – - “Dr. Spock”.
I’m very mixed on this. The bridge is ghastly, and some of the casting doesn’t appeal at all.
Then again other casting looks spot on. I’m even starting to come round to Pegg as Scotty (although agree on the bloke from Atlantis would have been a really good choice).
I am looking forward to this with caution.
It’s Mr.Spock not Dr.Spock
great article Kofi,
Having Damon Lindelof be a big part of the writing helps ease my worries about Orci and Kurtzman.
Can’t wait till the 14th!
We havent seen the complete bridge ,
Just snippets of it.
As for Dr. Spock,
I am sure Kofi didnt mean anything by it .
A bit of humor perhaps ?
When Roddenberry named the Vulcan character, he did not (or so he claimed) know of noted pediatrician Dr. Benjamin Spock…yet Ben Spock was to the 60s era what Dr. Phil is to the current day.
Oh, and if anyone’s interested…
A friend sent me a LOLcats-texted redo of a Classic Trek episode:
http://granades.com/2007/05/02/loltrek/
Sorry, that “Dr. Spock” thing has always been an issue with me. Lumping my Vulcans in with my McCoys. @ Paul Sheppard: Nothing says “I don’t know Star Trek” like clearly stating in the context of the article “I DON’T KNOW STAR TREK [THE ORIGINAL SERIES].”
LOLcats version of Classic Trek episode here:
http://granades.com/2007/05/02/loltrek/
A friend sent it…
No biggie Kofi.
Good article.
Damn… I caught one of the doctor references when I edited the post, didn’t think there would be more than one.
Vic
Well technically, to be a science officer wouldn’t MR. Spock have to have some PHD in science??
Of course I guess that a level of education equivalent to a PHD on earth my not warrant the title, on Vulcan. Being half Vulcan, perhaps he thought it was a outward human pretension to demand to be called, doctor. Wouldn’t invalidate or make the title inaccurate though.
I dont know if anyone has seen this, but I just read a snippet of an article from AICN saying that Kirk wears the black through a large portion of the film. Space Cadet colors in Abrams Star Trek universe. Does this settle anything?
Well, it’s easy to see that the others have the same tee shirt under the tunics.
Black is a power color. Police officers wear it… Personal choice, his crew knows who he is.
A picture can tell you a lot of things but it can’t always tell you the circumstances in which it is taken. Look at the captains left arm. It looks like it’s in a cast. With the doctor nearby, do you think they just rushed up from sick bay?? You see, you can read and imagine things that may not be there.
I am ready!!! Beam me up!!!
Interesting blog post from Shaun of the Dead Director and friend of Simon Pegg:
Quote:
Wednesday, October 15, 2008
I am a lucky bastard…
Yesterday I saw a film that does not get released until next summer.
I can’t say much more than that, except that it delivers all the goods sorely lacking from a certain trio of prequels.
Exciting stuff.
That is all.
E
p.s. I did also meet Henry Winkler in the parking lot. These two events were unrelated. Other than it being further evidence of me being a lucky bastard.
p.p.s. Thanks to CINEMATICAL (and Joel who sent me this link) for naming SHAUN OF THE DEAD as their funniest horror movie. The competition was very stiff too, especially the films ranking second and third.
End Quote
It may just be me, but it seems the look of the new bridge is an attempt to be a futuristic progression of a realistic battleship bridge, without the windows of course.
“The Enterprise still has a saucer front section and pronged rear engines, but now comes tricked out with credibility-enhancing details.”
This does nothing to reassure me that J.J. has his finger on the fading pulse of the franchise once known as ‘Star Trek’.
“Silver gizmos with spring loaded barrels that revolve and glow in transition from ’stun’ to ‘kill’.
This sounds a little like a ‘tricked out credibility-enhanced’ phaser from TOS episode ‘The Cage’
However I am reassured to learn that J.J. & CO. is made up of mostly Trekkies of some degree. Of course the problem/challenge is to make a movie in a franchise that has such a long and varied history that will appeal to audiences across the board. As an old Trekkie I get the feeling I’ll be disappointed by some of the things I’ve come to expect from Trek that wont be in the movie. To me though, the measure of any movie is will I be entertained, and strongly expect to be ‘entertained’ to a greater degree than some of the previous Trek movies. Does anyone remember the old saying about the TOS movies: “Even numbered Trek movies don’t suck!” Lets hope J.J. puts that one to rest.
Well, the even-numbered-Trek-thingy got disentigrated by disruptors with ST10: Nemesis.
while it was a little troubling to hear the writers talk about changing what we know about star trek. i don’t like the bridge either… but i do think the movie will be worth seeing. maybe it won’t be everything and old star trek fan would want but maybe it will be what a new generation of future trekkies will need to keep the franchise going
Can’t wait to see the movie!
Lorraine Messina
lorrainemessina.blogspot.com
i swear if they even reference Tribbiles in this film my head will X_plode !
god knows they wont but ya never know.
Maybe a variation on a drinking song?
1 fuzzy tribble in the grain,
One tribble in grain
Spread some cheer, give him a beer
Two drunk fuzzy tribbles in the grain
2 drunk fuzzy tribbles in the grain
Two tribbles in grain
Spread some cheer, give them more beer
Ten drunk fuzzy tribbles in the grain
Oh no WAR-MACHINE, I heard the relief navigator was named Lieutenant Tribble.
Wasn’t that Ensign Harcourt Fenton “Harry” Tribble?
Wasn’t that Lieutenant Harcourt Fenton “Harry” Tribble?
Yes PhotoShopLifter Dan, JG, I believe.

What's your opinion? Leave a Reply!
Go to Gravatar.com and upload your own (we'll wait)!