Natalie Portman ‘In Active Negotiations’ To Star In ‘Gravity’

Published 5 years ago by , Updated July 12th, 2013 at 10:51 am,

Director Alfonso Cuarón’s new sci-fi venture, Gravity, sounds promising but has struggled to secure a leading lady – which is a pivotal role to fill, since the gal in question will be the only character onscreen for most of the film (a la Tom Hanks in Castaway).

Warner Bros. reportedly wanted Sandra Bullock to star as the female protagonist in Gravity after Angelina Jolie chose to pass on the project.  Natalie Portman was offered the lead a week or so prior to the announcement about Bullock, and is now – according to Heat Vision“in active negotiations” to take on the part.

Portman has been in the limelight of late as she continues to gain accolades for her tour-de-force performance in possible Superman director Darren Aronofsky’s Black Swan.  The Oscar-nominated actress would certainly make for a compelling lead in Gravity – but what effect would her coming onboard for Cuarón’s latest have on the film’s budget?

Gravity was originally being planned as an $80 million epic that would be 60% CGI and feature a 20-minute single shot opening sequence – along with a handful of elaborate tracking shots (which Cuarón became famous for using after Children of Men).  It is for this reason that Warner Bros. has reportedly been adamant about the casting of a more bankable name like Bullock or Jolie in the lead.

Will Gravity be restructured as a lower-budget affair if Portman signs on?  It would not be the first time that an acclaimed director had to scale back their plans for an expensive, FX-heavy project – Darren Aronofsky’s The Fountain (see below) is one example that immediately comes to mind.

The Fountain Natalie Portman In Active Negotiations To Star In Gravity

Could ‘Gravity’ go the way of ‘The Fountain?’

Gravity is foremost a thrill ride that revolves around a single individual’s attempts to stay alive within the confines of an enclosed space – specifically, that of a spaceship racing back to Earth.  As the recent indie release Buried demonstrated (read Screen Rant‘s review here), this premise can make for a riveting experience if it executed properly – and Cuarón is more than capable of doing that.

The bigger concern is whether or not Gravity could become trapped in development purgatory if Warner Bros. and Cuarón are unable to agree on the scale of the project.  That seems unlikely at this juncture, but such a turn of events would not be without precedence in Hollywood.

We will keep you updated on the status of Gravity as more news comes our way.

Source: THR

TAGS: Gravity
Get our free email alerts on the topics and author of this article:


Post a Comment

GravatarWant to change your avatar?
Go to and upload your own (we'll wait)!

 Rules: No profanity or personal attacks.
 Use a valid email address or risk being banned from commenting.

If your comment doesn't show up immediately, it may have been flagged for moderation. Please try refreshing the page first, then drop us a note and we'll retrieve it. Keep in mind that we do not allow external links in the comments.

  1. WB should really just let Cauron do what he wants and quit trying to bank on names. I would rather watch portman over bullock or jolie any day, and especially in a Cauron film. Im stoned to here that he will be utilizing long tracking shots again.

  2. As long as the film comes good. The fountain was owsm in the present form itself. I thk high budget would have maybe ruined it.. Or maybe not..