Recent Related Items:

5 Comments


Brian says:

Enforcement of the existing rules would be a better way to go, but given the “I’m not paid enough to care” attitude of most theater employees, something more drastic would seem to be necessary. I have to agree that most moviegoers are extremely oblivious and/or inconsiderate.

Brian

Shannon B. says:

It would be great if the theaters had enough income to post an usher in every “room” to police the audience members.
We were in the critical (and emotional) climax of “The Cronicles of Narnia” when, not only did a cell phone ring, but the guy answered and proceeded to carry on a conversation at normal speaking volume. (I could hear the person on the other end, too!) :x
When I made a comment (politely), he had the nerve to get angry at me and tried to start something.
He appologized after the movie, but it the experience had already been interrupted for everyone else. :roll:
And this is becoming not so unusual. So, yes, something must be done.

Zipper Stevens says:

I saw Batman Begins last summer and some guy about a dozen rows in front had his cellphone out text messaging. It was quiet, but the light on the little screen was a LOT brighter than the theatre screen. I almost threw my Skittles at him, but I wouldn’t waste precious Skittles on an idiot.

Cell phone jamming? Only if it’s down someone’s throat… :twisted:

Randy says:

As far as I know there are two types of jamming, active and passive. Active jamming involves interferring with the transmission or reception of radio signals and as such it is illegal. Passive jamming (more appropriatly referred to as shielding) prevents the signals from passing through the theatre wall and is legal as far as I know. I think that theatres are more concerned with the liability issues should your sitter or doctor be unable to reach you. Personally I think they should shield the theatres and post as much in the lobby. If self policing worked, we’d all drive 65 on the freeway.

Vic says:

Randy, thanks for clarifying that… I *thought* that it was legal to block via passive jamming.

Vic

What's your opinion? Leave a Reply!
GravatarWant to change your avatar?
Go to Gravatar.com and upload your own (we'll wait)!

 Name (*required)

 Email Address (*private)

 Website (optional)

 Rules: No profanity or personal attacks.
 Use a valid email address or risk being banned from commenting.


If your comment doesn't show up immediately, it may have been flagged for moderation. Please try refreshing the page first, then drop us a note and we'll retrieve it.