‘Mission: Impossible IV’ May Be A Reboot With A New Title

Published 4 years ago by , Updated March 9th, 2013 at 1:45 pm,

mission impossible 4 logo Mission: Impossible IV May Be A Reboot With A New Title

Just yesterday the rather welcome news surfaced that Jeremy Renner had joined the cast of Mission: Impossible IV to star opposite Tom Cruise in a yet-to-be-named role (Renner apparently beat out three younger actors, including his fellow Hurt Locker star, Anthony Mackie).

The idea is that if it ever gets to the point where Cruise (and his character Ethan Hunt) stops being the focus of the Mission: Impossible franchise then it can easily be handed over to Renner’s character.

Renner has joined the franchise alongside returning stars Cruise, Ving Rhames, and Simon Pegg, with Noomi Rapace (The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo) also potentially starring. Add to all that the return of  J.J. Abrams as producer and it appeared that everything was on course for a straight continuation of the Mission: Impossible series.

Well, in an update to the story it’s being reported by Variety from “insiders” that Paramount is aiming to not just to make another Mission: Impossible, but to have the next film be a reboot of sorts, one that doesn’t continue on from where the third movie left things off.

I’m not exactly sure how it can be a reboot if Cruise and other familiar faces from the franchise are returning, but changing the  name is certainly a good start. Insiders state that Paramount may drop the “Mission: Impossible” title, much the same away that The Dark Knight didn’t have “Batman” in its title.

If the name-changing rumor is true then it’s certainly a bold move, but one I can’t see hurting M:I 4‘s box office potential. The Dark Knight went with a Batman-less name and we didn’t exactly see that fail at the box office having passed the $1 billion mark! (Though it did take some (slow) people a bit long to release that it was actually a Batman flick).

Mission Impossible 4 Tom Cruise and Jeremy Renner Mission: Impossible IV May Be A Reboot With A New Title

Plot details for the fourth Mission: Impossible are being kept under wraps for the time being, however, those familiar with the project say that, “the story brings a fresh perspective to the action-spy franchise.” This only makes the possibility of a franchise reboot that much stronger – I’m curious to see what direction they take the series in while (hopefully) still keeping the excitement and thrills high.

I’m personally a fan of the Mission: Impossible franchise: the first one is solid (and holds up surprisingly well after 14 years); the second is a lot of fun (it’s a guilty pleasure); and the third movie is arguably the best of the series. It’s no surprise they want to make another installment and the idea of bringing a fresh approach to it will likely be a good thing, in my opinion.

Mission: Impossible IV will shoot in Vancouver, Prague, Dubai and parts of the U.S. under the direction of Brad Bird (The Incredibles). It already has a scheduled release date of December 16th, 2011.

Source: Variety

Get our free email alerts on the topics and author of this article:
TAGS: mission impossible 4

43 Comments

Post a Comment

GravatarWant to change your avatar?
Go to Gravatar.com and upload your own (we'll wait)!

 Rules: No profanity or personal attacks.
 Use a valid email address or risk being banned from commenting.


If your comment doesn't show up immediately, it may have been flagged for moderation. Please try refreshing the page first, then drop us a note and we'll retrieve it.

  1. Good points Mike.

    That’s one of the problems about Tom Cruise he wants top billing in most all his films. He also has to have his face on the movie poster.
    Your totally right about MI being about a team. it seems like Cruise is just using the Mission Impossible name to wedge himself into a action franchise.

    Its lame and that’s why I’ve never been a fan of him or this franchise.

    • that is the reason i don`t like the new mission impossible series.i gave each instalment a try but even though they were sucessful in the box office they were an insult to the mission impossible series and the interlocking team aspect of it (i am capitalizing this intentually because it is an important point)ALL THROUGH THE STORY.

  2. Mike E

    You kind of got that a little bit in the first one and some more in the third, but overall it was the Tom Cruise show (hence why it was only his face on the posters).

    Mission Impossible 2 though, that was the worst for not having much team play, it was almost all Cruise. At least 3 had the Vatican mission.

  3. Actually I can remember every person on the teams in films 1-2, not so much 3 because it sucked worse than a $2 hooker.

  4. Will definitely be skipping this one.