Comments on: And The Villain In Iron Man 2 Is…

By: Is This Crimson Dynamo From Iron Man 2? - Screen Rant

Is This Crimson Dynamo From Iron Man 2? - Screen Rant — Wed, 30 Sep 2009 13:54:48 +0000

[...] speculation that he would be playing a Russian villain, whose description seemingly pointed towards The Crimson Dynamo as Iron Man’s next dance [...]

By: Mickey Rourke NOT The Crimson Dynamo In Iron Man 2 - Screen Rant

Mickey Rourke NOT The Crimson Dynamo In Iron Man 2 - Screen Rant — Wed, 04 Feb 2009 03:56:02 +0000

[...] a month ago, the exciting news broke that Mickey Rourke and Sam Rockwell would be joining the Iron Man 2 cast as [...]

By: Mickey Rourke NOT The Crimson Dynamo In Iron Man 2 - Screen Rant

Mickey Rourke NOT The Crimson Dynamo In Iron Man 2 - Screen Rant — Wed, 04 Feb 2009 03:56:01 +0000

[...] a month ago, the exciting news broke that Mickey Rourke and Sam Rockwell would be joining the Iron Man 2 cast as [...]

By: Marvel Studios: Screwing Up Or Being Sensible? - Screen Rant

Marvel Studios: Screwing Up Or Being Sensible? - Screen Rant — Wed, 21 Jan 2009 18:28:51 +0000

[...] Now comes word that Marvel has offered Mickey Rourke $250,000 to appear in the sequel. From the unofficial announcent, it seemed that Rourke would play a significant part in the film. [...]

By: New Official Trailer For ‘Killshot’ - Screen Rant

New Official Trailer For ‘Killshot’ - Screen Rant — Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:07:06 +0000

[...] hype for his amazing performance in The Wrestler and at the same time, is being handed roles as the villain in Iron Man 2 and as an arms dealer in Sylvester Stallone’s Expendables. Joseph Gordon-Levitt is also someone [...]

By: Heath

Heath — Sat, 10 Jan 2009 16:27:35 +0000

@Hube:

HUBE! Yes indeed, it was the Marrs twins. And I think you and I talked about this over the phone 6 years ago.

Email me sometime.

heath

By: Hube

Hube — Sat, 10 Jan 2009 16:23:16 +0000

when I was dreaming of Iron Man movies. I thought Jake and Maggie Gyllenhaal would be perfect.

Hmmm, Heath. Sounds like a certain Marrs twins!!

By: Ken J

Ken J — Fri, 09 Jan 2009 00:44:52 +0000

Don’t worry Metallicat, Fox isn’t producing IM2, so that shouldn’t happen, lol. Imagine if he was like “My suit is powered by a Hemi.”

By: Metallicat79

Metallicat79 — Thu, 08 Jan 2009 23:50:01 +0000

I am ok with any villian, as long as they keep it grounded and in the same context and reality of the first one, the last thing we need is ti see IM suddenly go all Fantastic Four like.

By: Adrian

Adrian — Thu, 08 Jan 2009 15:11:15 +0000

Great news! I’m most excited about Rockwell as Justin Hammer, not that Rouke isn’t an excellent addition.

IMHO, if Justin Hammer is developed second Ironman and not killed off in, THEN we could see a variety of different villians with a strong foundation for motive and direction in destroying Ironman. Justin Hammer(ruthless, cunning, multi-billioniare, businessman rival to Stark Industries)develops and/or hires a huge gallery of mercanries like the following: 2 different Spymasters, Whiplash, 4 different Blizzards, Force, Adueduct, Blacklash, Beetle, Bleu Streak, Boomerang, Discus, 2 different Eels, Porcupine, Man-Killer, Melter, Cyclone and several others!
Just check out Vic’s other site AdvancedIron.org, tons more villians there.

With S.H.E.I.L.D.(Blackwidow, Nick Fury, and maybe Hawkeye) and possibly Hammer Industries in the mixes, this IM movie could vastly expand the Marvel Universe for the Avenger film.

By: Daniel F

Daniel F — Thu, 08 Jan 2009 12:31:58 +0000

I actually prefer the two villian set up. If done right it works out great. For instance Batman begins did it perfectly and everyone had a good presence on screen. The Dark Knight would of done it great had the very end been diff and two face lived.

By: Ken J

Ken J — Thu, 08 Jan 2009 10:34:19 +0000

Hm… could be pretty good…

By: Vic Holtreman

Vic Holtreman — Thu, 08 Jan 2009 05:35:04 +0000

One of the two source sites (Variety and Hollywood Reporter) have their details wrong. If it’s a Russian character named Ivan who is Tony Stark’s (I’m sure they meant “Iron Man’s”) counterpart – that’s Crimson Dynamo.

I’m not saying Whiplash WON’T be in the film, I just think people are combining the two into one and that’s just wrong.

Vic

By: Gary

Gary — Thu, 08 Jan 2009 03:26:59 +0000

money b,
Who is Tiberius Stone?
did you mean Obadiah Stane?

By: Gary

Gary — Thu, 08 Jan 2009 03:23:28 +0000

Didnt Favreau say awhile back that they had a found a way to include a number of armored advesaries in the sequel?
I only ask because Hammer sure employs a LOT of them !
Hmmmm
perhaps we should look out for the casting of Blizzard!

By: Gary

Gary — Thu, 08 Jan 2009 03:13:38 +0000

Another possibilty is BOTH Crimson Dynamo
and Whiplash are in the film .
Whiplash as a henchman to Hammer,
Maybe Hammer Finds a way to pit Russia against Stark.
Hence Crimson Dynamos involvement .
just speculating on a possible reason for the confusion.

By: Panda

Panda — Thu, 08 Jan 2009 02:59:44 +0000

“I’d rather see Whiplash than the Crimson Dynamo, as it’d be less of redux of the Iron Monger from the previous flick.”

I was thinking the same thing – that this sounds like a rehash. I have faith in Favs tho

By: money b

money b — Thu, 08 Jan 2009 02:51:45 +0000

“I’d rather see Whiplash than the Crimson Dynamo, as it’d be less of redux of the Iron Monger from the previous flick.” Totally agree. As a long time fan, I would still dig it but you gotta keep it fresh. Which is why I also like Justin Hammer entering the picture. One of my favorite villains from the comic. Unlike Tiberius Stone.

By: Gary

Gary — Thu, 08 Jan 2009 02:38:22 +0000

I hope its Whiplash for Roarke.
Rockwell might make an interesting Hammer.
He was great In Frost/Nixon.

By: ppnkof

ppnkof — Thu, 08 Jan 2009 02:32:04 +0000

And hear I was looking forward to the racially questionable stereotype of Mandarin appearing on the big screen in all his Fumanchu glory. Bummer.