<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MGM On The Edge of Bankruptcy [Updated]</title>
	<atom:link href="http://screenrant.com/mgm-bankruptcy-the-hobbit-james-bond-ross-27635/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://screenrant.com/mgm-bankruptcy-the-hobbit-james-bond-ross-27635/</link>
	<description>TV and Movie News, Reviews &#38; Trailers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 03:06:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Abe</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/mgm-bankruptcy-the-hobbit-james-bond-ross-27635/comment-page-1/#comment-399854</link>
		<dc:creator>Abe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 15:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=27635#comment-399854</guid>
		<description>It already has with the cancellation of SGU and the rest of the planned movies. I&#039;ve thought for some time now that SGU was killed by Syfy at the request of MGM because Syfy handled the show so bizarrely that it was out of the norm even for them. Don&#039;t get me wrong, I think Syfy is run by a bunch or crackpots and they are still culpable in killing SGU, but MGM needed money and the easiest way to save some dough would be to kill a long running series. With SGU employing relatively well known actors with larger salaries and the best FX the series had ever seen, and MGM&#039;s ongoing financial troubles it&#039;s pretty clear they had a major hand in SGU&#039;s demise - especially given the fact that the second season was so good. 

MGM needs to sell all of it&#039;s properties because they clearly can&#039;t manage them, and after The Hobbit and Bond 23 are out they need to sell the MGM name to the highest bidder. MGM is, well now it&#039;s more like was, a Hollywood institution. However, it has become increasingly clear they are never going to get their act together and/or get rid of the criminals running it. The absolute only reason they are even being granted these &#039;stays&#039; and extensions is the additional backing from outside studios and the creditors knowing the next two properties will make them bundles of money. Both properties can be made at a more financially stable studio, with less time to see a return, and better budgets. The remaining Middle Earth stories that can be made into films and Bond movies do not need MGM to get made and they won&#039;t. 

I fully expect Stargate to come back in some form on film, whether that&#039;s more SGU, a sequel to the original, or a total reboot. I don&#039;t expect MGM to own the property or be involved in any way when that happens and it will probably be Sony, Lionsgate, or some other studio with a vested interest in the Stargate IP now that will end up with full or co-ownership rights to the franchise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It already has with the cancellation of SGU and the rest of the planned movies. I&#8217;ve thought for some time now that SGU was killed by Syfy at the request of MGM because Syfy handled the show so bizarrely that it was out of the norm even for them. Don&#8217;t get me wrong, I think Syfy is run by a bunch or crackpots and they are still culpable in killing SGU, but MGM needed money and the easiest way to save some dough would be to kill a long running series. With SGU employing relatively well known actors with larger salaries and the best FX the series had ever seen, and MGM&#8217;s ongoing financial troubles it&#8217;s pretty clear they had a major hand in SGU&#8217;s demise &#8211; especially given the fact that the second season was so good. </p>
<p>MGM needs to sell all of it&#8217;s properties because they clearly can&#8217;t manage them, and after The Hobbit and Bond 23 are out they need to sell the MGM name to the highest bidder. MGM is, well now it&#8217;s more like was, a Hollywood institution. However, it has become increasingly clear they are never going to get their act together and/or get rid of the criminals running it. The absolute only reason they are even being granted these &#8216;stays&#8217; and extensions is the additional backing from outside studios and the creditors knowing the next two properties will make them bundles of money. Both properties can be made at a more financially stable studio, with less time to see a return, and better budgets. The remaining Middle Earth stories that can be made into films and Bond movies do not need MGM to get made and they won&#8217;t. </p>
<p>I fully expect Stargate to come back in some form on film, whether that&#8217;s more SGU, a sequel to the original, or a total reboot. I don&#8217;t expect MGM to own the property or be involved in any way when that happens and it will probably be Sony, Lionsgate, or some other studio with a vested interest in the Stargate IP now that will end up with full or co-ownership rights to the franchise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Shiny Robot - Where is Joss Whedon&#8217;s Cabin In The Woods??</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/mgm-bankruptcy-the-hobbit-james-bond-ross-27635/comment-page-1/#comment-351803</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Shiny Robot - Where is Joss Whedon&#8217;s Cabin In The Woods??</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=27635#comment-351803</guid>
		<description>[...] up the money to buy the distribution rights. If you haven&#8217;t been following any of the news on  MGM&#8217;s financial problems  and the many subsequent big ticket franchises they have held up &#8211; &#8220;Cabin in the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] up the money to buy the distribution rights. If you haven&#8217;t been following any of the news on  MGM&#8217;s financial problems  and the many subsequent big ticket franchises they have held up &#8211; &#8220;Cabin in the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guess Who&#8217;s Back&#8230; &#8249; Affordable Gear for Guys &#124; Uppgrader</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/mgm-bankruptcy-the-hobbit-james-bond-ross-27635/comment-page-1/#comment-327010</link>
		<dc:creator>Guess Who&#8217;s Back&#8230; &#8249; Affordable Gear for Guys &#124; Uppgrader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 22:29:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=27635#comment-327010</guid>
		<description>[...] It&#8217;s about friggin&#8217; time. After years of delays thanks to MGM&#8217;s financial troubles, Bond #23 is back on schedule with a tentative release set for November 9, 2012. A title has not [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It&#8217;s about friggin&#8217; time. After years of delays thanks to MGM&#8217;s financial troubles, Bond #23 is back on schedule with a tentative release set for November 9, 2012. A title has not [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guess Who&#8217;s Back&#8230; &#8249; uppgrader.com</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/mgm-bankruptcy-the-hobbit-james-bond-ross-27635/comment-page-1/#comment-308867</link>
		<dc:creator>Guess Who&#8217;s Back&#8230; &#8249; uppgrader.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 19:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=27635#comment-308867</guid>
		<description>[...] It&#8217;s about friggin&#8217; time. After years of delays thanks to MGM&#8217;s financial troubles, Bond #23 is back on schedule with a tentative release set for November 9, 2012. A title has not [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It&#8217;s about friggin&#8217; time. After years of delays thanks to MGM&#8217;s financial troubles, Bond #23 is back on schedule with a tentative release set for November 9, 2012. A title has not [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: About NImoy and Bond &#124; THE CIRX &#124; Movie Reviews, News and Lists</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/mgm-bankruptcy-the-hobbit-james-bond-ross-27635/comment-page-1/#comment-189599</link>
		<dc:creator>About NImoy and Bond &#124; THE CIRX &#124; Movie Reviews, News and Lists</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 22:55:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=27635#comment-189599</guid>
		<description>[...] comes as a surprise that the new instalment of the Bond movie Franchise was cancelled because of MGM&#8217;s bankruptcy. Daniel Craig was still chosen to play the most charming man in the British intelligence; in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] comes as a surprise that the new instalment of the Bond movie Franchise was cancelled because of MGM&#8217;s bankruptcy. Daniel Craig was still chosen to play the most charming man in the British intelligence; in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drluisfernandezturbica</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/mgm-bankruptcy-the-hobbit-james-bond-ross-27635/comment-page-1/#comment-186617</link>
		<dc:creator>drluisfernandezturbica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 23:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=27635#comment-186617</guid>
		<description>THE JOINT VENTURE WITH WARNER TO CEATE MGM/WARNER IS THE BEST SOLUTION</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THE JOINT VENTURE WITH WARNER TO CEATE MGM/WARNER IS THE BEST SOLUTION</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: It&#8217;s for Real &#8211; Variety says MGM Officially For Sale &#171; MovieDriver &#8211; Hollywood Teamster</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/mgm-bankruptcy-the-hobbit-james-bond-ross-27635/comment-page-1/#comment-174120</link>
		<dc:creator>It&#8217;s for Real &#8211; Variety says MGM Officially For Sale &#171; MovieDriver &#8211; Hollywood Teamster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 01:22:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=27635#comment-174120</guid>
		<description>[...] in September we reported on the financial troubles of movie studio Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer (or MGM for short). The studio has racked up a debt of a whopping $3.5 billion (yowza!) and, at the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in September we reported on the financial troubles of movie studio Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer (or MGM for short). The studio has racked up a debt of a whopping $3.5 billion (yowza!) and, at the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Mendes To Direct James Bond 23 - Screen Rant</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/mgm-bankruptcy-the-hobbit-james-bond-ross-27635/comment-page-1/#comment-167501</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Mendes To Direct James Bond 23 - Screen Rant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 03:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=27635#comment-167501</guid>
		<description>[...] of the negative news of MGM financial issues and production delays for the 23rd installment of the James Bond film franchise in recent months, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of the negative news of MGM financial issues and production delays for the 23rd installment of the James Bond film franchise in recent months, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MGM Officially For Sale - Screen Rant</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/mgm-bankruptcy-the-hobbit-james-bond-ross-27635/comment-page-1/#comment-153956</link>
		<dc:creator>MGM Officially For Sale - Screen Rant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 19:24:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=27635#comment-153956</guid>
		<description>[...] in September we reported on the financial troubles of movie studio Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer (or MGM for short). The studio has racked up a debt of a whopping $3.5 billion (yowza!) and, at the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in September we reported on the financial troubles of movie studio Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer (or MGM for short). The studio has racked up a debt of a whopping $3.5 billion (yowza!) and, at the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Zee</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/mgm-bankruptcy-the-hobbit-james-bond-ross-27635/comment-page-1/#comment-140057</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Zee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 14:38:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=27635#comment-140057</guid>
		<description>Referring to the question about the distribution rights to The Hobbit, United Artists had tried developing it as a movie at some point and it didn&#039;t work out, but the way Hollywood works, this gave them 50% dibbs on the film&#039;s distribution with New Line.  UA was bought by MGM and New Line was folded into Warner Bros., so that&#039;s how MGM got involved.  Right now, Warner is guaranteeing the financing and at some point someone will pay MGM&#039;s half just to collect the profits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Referring to the question about the distribution rights to The Hobbit, United Artists had tried developing it as a movie at some point and it didn&#8217;t work out, but the way Hollywood works, this gave them 50% dibbs on the film&#8217;s distribution with New Line.  UA was bought by MGM and New Line was folded into Warner Bros., so that&#8217;s how MGM got involved.  Right now, Warner is guaranteeing the financing and at some point someone will pay MGM&#8217;s half just to collect the profits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bond Franchise Going From MGM To Fox? - Screen Rant</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/mgm-bankruptcy-the-hobbit-james-bond-ross-27635/comment-page-1/#comment-140033</link>
		<dc:creator>Bond Franchise Going From MGM To Fox? - Screen Rant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 13:37:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=27635#comment-140033</guid>
		<description>[...] news struck that MGM was in little bit of financial trouble recently ($3.5 BILLION, little), two big projects/franchises were brought into question: the Bond [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] news struck that MGM was in little bit of financial trouble recently ($3.5 BILLION, little), two big projects/franchises were brought into question: the Bond [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Siri Atiragram Lleof</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/mgm-bankruptcy-the-hobbit-james-bond-ross-27635/comment-page-1/#comment-135479</link>
		<dc:creator>Siri Atiragram Lleof</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 06:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=27635#comment-135479</guid>
		<description>Stargate Universe is not canceled! It will be on on schedule. That was just some disgruntled Atlantis fan. He&#039;s a nothing, ignore him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stargate Universe is not canceled! It will be on on schedule. That was just some disgruntled Atlantis fan. He&#8217;s a nothing, ignore him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IQ</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/mgm-bankruptcy-the-hobbit-james-bond-ross-27635/comment-page-1/#comment-135393</link>
		<dc:creator>IQ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 00:46:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=27635#comment-135393</guid>
		<description>This is sad, way sad. I hope things will get resolved because loosing MGM will be near horrific. They&#039;re living history! Why can&#039;t FOX do us all a favor and get canned?  
Is this true about Stargate because I was thinking about recording the new SG.U. If anyone could clear that up for me it’d be cool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is sad, way sad. I hope things will get resolved because loosing MGM will be near horrific. They&#8217;re living history! Why can&#8217;t FOX do us all a favor and get canned?<br />
Is this true about Stargate because I was thinking about recording the new SG.U. If anyone could clear that up for me it’d be cool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kantstandya</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/mgm-bankruptcy-the-hobbit-james-bond-ross-27635/comment-page-1/#comment-135366</link>
		<dc:creator>kantstandya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 23:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=27635#comment-135366</guid>
		<description>oh man if fox got either of those it would be the worst thing in history please god no.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh man if fox got either of those it would be the worst thing in history please god no.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the old man</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/mgm-bankruptcy-the-hobbit-james-bond-ross-27635/comment-page-1/#comment-135350</link>
		<dc:creator>the old man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 23:09:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=27635#comment-135350</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d prefer almost any option than see MGM go bankrupt. It would be like having a giant hole in every theater screen. :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d prefer almost any option than see MGM go bankrupt. It would be like having a giant hole in every theater screen. <img src='http://cdn.screenrant.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EJK</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/mgm-bankruptcy-the-hobbit-james-bond-ross-27635/comment-page-1/#comment-135331</link>
		<dc:creator>EJK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 22:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=27635#comment-135331</guid>
		<description>BOND WOULD DEFAULT TO COLUMBIA SINCE BOTH COLUMBIA AND MGM ARE OWNED BY SONY, THE HOBBIT I&#039;M A LITTLE CONFUSED ON, BECAUSE LORD OF THE RINGS WAS NEW LINE WHICH WAS TIME WARNER, I&#039;M WONDERING WHY WARNER BROS. DOES&#039;NT HAVE THE HOBBIT?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BOND WOULD DEFAULT TO COLUMBIA SINCE BOTH COLUMBIA AND MGM ARE OWNED BY SONY, THE HOBBIT I&#8217;M A LITTLE CONFUSED ON, BECAUSE LORD OF THE RINGS WAS NEW LINE WHICH WAS TIME WARNER, I&#8217;M WONDERING WHY WARNER BROS. DOES&#8217;NT HAVE THE HOBBIT?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JOEFlannigan</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/mgm-bankruptcy-the-hobbit-james-bond-ross-27635/comment-page-1/#comment-135318</link>
		<dc:creator>JOEFlannigan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 21:22:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=27635#comment-135318</guid>
		<description>Stargate has been cancelled. Read the blogs. Sorry to say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stargate has been cancelled. Read the blogs. Sorry to say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy S</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/mgm-bankruptcy-the-hobbit-james-bond-ross-27635/comment-page-1/#comment-135301</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 20:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=27635#comment-135301</guid>
		<description>Hopefully they get this all straightened out.  I shudder at the thought of Fox getting The Hobbit or the Bond franchise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hopefully they get this all straightened out.  I shudder at the thought of Fox getting The Hobbit or the Bond franchise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Siri Atiragram Lleof</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/mgm-bankruptcy-the-hobbit-james-bond-ross-27635/comment-page-1/#comment-135287</link>
		<dc:creator>Siri Atiragram Lleof</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 20:12:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=27635#comment-135287</guid>
		<description>Does/Will this affect the Stargate franchise in any way?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does/Will this affect the Stargate franchise in any way?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

