<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: McG Talks Terminator Salvation Ending &amp; Trilogy Potential</title>
	<atom:link href="http://screenrant.com/mcg-talks-terminator-5-story-arc-trilogy-rob-6797/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://screenrant.com/mcg-talks-terminator-5-story-arc-trilogy-rob-6797/</link>
	<description>TV and Movie News, Reviews &#38; Trailers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 01:58:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Rumor Patrol: McG Making More Terminator Films? &#171; MovieDriver &#8211; Hollywood Teamster</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/mcg-talks-terminator-5-story-arc-trilogy-rob-6797/comment-page-2/#comment-159271</link>
		<dc:creator>Rumor Patrol: McG Making More Terminator Films? &#171; MovieDriver &#8211; Hollywood Teamster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 01:35:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=6797#comment-159271</guid>
		<description>[...] So director McG recently did one of those BD Live screening sessions for the Terminator Salvation Blu-ray release (these BD Live screenings are really becoming all the rage). During the screening, discussion apparently turned toward future installments of the Terminator franchise and McG apparently claimed that he will in fact be back to direct the fifth and sixth installments in the series, as was originally planned back when Salvation was conceived as a new Terminator trilogy. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] So director McG recently did one of those BD Live screening sessions for the Terminator Salvation Blu-ray release (these BD Live screenings are really becoming all the rage). During the screening, discussion apparently turned toward future installments of the Terminator franchise and McG apparently claimed that he will in fact be back to direct the fifth and sixth installments in the series, as was originally planned back when Salvation was conceived as a new Terminator trilogy. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rumor Patrol: McG Making More Terminator Films? - Screen Rant</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/mcg-talks-terminator-5-story-arc-trilogy-rob-6797/comment-page-2/#comment-159141</link>
		<dc:creator>Rumor Patrol: McG Making More Terminator Films? - Screen Rant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 18:56:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=6797#comment-159141</guid>
		<description>[...] So director McG recently did one of those BD Live screening sessions for the Terminator Salvation Blu-ray release (these BD Live screenings are really becoming all the rage). During the screening, discussion apparently turned toward future installments of the Terminator franchise and McG apparently claimed that he will in fact be back to direct the fifth and sixth installments in the series, as was originally planned back when Salvation was conceived as a new Terminator trilogy. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] So director McG recently did one of those BD Live screening sessions for the Terminator Salvation Blu-ray release (these BD Live screenings are really becoming all the rage). During the screening, discussion apparently turned toward future installments of the Terminator franchise and McG apparently claimed that he will in fact be back to direct the fifth and sixth installments in the series, as was originally planned back when Salvation was conceived as a new Terminator trilogy. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/mcg-talks-terminator-5-story-arc-trilogy-rob-6797/comment-page-2/#comment-97146</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 00:31:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=6797#comment-97146</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s begin with a sweeping generalization which I will hopefully later explain,

&quot;HOLLYWOOD HAS LOST IT&#039;S BALLS.&quot;

The Terminator in 1984 was an excellent if low&#039;ish budget movie and a massive success, and why?, the special effects were very good for the time but not awesome, it was basically just a chase movie so why did it work?. &quot;The idea&quot; &quot;The idea&quot; &quot;The idea&quot; Jim Cameron had a great idea it&#039;s that simple.

Terminator 2 again a massive success why it was just another chase movie, massive budget and hugely improved special effects, but that wasn&#039;t the key to it&#039;s success. Again it was the &quot;idea&quot; Cameron again had a brilliant &quot;idea&quot;, turn the scenario on it&#039;s head a bit having the big Austrian protect the central protagonist and not trying to destroy him. A real stroke of genius that worked perfectly.

Terminator 3 really failed on exactly the same premise. No new idea, no spark, Typical hollywood money machine fodder. &quot;Let&#039;s take the best bits of the previous two and it&#039;ll work&quot;. Well as we all know it just didn&#039;t.

So where could the franchise go but into the post judgement day era, and it really should have worked in mixing the terminator franchise with a Mad Max world. I really enjoyed Salvation but not on any other level than a pretty good action movie, I had no intention of writing a blog about it were it not for the rumours I am already hearing on the web. I just didn&#039;t feel opinionated enough to add my 50 cents to the cloud of noise but now I have to.

So it seems evident already that Salvation will make a profit, will do well at the box office, well enough to justify a 5th chapter, but already and in no small part because the film has not terminated everything else at the box office there is shear panic about what chapter 5 should be.

When Mr charlies angels was recruited to deliver terminator 4, I was of the same mind as many that this guy isn&#039;t up to the job, but let&#039;s look at where McG has shown the mythology great respect.

T600 rubber skin check !
HK&#039;s check
Kyle learning how to tie off his shotgun to himself (really subtle nod to the original)
The Sarah tapes, photo and redheaded wife of connor, chech, check and check !
Action, chase sequences and lots of explosions check.
The Connor scar (ok a bit of a clumsy &quot;look, look we expain that too&quot; moment)

Ok he&#039;s made mistakes, the brilliant cgi Arnie just wasn&#039;t that brilliant, destroyed city vista&#039;s are great but not if they are flanked by obviously 50 yr old forests (paint them out in post, you lazy fool, if concrete doesn&#039;t survive a nuclear blast neither does timber). The marcus character was a bit of a weak idea, but overall it was far better than chapter 3 in the franchise but not a batman begin&#039;s reboot moment.

The news on Terminator 5 is truely terrifying. A time travelling john Conner, Hk&#039;s travelling through time, Robert Patrick as a scientist obviously designing the t-1000 (Alien 3 anyone?). If even one of these rumours hold&#039;s any water what it tells me is the money men are saying...

&quot;T4 isn&#039;t going to make us a boat load of cash PANNNICCCC, copy the old films, bring in the people from the old films, travel through time, do anything to make it rock&quot;

Any respect for the timeline of the original trilogy that was shown in T4 would be terminated, trampled over and crushed underfoot worse than any damage to the poxy little T.V series cash in &quot;Sarah Connor Chronicles&quot; ever did.

Show some balls McG stick to your gun&#039;s progress the franchise in the post judgement day era, do no capitulate to money driven fools who wish to patronise the audience with &quot;you just want a robot chasing someone in present day L.A really don&#039;t you, ok we&#039;ll go back to that formulae&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s begin with a sweeping generalization which I will hopefully later explain,</p>
<p>&#8220;HOLLYWOOD HAS LOST IT&#8217;S BALLS.&#8221;</p>
<p>The Terminator in 1984 was an excellent if low&#8217;ish budget movie and a massive success, and why?, the special effects were very good for the time but not awesome, it was basically just a chase movie so why did it work?. &#8220;The idea&#8221; &#8220;The idea&#8221; &#8220;The idea&#8221; Jim Cameron had a great idea it&#8217;s that simple.</p>
<p>Terminator 2 again a massive success why it was just another chase movie, massive budget and hugely improved special effects, but that wasn&#8217;t the key to it&#8217;s success. Again it was the &#8220;idea&#8221; Cameron again had a brilliant &#8220;idea&#8221;, turn the scenario on it&#8217;s head a bit having the big Austrian protect the central protagonist and not trying to destroy him. A real stroke of genius that worked perfectly.</p>
<p>Terminator 3 really failed on exactly the same premise. No new idea, no spark, Typical hollywood money machine fodder. &#8220;Let&#8217;s take the best bits of the previous two and it&#8217;ll work&#8221;. Well as we all know it just didn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>So where could the franchise go but into the post judgement day era, and it really should have worked in mixing the terminator franchise with a Mad Max world. I really enjoyed Salvation but not on any other level than a pretty good action movie, I had no intention of writing a blog about it were it not for the rumours I am already hearing on the web. I just didn&#8217;t feel opinionated enough to add my 50 cents to the cloud of noise but now I have to.</p>
<p>So it seems evident already that Salvation will make a profit, will do well at the box office, well enough to justify a 5th chapter, but already and in no small part because the film has not terminated everything else at the box office there is shear panic about what chapter 5 should be.</p>
<p>When Mr charlies angels was recruited to deliver terminator 4, I was of the same mind as many that this guy isn&#8217;t up to the job, but let&#8217;s look at where McG has shown the mythology great respect.</p>
<p>T600 rubber skin check !<br />
HK&#8217;s check<br />
Kyle learning how to tie off his shotgun to himself (really subtle nod to the original)<br />
The Sarah tapes, photo and redheaded wife of connor, chech, check and check !<br />
Action, chase sequences and lots of explosions check.<br />
The Connor scar (ok a bit of a clumsy &#8220;look, look we expain that too&#8221; moment)</p>
<p>Ok he&#8217;s made mistakes, the brilliant cgi Arnie just wasn&#8217;t that brilliant, destroyed city vista&#8217;s are great but not if they are flanked by obviously 50 yr old forests (paint them out in post, you lazy fool, if concrete doesn&#8217;t survive a nuclear blast neither does timber). The marcus character was a bit of a weak idea, but overall it was far better than chapter 3 in the franchise but not a batman begin&#8217;s reboot moment.</p>
<p>The news on Terminator 5 is truely terrifying. A time travelling john Conner, Hk&#8217;s travelling through time, Robert Patrick as a scientist obviously designing the t-1000 (Alien 3 anyone?). If even one of these rumours hold&#8217;s any water what it tells me is the money men are saying&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;T4 isn&#8217;t going to make us a boat load of cash PANNNICCCC, copy the old films, bring in the people from the old films, travel through time, do anything to make it rock&#8221;</p>
<p>Any respect for the timeline of the original trilogy that was shown in T4 would be terminated, trampled over and crushed underfoot worse than any damage to the poxy little T.V series cash in &#8220;Sarah Connor Chronicles&#8221; ever did.</p>
<p>Show some balls McG stick to your gun&#8217;s progress the franchise in the post judgement day era, do no capitulate to money driven fools who wish to patronise the audience with &#8220;you just want a robot chasing someone in present day L.A really don&#8217;t you, ok we&#8217;ll go back to that formulae&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob H</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/mcg-talks-terminator-5-story-arc-trilogy-rob-6797/comment-page-2/#comment-94324</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 02:22:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=6797#comment-94324</guid>
		<description>I saw T4 today and I loved it. It&#039;s much better than Star Trek. I believe T4 is much better put together than T3.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw T4 today and I loved it. It&#8217;s much better than Star Trek. I believe T4 is much better put together than T3.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 790</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/mcg-talks-terminator-5-story-arc-trilogy-rob-6797/comment-page-2/#comment-82556</link>
		<dc:creator>790</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 00:58:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=6797#comment-82556</guid>
		<description>Oh you didn&#039;t like T3 kim Jong? Whata shocker ?  ;-P
 I felt it went down hill after I saw who they cast as Sarah Connor for the tv show. 
The pilot episode also contradicted the parameters of the time machine canon based on what Reese explained in Terminator...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh you didn&#8217;t like T3 kim Jong? Whata shocker ?  ;-P<br />
 I felt it went down hill after I saw who they cast as Sarah Connor for the tv show.<br />
The pilot episode also contradicted the parameters of the time machine canon based on what Reese explained in Terminator&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken J</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/mcg-talks-terminator-5-story-arc-trilogy-rob-6797/comment-page-2/#comment-82554</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 00:41:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=6797#comment-82554</guid>
		<description>Well, technically it was already ruined 6 years ago, but that&#039;s a different topic... lol

The only reason the last few episode of that show was good was because they were killing everyone off. The second season was very disappointing in my opinion. And now it looks like it&#039;s cancelled. Oh well, it could have been interesting to see a resistence under different leadership than John Connor. Watch it succeed faster than before, John would feel like crap, lol.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, technically it was already ruined 6 years ago, but that&#8217;s a different topic&#8230; lol</p>
<p>The only reason the last few episode of that show was good was because they were killing everyone off. The second season was very disappointing in my opinion. And now it looks like it&#8217;s cancelled. Oh well, it could have been interesting to see a resistence under different leadership than John Connor. Watch it succeed faster than before, John would feel like crap, lol.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 790</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/mcg-talks-terminator-5-story-arc-trilogy-rob-6797/comment-page-2/#comment-82548</link>
		<dc:creator>790</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 00:29:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=6797#comment-82548</guid>
		<description>The way things are going Tony you might get your wish. 

Although I think that would only completely ruin the integrity of the franchise but its almost ruined anyway...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The way things are going Tony you might get your wish. </p>
<p>Although I think that would only completely ruin the integrity of the franchise but its almost ruined anyway&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cat</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/mcg-talks-terminator-5-story-arc-trilogy-rob-6797/comment-page-2/#comment-82547</link>
		<dc:creator>Cat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 00:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=6797#comment-82547</guid>
		<description>She&#039;s not a great actress but I definitely liked her in the show. I just don&#039;t know if I would like her in the movie. That&#039;s a little risky.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She&#8217;s not a great actress but I definitely liked her in the show. I just don&#8217;t know if I would like her in the movie. That&#8217;s a little risky.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/mcg-talks-terminator-5-story-arc-trilogy-rob-6797/comment-page-2/#comment-82544</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 00:24:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=6797#comment-82544</guid>
		<description>Summer Glau has singlehandedly revived the Terminator franchise with her role as Cameron. It would be fitting if she played a big part of T5 and T6. You can easily incorporate her character in the movies especially with the changing timelines!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Summer Glau has singlehandedly revived the Terminator franchise with her role as Cameron. It would be fitting if she played a big part of T5 and T6. You can easily incorporate her character in the movies especially with the changing timelines!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 790</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/mcg-talks-terminator-5-story-arc-trilogy-rob-6797/comment-page-2/#comment-80623</link>
		<dc:creator>790</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 03:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=6797#comment-80623</guid>
		<description>Last I saw of Cameron she was showing a little too much Endo,,,    :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last I saw of Cameron she was showing a little too much Endo,,,    <img src='http://cdn.screenrant.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: connor</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/mcg-talks-terminator-5-story-arc-trilogy-rob-6797/comment-page-1/#comment-80618</link>
		<dc:creator>connor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 03:18:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=6797#comment-80618</guid>
		<description>Oh come guys help me out.
Lets try and get Summer Glau in terminator 5 and 6.
Cameron Phillips is the best terminator, and the best thing
to happen to John Connor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh come guys help me out.<br />
Lets try and get Summer Glau in terminator 5 and 6.<br />
Cameron Phillips is the best terminator, and the best thing<br />
to happen to John Connor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 790</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/mcg-talks-terminator-5-story-arc-trilogy-rob-6797/comment-page-1/#comment-80602</link>
		<dc:creator>790</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 01:33:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=6797#comment-80602</guid>
		<description>Zubin, the reason the TX came to be was the fact that the events in T2 didn&#039;t stop Skynet it only stalled it long enough for the technology to go full military.  Note that this would explain the on board weapons the TX, carried. 

The Flying HK was also refined as the ones we saw the future war scenes in T3 were a tad more heavily armed...

From the description Terminator gave John Conner (T2) the military started off by using Cyberdyne microchips in the stealth fighters. I believe that Skynet&#039;s evolution was altered by the time T3 occurred. Therefore this allows for new designs in cyborg hardware...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zubin, the reason the TX came to be was the fact that the events in T2 didn&#8217;t stop Skynet it only stalled it long enough for the technology to go full military.  Note that this would explain the on board weapons the TX, carried. </p>
<p>The Flying HK was also refined as the ones we saw the future war scenes in T3 were a tad more heavily armed&#8230;</p>
<p>From the description Terminator gave John Conner (T2) the military started off by using Cyberdyne microchips in the stealth fighters. I believe that Skynet&#8217;s evolution was altered by the time T3 occurred. Therefore this allows for new designs in cyborg hardware&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zubin</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/mcg-talks-terminator-5-story-arc-trilogy-rob-6797/comment-page-1/#comment-80482</link>
		<dc:creator>Zubin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 17:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=6797#comment-80482</guid>
		<description>As Gary said, i wouldn&#039;t mix TV &amp; Film universes. I wouldn&#039;t introduce any new robot models until every background of the existing ones are fully explored. Also logically &amp; realistically there should be some sort of progression or explaination of why newer models should be introduced. In T3, it was horrible because we suddendly get a smaller female terminator, cheesly dubbed T-X, who has an arm cannon and orgasms to blood. And we all want to ignore those events. Summer Glau makes a great terminator in the series, but no her character should not appear in the films or until we fully establish the innerworkings of Skynet.

As for a Robert Patrick based film, i&#039;m all for it as long as its kept logically sound.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Gary said, i wouldn&#8217;t mix TV &amp; Film universes. I wouldn&#8217;t introduce any new robot models until every background of the existing ones are fully explored. Also logically &amp; realistically there should be some sort of progression or explaination of why newer models should be introduced. In T3, it was horrible because we suddendly get a smaller female terminator, cheesly dubbed T-X, who has an arm cannon and orgasms to blood. And we all want to ignore those events. Summer Glau makes a great terminator in the series, but no her character should not appear in the films or until we fully establish the innerworkings of Skynet.</p>
<p>As for a Robert Patrick based film, i&#8217;m all for it as long as its kept logically sound.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 790</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/mcg-talks-terminator-5-story-arc-trilogy-rob-6797/comment-page-1/#comment-80356</link>
		<dc:creator>790</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 04:23:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=6797#comment-80356</guid>
		<description>First off, LMAO, at your gravatar Kahless,,,,  I&#039;m still laughing... Man that&#039;s funny in a good way,,,  :-) 

Second the T-1000 was a prototype and only one was created.  It was never fully tested it was just sent back asap... (Source: T2, novel based on the screenplay by Cameron/ Wisher.)

Later (Dark Horse Comics) expanded on the T-1000 origin.  His likeness was based on a resistance soldier that was teamed up with Reese.  He was captured and drugged for information by Skynet, then killed by two T-1000&#039;s who both took his likeness.  One went back to the past to kill John/T2, the other infiltrated the resistance after the fall of Skynet and was able to sneek past the celebrating humans, long enough to gain access to the crippled Skynet infrastructure and download a backup program. The series ended as the last T-1000 walked into the night, supposedly to restart Skynet at one of its other Command centers.  
^
If anyones into Terminator I highly reccomend that comic series. I forget the title but it came out several years after T2.  Just google, (Dark Horse Terminator comics). 

And yes I totally agree Cat, that would have killed the franchise harder then Indy 4 killed Jones...    :-)
I remember when that rumor came out, Mcg totally denied it was true,,, another true lie,,,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First off, LMAO, at your gravatar Kahless,,,,  I&#8217;m still laughing&#8230; Man that&#8217;s funny in a good way,,,  <img src='http://cdn.screenrant.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>Second the T-1000 was a prototype and only one was created.  It was never fully tested it was just sent back asap&#8230; (Source: T2, novel based on the screenplay by Cameron/ Wisher.)</p>
<p>Later (Dark Horse Comics) expanded on the T-1000 origin.  His likeness was based on a resistance soldier that was teamed up with Reese.  He was captured and drugged for information by Skynet, then killed by two T-1000&#8242;s who both took his likeness.  One went back to the past to kill John/T2, the other infiltrated the resistance after the fall of Skynet and was able to sneek past the celebrating humans, long enough to gain access to the crippled Skynet infrastructure and download a backup program. The series ended as the last T-1000 walked into the night, supposedly to restart Skynet at one of its other Command centers.<br />
^<br />
If anyones into Terminator I highly reccomend that comic series. I forget the title but it came out several years after T2.  Just google, (Dark Horse Terminator comics). </p>
<p>And yes I totally agree Cat, that would have killed the franchise harder then Indy 4 killed Jones&#8230;    <img src='http://cdn.screenrant.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
I remember when that rumor came out, Mcg totally denied it was true,,, another true lie,,,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cat</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/mcg-talks-terminator-5-story-arc-trilogy-rob-6797/comment-page-1/#comment-80316</link>
		<dc:creator>Cat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 01:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=6797#comment-80316</guid>
		<description>So, the ending that was leaked was going to be the actual ending????????? Thank God it leaked! That would have been the worst possible ending. Trying to get a little too creative I think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, the ending that was leaked was going to be the actual ending????????? Thank God it leaked! That would have been the worst possible ending. Trying to get a little too creative I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel F</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/mcg-talks-terminator-5-story-arc-trilogy-rob-6797/comment-page-1/#comment-80278</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel F</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 21:56:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=6797#comment-80278</guid>
		<description>A while back I&#039;d be all for a Series / Movie tie in, but where the series has gone now I can&#039;t agree with that. The series at this point has sort of gone to crap and not only that, but has completely changed and moved away from being related to any of the movies. The show seems more like a different universe now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A while back I&#8217;d be all for a Series / Movie tie in, but where the series has gone now I can&#8217;t agree with that. The series at this point has sort of gone to crap and not only that, but has completely changed and moved away from being related to any of the movies. The show seems more like a different universe now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: caro</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/mcg-talks-terminator-5-story-arc-trilogy-rob-6797/comment-page-1/#comment-80269</link>
		<dc:creator>caro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 21:16:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=6797#comment-80269</guid>
		<description>what talkative, this McG! i would know all the movie before see him!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what talkative, this McG! i would know all the movie before see him!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/mcg-talks-terminator-5-story-arc-trilogy-rob-6797/comment-page-1/#comment-80262</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 20:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=6797#comment-80262</guid>
		<description>I feel it is best not to even consider the first collection of films a trilogy. Better think of the two films independently and imagine that the third one never happened. Here&#039;s hoping others are down for collective amnesia. 

It&#039;s what I do when ever I think of the X-men: The Last Stand. Just consider it an unfinished trilogy. Never happened. lalalalalalala).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel it is best not to even consider the first collection of films a trilogy. Better think of the two films independently and imagine that the third one never happened. Here&#8217;s hoping others are down for collective amnesia. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s what I do when ever I think of the X-men: The Last Stand. Just consider it an unfinished trilogy. Never happened. lalalalalalala).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Keyes</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/mcg-talks-terminator-5-story-arc-trilogy-rob-6797/comment-page-1/#comment-80236</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Keyes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 18:54:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=6797#comment-80236</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m on the B.A.G. bandwagon at the moment so I&#039;ll say yes to that, SK-47.

A year ago, there were rumours that the movie may include a character or two from the TV series to tie it all together but it was all later debunked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m on the B.A.G. bandwagon at the moment so I&#8217;ll say yes to that, SK-47.</p>
<p>A year ago, there were rumours that the movie may include a character or two from the TV series to tie it all together but it was all later debunked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SK-47</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/mcg-talks-terminator-5-story-arc-trilogy-rob-6797/comment-page-1/#comment-80230</link>
		<dc:creator>SK-47</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 18:38:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=6797#comment-80230</guid>
		<description>no on Summer Glau. I really do not get the factuation with Summer, yes she is pretty, i mean, I sure wouldn&#039;t pass up a 1-nite-stand with her. And, she can kick really high. But I really don&#039;t see it/get it. 

If anything, they need to put in Brian Austin Green in this new trilogy of films.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no on Summer Glau. I really do not get the factuation with Summer, yes she is pretty, i mean, I sure wouldn&#8217;t pass up a 1-nite-stand with her. And, she can kick really high. But I really don&#8217;t see it/get it. </p>
<p>If anything, they need to put in Brian Austin Green in this new trilogy of films.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

