sponsored links
Ads by Google
  • DaddyRabbit
    The next Marvel Movie? The Thing vs The Hulk !!! It was a block-buster comic, it will be a block-buster movie.
    'nuff said.
  • with the surprize for 2012 could also be a silver surfer movie or fan 4 movie as while..either way i'm looking forward to all the string of movies coming up it seems like superheroes are taking over the big screen and all i got to say about that is its about time we see some good comic book hero films its been to long without them
  • i will see iron man 2 and thor and the avengres i will see the first avengre; captain america with captain america played by john cena im telling you john cena is cool when he plays captain america will see john cena on the first avengre; captain america and the avengres this is so exciting i will see this movies in theatres soon see ya.
  • leroy
    Marvel has so many heroes and villians to choose from they could keep making movies forever. One complaint I would have is the movies spend to much time on character developement. the movies would be much better if they got to the villians and the action a little quicker. For example the Hulk movie. I mean they have been developing the characters for 30 years and we all know them already if your a parent and you just want to get to the action if your a kid. I would love to see the Inhumans included in a future F F movie and Ultron in the Avengers.
  • leroy
    I would love to see The DEFENDERS movie. The original Lineup of the Silver Surfer, Doctor Strange, and the Hulk. Butthey would also need to include. the Valkary(a warior women from Asgard) Who was the fourth original member and a good friend of the Hulk. They could even throw in Hellcat and Nighthawk. A great enemy would be the Badoon( future rulers of Earth). Another great group was the Guardians of the Galaxy. I just hope Silver Surfer is back in a movie soon.
  • The Pitt Man
    The biggies have been made and some re-made (and or in production): X-men, spider man, avengers, Fantastic four, punisher, daredevil, and all the others I'm forgetting BUT there are a few nuggets that are not as popular in Comic Book form but could be awesome on screen, like... The Black Panther, an african king of Wakanda, with panther powers of a god? The script writes itself!
  • Allen
    I am such a huge fan of marvel characters in general and have been blown away from the movies that have been done in the last few years. Keep em coming i say!!!!
  • 37 radius
    Captain America i meant
  • 37 radius
    I don`t know much about Thor, Avengers, or Captain America, but I think it would be cool to se some new Marvel superheroes and what they`re like on screen. I`m not a fan of Hulk, Iron Man, Fantastic 4, or Ghost Rider, or X-Men, but i`d like to try a shot at leaking to these new upcoming superhero films. I prefer superheroes that aren`t too powerful and indestructible, like Spiderman and Batman. Maybe Captain should be pretty cool, analyzing that from view he`s probably not too lower-aged. I like superheroes that can be ALL AGES. Just please don`t make Spider-man have a crossover into any of those films.
  • Luke
    Or because even if they do it well, it will drive away audiences and work against the film from earning back it's budget. Brannagh, is an amazing director indeed, but his films don't typically earn mountains of cash.
  • Jessie
    Let's not forget that Kenneth Branaugh is a master when it comes to Shakespeare. He as performed it countless times on stage and has directed it before. He can make the unfamiliar language come across through actions and setting.

    I think it is a cop-out. It's not that the audience won't "get it" it's because the actors don't have the chops to pull it off convincingly.
  • Luke
    A couple of sites have picked up the story that a 2011 release date was revealed for the Fantastic Four reboot at the International Licensing Expo. Jim Hill Media seems to have been the one that initially broke the story and they're usually pretty reliable. Maybe this is the mystery project and one of the parties was just off by a year?

    And before people start asking "What, they're already rebooting Fantastic Four? What's next Transformers?" Let me remind you, that the studio has to come out with a new film within the next few years or else the rights revert back to Marvel, so a 2011 or 2012 release date would be pretty realistic.
  • Morituri
    I am Italian and they never used Shakespear's tone in the comics over here so I assume that was just in English but movies is something else. What do you want a work of art or a comic ? The only logical choice for a blockbuster is to use a universal language as possible. Not sure about the leads but the proof is in the pudding I guess. Definately not sure about Kenneth Branagh directing either, Frankenstein still lingers in the mind...
  • Claude
    Not quite sure I read that: did you say no Donald Blake? Sigh, there goes the human angle.
  • michael
    please just concentrate on marvels heavy hitters and leave the less interesting ones alone. audiences want to see exciting and interestig characters like thor captain america and ironman but everyone is getting bored seeing the same superhero movies being made. i have had enough of x-men and hulk. also the avengers movie should have been made before any x-men or fantastic four movies. marvel please stop overlooking & disrespecting your most important & interesting superhero's. forget about boring daredevil & no more spiderman.
  • juan codemo
    i like thw fact that all this movies r coiming out
  • Adrian
    @Andy S: I'm with you, Nick Fury/S.h.i.e.l.d. film sounds about right, but I'm thinking Antman is the 2012 film because it still does not have a release date and the Avengers will be releasing the same year. IMHO,a few wild cards could also be Hawkeye, Black Widow, or Black Panther.
  • Andy S
    I have to agree with Adrian. The Shakespearean language would put half the audience asleep, much less leave most of the audience wondering what the heck he was saying. I think nixing that in the bud was a great business move.

    I also think that a Nick Fury: Agent of Shield movie is a distinct possibility. Samuel L. Jackson IS signed for something like 9 films. SO we have IM2, Cap, Thor, Avengers...that leaves quite a bit open even if there are sequels for Hulk and Cap.
  • Adrian
    Sorry guys , but Thor's film not being Shakespearean was a very wise business move. Don't get me wrong, a Shakespearean Thor film would be enlightening for use fanboys and 30+ somethings, but would BORE all just about anyone less out of the theatre. If Marvel want's Ironman/LOFTR blockbuster molla then the have to leave most of the Shakespear out this round.
  • Phil G
    You can't kill a god anyway. Can you? ;D
  • Josh R
    Loki being signed on for another film is good, since it means they won't kill the villain off at the end of the film, like 90% of comic book movies.
  • John "Kahless" Taylor
    Methinks thou protests too little. Thine lord Marvel deliverth grand mine origin but forsaketh yon speech of the gods. I calleth upon Mjonir and thy might! Smite yon lord Marvel into utter submission!
  • Iron Patriot
    @greenknight333
    Thanks. I kinda figured it wouldn't be possible. Can't wait until Marvel Studios gets it's properties back, especially X-Men & Spider-Man. Unfortunately the only way I see that happening is after comic book movies stop being profitable, so... *sips drink*
  • Zipper Stevens
    I've also read that the writers of Thor are particularly following Walt Simonson's run. ...deep breath... that DEFINITELY increases my interest in the Thor movie. I doubt we will ever see Beta Ray Bill... maybe in a sequel.

    Also, MARVEL: please reconsider using the Shakespearean dialogue. To not use it, dumbs it down in my opinion.
  • Gary
    Thor could still use a form of classical speech that isnt Shakespearean.
    Didnt the comic written by JMS dump Shakesapearean speech too ?
  • Darren seeley
    or Doctor...DRUID, for that matter.
    I know. Not likely.
  • Darren seeley
    Not much is said about the X-Men films...and what's on tap at Fox overall (Fantastic Four/Silver Surfer, Daredevil)...but since it has, thus far, been three years between X-Men films...

    But i'll count those out for the moment as well as 'Venom' and 'Ghost Rider 2'. The way it's mentioned, it's character(s) which rights belong 100% to Marvel feature film wise.

    I'll discount 'Ant-Man', because they'd come right out and say Ant-Man .However, there may be some hope the film gets underway around the time of 'The Avengers', which would still tie in nicely.

    So I'll go here: Nick Fury Agent Of Shield.

    [If it were up to me, though, it would be Namor or Killraven]
  • greenknight333
    @ Iron Patriot

    FOX studios has the rights to ALL mutants as far as I know so that rules out the Scarlett WItch and Qichsilver..I'd like to see the Vision and Wonderman(although he is Hulk lite I guess).



    Here is a great article by Carl Lee from Screen Rant from a few months back

    http://screenrant.com/marvel-comics-movies-char...

    Cheers
    GK333
  • Foopher
    Phil G, you make me laugh, haha, in a good way
  • freemoon
    I believe Fox has rights of the those who appeared as part of the X-Men. So Scarlet Witch and Quicksilver were part of the avenges. Marvel is on the right way since Marvel Studios. I hope they can keep it like that.
blog comments powered by Disqus