<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Answered: Which Studios Own Which Marvel Characters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://screenrant.com/marvel-comics-movies-characters-carl-6766/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://screenrant.com/marvel-comics-movies-characters-carl-6766/</link>
	<description>TV and Movie News, Reviews &#38; Trailers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 08:38:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/>	<item>
		<title>By: AvengersAssemble</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/marvel-comics-movies-characters-carl-6766/comment-page-4/#comment-521727</link>
		<dc:creator>AvengersAssemble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 03:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=6766#comment-521727</guid>
		<description>Face it, Fox will NEVER willingly just give up Marvel characters back to Marvel. Fox company is responsible for Avatar. The #1 grossing movie (until Avengers kicks in) So they&#039;re plenty rich. Even though BV (Thing that made Avengers) is 5 out of the top 11 (Avengers is 11th according to my chart) Fox is only 2 out of the 11, but it&#039;s #1 and they&#039;re so much bigger than Marvel. They can make plenty of money without the characters, but they don&#039;t want Marvel surpassing them so they just keep them. Some X-Mens are the only ACCEPTABLE movies to me...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Face it, Fox will NEVER willingly just give up Marvel characters back to Marvel. Fox company is responsible for Avatar. The #1 grossing movie (until Avengers kicks in) So they&#8217;re plenty rich. Even though BV (Thing that made Avengers) is 5 out of the top 11 (Avengers is 11th according to my chart) Fox is only 2 out of the 11, but it&#8217;s #1 and they&#8217;re so much bigger than Marvel. They can make plenty of money without the characters, but they don&#8217;t want Marvel surpassing them so they just keep them. Some X-Mens are the only ACCEPTABLE movies to me&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: darthstcih</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/marvel-comics-movies-characters-carl-6766/comment-page-4/#comment-520544</link>
		<dc:creator>darthstcih</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 00:05:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=6766#comment-520544</guid>
		<description>Kick-Ass and Men in Black are also both technically Marvel properties. I know Kick-Ass isn&#039;t actually owned by Marvel but by it&#039;s creator, but is it theoretically possible that Men in Black falls under the similar contracts as these other Marvel properties, and therefore if Sony gave up the rights to Marvel characters, ownership would revert back to Marvel/Disney?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kick-Ass and Men in Black are also both technically Marvel properties. I know Kick-Ass isn&#8217;t actually owned by Marvel but by it&#8217;s creator, but is it theoretically possible that Men in Black falls under the similar contracts as these other Marvel properties, and therefore if Sony gave up the rights to Marvel characters, ownership would revert back to Marvel/Disney?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: darthstich</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/marvel-comics-movies-characters-carl-6766/comment-page-4/#comment-519179</link>
		<dc:creator>darthstich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 00:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=6766#comment-519179</guid>
		<description>From what I read, the Marvel contract for the characters applies indefinitely as long as they make a movie every X number of years (It varies studio to studios probably based on how much money they shelled out up front). A studio can willingly give the rights back, like Universal did with Hulk and Paramount did with the other members of the Avengers. Otherwise, as long as something is being worked on, or is recent, the companies can hold onto the characters. That&#039;s why Ghost Rider got a sequel and Fantastic Four, Daredevil, and Spider Man are being rebooted despite the last films of each not being good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From what I read, the Marvel contract for the characters applies indefinitely as long as they make a movie every X number of years (It varies studio to studios probably based on how much money they shelled out up front). A studio can willingly give the rights back, like Universal did with Hulk and Paramount did with the other members of the Avengers. Otherwise, as long as something is being worked on, or is recent, the companies can hold onto the characters. That&#8217;s why Ghost Rider got a sequel and Fantastic Four, Daredevil, and Spider Man are being rebooted despite the last films of each not being good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ultenth</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/marvel-comics-movies-characters-carl-6766/comment-page-4/#comment-516535</link>
		<dc:creator>Ultenth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 04:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=6766#comment-516535</guid>
		<description>Jackman himself has said he&#039;s too tall.  He&#039;s quoted as saying that basically he wishes he was shorter so he could capture more of the character&#039;s pathos regarding his stature esp. compared to Sabertooth his archnemesis who SHOULD tower over him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jackman himself has said he&#8217;s too tall.  He&#8217;s quoted as saying that basically he wishes he was shorter so he could capture more of the character&#8217;s pathos regarding his stature esp. compared to Sabertooth his archnemesis who SHOULD tower over him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Exovedate</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/marvel-comics-movies-characters-carl-6766/comment-page-4/#comment-516515</link>
		<dc:creator>Exovedate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 03:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=6766#comment-516515</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know how any of this stuff works, but isn&#039;t there an &#039;expiration date&#039; for most of these agreements, where Marvel can choose to not let Fox or Sony renew their contracts without them shelling out (most likely) a shit load of money?

Also if this is so, are these expiration&#039;s known at all via the public, or are they all completely private?

Thanks in advance for any answers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know how any of this stuff works, but isn&#8217;t there an &#8216;expiration date&#8217; for most of these agreements, where Marvel can choose to not let Fox or Sony renew their contracts without them shelling out (most likely) a s*** load of money?</p>
<p>Also if this is so, are these expiration&#8217;s known at all via the public, or are they all completely private?</p>
<p>Thanks in advance for any answers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marvel Montano</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/marvel-comics-movies-characters-carl-6766/comment-page-4/#comment-515361</link>
		<dc:creator>Marvel Montano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 23:16:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=6766#comment-515361</guid>
		<description>im starting to think this guy doesn&#039;t k ow what he&#039;s talking about, marvel studios has the rights to blade and punisher acquired last year and after seeing the avengers its not hard to speculate who has the rights to silver surfer. Not to mention the rumors of daredevil reverting back soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>im starting to think this guy doesn&#8217;t k ow what he&#8217;s talking about, marvel studios has the rights to blade and punisher acquired last year and after seeing the avengers its not hard to speculate who has the rights to silver surfer. Not to mention the rumors of daredevil reverting back soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xmasevebaby</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/marvel-comics-movies-characters-carl-6766/comment-page-4/#comment-515353</link>
		<dc:creator>Xmasevebaby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 22:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=6766#comment-515353</guid>
		<description>Never been a fan of Nova in comic book form, but I would love to see Marvel&#039;s version of Green Lantern on the big screen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never been a fan of Nova in comic book form, but I would love to see Marvel&#8217;s version of Green Lantern on the big screen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: เบื้องหลังลิขสิทธิ์ฮีโร่ค่าย Marvel: สไปเดอร์แมน และวูลฟ์เวอรีนจะมีวันโผล่ในหนัง The Avengers หรือไม่</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/marvel-comics-movies-characters-carl-6766/comment-page-4/#comment-513990</link>
		<dc:creator>เบื้องหลังลิขสิทธิ์ฮีโร่ค่าย Marvel: สไปเดอร์แมน และวูลฟ์เวอรีนจะมีวันโผล่ในหนัง The Avengers หรือไม่</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 20:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=6766#comment-513990</guid>
		<description>[...] ScreenRant, Comic Book Resources, Marvel, IMDB, NY Times, Variety  /*      /*  */            Share on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ScreenRant, Comic Book Resources, Marvel, IMDB, NY Times, Variety  /*      /*  */            Share on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Orpheus</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/marvel-comics-movies-characters-carl-6766/comment-page-4/#comment-511606</link>
		<dc:creator>Orpheus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2012 07:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=6766#comment-511606</guid>
		<description>Glad to hear Marvel has Blade and Punisher back. Not because the Snipes Blades were bad (they were actually quite well done) but because I&#039;m eager to see what Marvel can do with it. Blade&#039;s crossovers go better with mutants (if you saw the animated series in Japan, Wolverine and he made a great tag team), and spiderman also had a good pairing in the old toon on fox, so I don&#039;t know how much we&#039;ll be seeing of him with the Avengers squad in the future. Punisher needed to be with Marvel.

Here&#039;s hoping they get Daredevil back too, but because of Elektra they have to wait until 2015. But it looks like Fox already has plans for preproduction on a reboot so I guess it might not happen. Ghost Rider is such an awesome character and Sony has done such an awful job with him IMO I really hope they hang it up and let Marvel have him again. They can&#039;t be making any profit on these films. He cameo&#039;d well in the old Fantastic Four Series on fox but they don&#039;t seem to know how to market the team in films. 

While I don&#039;t mind seeing Sony reboot spiderman, Raimi&#039;s hatred for venom and obsession with Sandman ruined S3 when 2 was such a great film (1 is overrated IMO mainly by people who the whole spiderman thing was new to IMO same with X-men 1). I would like to see Spiderman and Kingpin in the same film though I wonder if Marvel can just give them those rights if they get Daredevil back.

I refuse to support an FF4 movie in theatres as bad as theyve been, until the rights go back to marvel. Surfer and Galactus in the marvel films would be cool, and then the thing vs hulk is one of his more interesting battles. but if they get johnny I&#039;d be looking to see him race Ice-man of x-men.
Finally speaking of X-men, First Class was great and Marvel has their hands full with the Avengers cast. Wouldnt mind seeing how First Class series plays out and if they can do a solo Wolverine film right. X2 was great but X3 was so bad, Im convinced Marvel is the only studio that could do the phoenix saga justice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad to hear Marvel has Blade and Punisher back. Not because the Snipes Blades were bad (they were actually quite well done) but because I&#8217;m eager to see what Marvel can do with it. Blade&#8217;s crossovers go better with mutants (if you saw the animated series in Japan, Wolverine and he made a great tag team), and spiderman also had a good pairing in the old toon on fox, so I don&#8217;t know how much we&#8217;ll be seeing of him with the Avengers squad in the future. Punisher needed to be with Marvel.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s hoping they get Daredevil back too, but because of Elektra they have to wait until 2015. But it looks like Fox already has plans for preproduction on a reboot so I guess it might not happen. Ghost Rider is such an awesome character and Sony has done such an awful job with him IMO I really hope they hang it up and let Marvel have him again. They can&#8217;t be making any profit on these films. He cameo&#8217;d well in the old Fantastic Four Series on fox but they don&#8217;t seem to know how to market the team in films. </p>
<p>While I don&#8217;t mind seeing Sony reboot spiderman, Raimi&#8217;s hatred for venom and obsession with Sandman ruined S3 when 2 was such a great film (1 is overrated IMO mainly by people who the whole spiderman thing was new to IMO same with X-men 1). I would like to see Spiderman and Kingpin in the same film though I wonder if Marvel can just give them those rights if they get Daredevil back.</p>
<p>I refuse to support an FF4 movie in theatres as bad as theyve been, until the rights go back to marvel. Surfer and Galactus in the marvel films would be cool, and then the thing vs hulk is one of his more interesting battles. but if they get johnny I&#8217;d be looking to see him race Ice-man of x-men.<br />
Finally speaking of X-men, First Class was great and Marvel has their hands full with the Avengers cast. Wouldnt mind seeing how First Class series plays out and if they can do a solo Wolverine film right. X2 was great but X3 was so bad, Im convinced Marvel is the only studio that could do the phoenix saga justice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/marvel-comics-movies-characters-carl-6766/comment-page-4/#comment-504363</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 20:43:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=6766#comment-504363</guid>
		<description>The big two film rights that Marvel still doesn&#039;t own, Spider-Man and X-Men, will be hard to get back simply because Sony and Fox keep making movies based on the characters. The only way to retain rights is to continue to produce films, am I not correct? Or is it possible that the rights have to be renewed regardless of how many films have been and will be produced? Because I really belive that Marvel wants both back and in time, they will but Sony and Fox have an iron grip on both franchises that it will be hard to buy them back. I know we can&#039;t have a true movie Marvel Universe yet but isn&#039;t it possible that studios can cooperate to make that happne? I don&#039;t see anything wrong with Sony, Fox, and Paramount coming together to unite all of these characters in films together. But I don&#039;t see it realistically happening because money is everything for these studios. Maybe one day Marvel can have all their characters under one roof but it&#039;s not going to be easy. However, the last thing I will state is that if Sony&#039;s Amazing Spider-Man is as good as last year&#039;s X-Men: First Class from Fox, we may be in for a treat and wash away the nasty taste of Spider-Man 3, X-Men: The Last Stand, and X-Men Origins: Wolverine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The big two film rights that Marvel still doesn&#8217;t own, Spider-Man and X-Men, will be hard to get back simply because Sony and Fox keep making movies based on the characters. The only way to retain rights is to continue to produce films, am I not correct? Or is it possible that the rights have to be renewed regardless of how many films have been and will be produced? Because I really belive that Marvel wants both back and in time, they will but Sony and Fox have an iron grip on both franchises that it will be hard to buy them back. I know we can&#8217;t have a true movie Marvel Universe yet but isn&#8217;t it possible that studios can cooperate to make that happne? I don&#8217;t see anything wrong with Sony, Fox, and Paramount coming together to unite all of these characters in films together. But I don&#8217;t see it realistically happening because money is everything for these studios. Maybe one day Marvel can have all their characters under one roof but it&#8217;s not going to be easy. However, the last thing I will state is that if Sony&#8217;s Amazing Spider-Man is as good as last year&#8217;s X-Men: First Class from Fox, we may be in for a treat and wash away the nasty taste of Spider-Man 3, X-Men: The Last Stand, and X-Men Origins: Wolverine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Electra</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/marvel-comics-movies-characters-carl-6766/comment-page-4/#comment-503362</link>
		<dc:creator>Electra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 05:56:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=6766#comment-503362</guid>
		<description>Truthfully, I really do believe that Marvel needs to retain the rights to ALL their characters especially now more then ever considering the release of The Avengers. Now people crying for Wolverine to have a cameo in the at least first 3 films(i say that in theoretical manner as well as hopefully that The Avengers actually live up to everyone&#039;s exceptions and continues on) is misplaced. The FOUNDING members of the Avengers should be featured first and foremost and trying to add on Wolverine, Spider-man or any other Later dated Avenger would be way too premature especially if the Production crews are trying to keep at least some comic book storied backgrounds in tact(obviously certain things are changed due to ideas and what can and cant be done on the big screen plus targeting a whole new fan base and reintroducing these characters to everyone). Though I would really like to see the fore mentioned(Wolvie/Spiderman/Ms. Marvel etc.) in an later time included in an Avenger production considering that they are all registered Avengers though this also includes the team leaders of the X men(Cyclops, Storm, Beast, even Professor X(though he&#039;s always been more of an adviser but never the less still an Avenger) as well as the entire team of the Fantastic Four(but please have different actors portraying them.) But to be honest the story i would REALLY love to see on the Big Screen is the Civil War series but that would be crap load of work to lead up too. As far as DC comics they have come out with some amazing characters but not as many as Marvel has and no one to date as done any of them justice(Save for Chris Nolan&#039;s Version of Batman(Thank god).) Maybe hopefully they can learn a little from Marvel&#039;s chance-taking and actually bring the proper people together to finally give Super-Man, Wonder Woman, Green Lantern, Vision etc the Justice they too deserve. So Marvel hurry up and get your characters back under your own wing so no one else to ruin them for the rest of us(again).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Truthfully, I really do believe that Marvel needs to retain the rights to ALL their characters especially now more then ever considering the release of The Avengers. Now people crying for Wolverine to have a cameo in the at least first 3 films(i say that in theoretical manner as well as hopefully that The Avengers actually live up to everyone&#8217;s exceptions and continues on) is misplaced. The FOUNDING members of the Avengers should be featured first and foremost and trying to add on Wolverine, Spider-man or any other Later dated Avenger would be way too premature especially if the Production crews are trying to keep at least some comic book storied backgrounds in tact(obviously certain things are changed due to ideas and what can and cant be done on the big screen plus targeting a whole new fan base and reintroducing these characters to everyone). Though I would really like to see the fore mentioned(Wolvie/Spiderman/Ms. Marvel etc.) in an later time included in an Avenger production considering that they are all registered Avengers though this also includes the team leaders of the X men(Cyclops, Storm, Beast, even Professor X(though he&#8217;s always been more of an adviser but never the less still an Avenger) as well as the entire team of the Fantastic Four(but please have different actors portraying them.) But to be honest the story i would REALLY love to see on the Big Screen is the Civil War series but that would be crap load of work to lead up too. As far as DC comics they have come out with some amazing characters but not as many as Marvel has and no one to date as done any of them justice(Save for Chris Nolan&#8217;s Version of Batman(Thank god).) Maybe hopefully they can learn a little from Marvel&#8217;s chance-taking and actually bring the proper people together to finally give Super-Man, Wonder Woman, Green Lantern, Vision etc the Justice they too deserve. So Marvel hurry up and get your characters back under your own wing so no one else to ruin them for the rest of us(again).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/marvel-comics-movies-characters-carl-6766/comment-page-4/#comment-497913</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 15:34:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=6766#comment-497913</guid>
		<description>I wish ALL the rights would go back to Marvel and then they had seperate collab films. Like Fantasic 4, Spiderman, and daredevil. Then Blade and either Ghost rider or Punisher. Daredevil and Punisher. Punisher and wolverine. Stuff like that then of course the bigger name in avengers but all tied in the same universe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish ALL the rights would go back to Marvel and then they had seperate collab films. Like Fantasic 4, Spiderman, and daredevil. Then Blade and either Ghost rider or Punisher. Daredevil and Punisher. Punisher and wolverine. Stuff like that then of course the bigger name in avengers but all tied in the same universe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blastaar</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/marvel-comics-movies-characters-carl-6766/comment-page-4/#comment-489033</link>
		<dc:creator>Blastaar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2012 07:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=6766#comment-489033</guid>
		<description>@tiberiusfunk@ I totally agree with you on the Marvel characters thing. Marvel characters have been the first ones to create anti-heroes in comicbooks with the likes of Namor but DC characters seem to be too cookie cutter. Wolverine for example is one of a kind, being that he is not tall and handsome as most DC heroes are or most heroes are for that matter. The fact that Wolverine is short, hairy, stocky and has a nasty attitude is what make him one of the more obscure and different characters that make him stand out. He&#039;s an underdog that has gone up against the Hulk. Another is that Marvel has more characters that are in the grey area where they aren&#039;t really heroes, villains or anti-heroes, I think that makes for a more interesting dynamic. Heroes that have criminal backgrounds, money issues, faced with racism, or sexism, day to day human problems. These are the things that make the Marvel Characters more interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@tiberiusfunk@ I totally agree with you on the Marvel characters thing. Marvel characters have been the first ones to create anti-heroes in comicbooks with the likes of Namor but DC characters seem to be too cookie cutter. Wolverine for example is one of a kind, being that he is not tall and handsome as most DC heroes are or most heroes are for that matter. The fact that Wolverine is short, hairy, stocky and has a nasty attitude is what make him one of the more obscure and different characters that make him stand out. He&#8217;s an underdog that has gone up against the Hulk. Another is that Marvel has more characters that are in the grey area where they aren&#8217;t really heroes, villains or anti-heroes, I think that makes for a more interesting dynamic. Heroes that have criminal backgrounds, money issues, faced with racism, or sexism, day to day human problems. These are the things that make the Marvel Characters more interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blastaar</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/marvel-comics-movies-characters-carl-6766/comment-page-4/#comment-489028</link>
		<dc:creator>Blastaar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2012 06:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=6766#comment-489028</guid>
		<description>@Murdock &amp; The avenger, No, Aronofsky didn&#039;t say that Jackman was not bulky enough. He said Jackman in reality was too tall for Wolverine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Murdock &amp; The avenger, No, Aronofsky didn&#8217;t say that Jackman was not bulky enough. He said Jackman in reality was too tall for Wolverine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tiberiusfunk</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/marvel-comics-movies-characters-carl-6766/comment-page-4/#comment-488350</link>
		<dc:creator>tiberiusfunk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 21:12:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=6766#comment-488350</guid>
		<description>Being an avid comic reader for many years now I am happy in the respect that technology has reached a point that many of the comic characters I love can now be fully realised on the big screen. However, just because a character is great in a comic, doesn&#039;t necessarily mean the character will be great in a movie. Comics and movies are very different mediums and therefore any comic character going to appear on the big screen might be subject to some minor changes (X-men costumes in comics as opposed to in the movies for example). I do think that whoever owns the rights to these characters should respect the original source material and not change things for the sake of it; there is a reason why many of these characters have been around for 30 or 40 year or more and remain popular. By respecting the original source material (and not changing things according to demographics or some studio executive&#039;s idea of what we, the viewing public want to see) the movie will have thousands, if not millions of ready made viewers who will help with spreading the word of how good the movie is.

And with respect to DC comics, apart from Batman, Superman and Wonder Woman, i don&#039;t think enough of their characters are well known enough outside of the geeky comic book world to be made into movies. I must confess, I have always been more of a Marvel fan, as I find their characters and stories more complex, easier to relate to and more realistic (Marvel characters often make mistakes or bad decisions. Their relationships with partners or each other isn&#039;t always perfect. Sometimes doing the right thing occasionally has unforeseen bad outcome. It is rare that such things happen in DC with their main characters, with the exception of Batman).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being an avid comic reader for many years now I am happy in the respect that technology has reached a point that many of the comic characters I love can now be fully realised on the big screen. However, just because a character is great in a comic, doesn&#8217;t necessarily mean the character will be great in a movie. Comics and movies are very different mediums and therefore any comic character going to appear on the big screen might be subject to some minor changes (X-men costumes in comics as opposed to in the movies for example). I do think that whoever owns the rights to these characters should respect the original source material and not change things for the sake of it; there is a reason why many of these characters have been around for 30 or 40 year or more and remain popular. By respecting the original source material (and not changing things according to demographics or some studio executive&#8217;s idea of what we, the viewing public want to see) the movie will have thousands, if not millions of ready made viewers who will help with spreading the word of how good the movie is.</p>
<p>And with respect to DC comics, apart from Batman, Superman and Wonder Woman, i don&#8217;t think enough of their characters are well known enough outside of the geeky comic book world to be made into movies. I must confess, I have always been more of a Marvel fan, as I find their characters and stories more complex, easier to relate to and more realistic (Marvel characters often make mistakes or bad decisions. Their relationships with partners or each other isn&#8217;t always perfect. Sometimes doing the right thing occasionally has unforeseen bad outcome. It is rare that such things happen in DC with their main characters, with the exception of Batman).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xmasevebaby</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/marvel-comics-movies-characters-carl-6766/comment-page-4/#comment-486111</link>
		<dc:creator>Xmasevebaby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 04:53:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=6766#comment-486111</guid>
		<description>Marvel, you guys need to totally reboot Moon Knight to get him ready for his inevitable close-up on the big screen.  Just try to put some distance between Dark Knight Rises (two years minimum), do an animated series or straight to DVD animated feature under the Marvel Knights banner, and do a proper origin story that would have the look and feel of an early Michael Mann or Jim Cameron movie.  In short, less Mark Steven Johnson and Stephen Sommers and more Matthew Vaughn or the guy who directed Chronicle.

Avoid as much CGI as possible and try your damnedest not to purposely rip-off Batman any more than you already have with the whole crazy rich white boy thing.

Otherwise, don&#039;t even waste your time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marvel, you guys need to totally reboot Moon Knight to get him ready for his inevitable close-up on the big screen.  Just try to put some distance between Dark Knight Rises (two years minimum), do an animated series or straight to DVD animated feature under the Marvel Knights banner, and do a proper origin story that would have the look and feel of an early Michael Mann or Jim Cameron movie.  In short, less Mark Steven Johnson and Stephen Sommers and more Matthew Vaughn or the guy who directed Chronicle.</p>
<p>Avoid as much CGI as possible and try your damnedest not to purposely rip-off Batman any more than you already have with the whole crazy rich white boy thing.</p>
<p>Otherwise, don&#8217;t even waste your time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WallyWest</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/marvel-comics-movies-characters-carl-6766/comment-page-4/#comment-479710</link>
		<dc:creator>WallyWest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:46:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=6766#comment-479710</guid>
		<description>@ carl

Id like to see somone portray Wolverine as i seen him on the 90&#039;s animated X-Men Series. But till then, i&#039;ll settle with Jackman. They should of someone taller than James Marsden as Cyclops.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ carl</p>
<p>Id like to see somone portray Wolverine as i seen him on the 90&#8242;s animated X-Men Series. But till then, i&#8217;ll settle with Jackman. They should of someone taller than James Marsden as Cyclops.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carl wayne</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/marvel-comics-movies-characters-carl-6766/comment-page-4/#comment-479660</link>
		<dc:creator>carl wayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 09:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=6766#comment-479660</guid>
		<description>jackman sucks as wolverine and i have been saying for years and years that benoit would have been perfect for the part</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jackman sucks as wolverine and i have been saying for years and years that benoit would have been perfect for the part</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zickened</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/marvel-comics-movies-characters-carl-6766/comment-page-4/#comment-476036</link>
		<dc:creator>Zickened</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 14:33:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=6766#comment-476036</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t find it ironic at all honestly.  It&#039;s all about their character lineup.  You have to have characters that appeal to the desires of humanity, a reason for people to sit in a chair for 2 hours and invest into a character and a brand.  With Batman, you have this dark, gritty character that has no super powers (other than being rich and intelligent and has a lean physique) and then you have Superman which has every f***ing cool power you could ever want.  That&#039;s it for the most part, with smaller characters that could be argued minutely about being given a title shot.  However, if you&#039;re going to produce a 200 million dollar movie, you want it to generate 200 million in ticket sales and 300 million in additional revenue.  Even Superman&#039;s reboots had a hard time doing that in a way that parallels Spiderman or Xmen unfortunately.  That&#039;s why you see the studios sitting on their hands with DC, they just don&#039;t have the viability or versatility that the Marvel universe has to create revenue and fan base.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t find it ironic at all honestly.  It&#8217;s all about their character lineup.  You have to have characters that appeal to the desires of humanity, a reason for people to sit in a chair for 2 hours and invest into a character and a brand.  With Batman, you have this dark, gritty character that has no super powers (other than being rich and intelligent and has a lean physique) and then you have Superman which has every f***ing cool power you could ever want.  That&#8217;s it for the most part, with smaller characters that could be argued minutely about being given a title shot.  However, if you&#8217;re going to produce a 200 million dollar movie, you want it to generate 200 million in ticket sales and 300 million in additional revenue.  Even Superman&#8217;s reboots had a hard time doing that in a way that parallels Spiderman or Xmen unfortunately.  That&#8217;s why you see the studios sitting on their hands with DC, they just don&#8217;t have the viability or versatility that the Marvel universe has to create revenue and fan base.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zickened</title>
		<link>http://screenrant.com/marvel-comics-movies-characters-carl-6766/comment-page-4/#comment-476033</link>
		<dc:creator>Zickened</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 14:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenrant.com/?p=6766#comment-476033</guid>
		<description>I have all 3 blade movies and I have to disagree completely.  I think the first blade was amazing, the second one was lackluster and the 3rd was awesome and breathed new life into the series.  Why?  Each character felt like they had depth and personality and a reason to be on screen.  Each character in the second one felt gimmicky and most of them were very throw away characters.  After seeing the 3rd one I was truly looking forward to a 4th one because I felt like the new cast could really run with the series.

I&#039;ll agree to the fact that Spiderman 3 felt more like a franchise milk movie than an actual sequel, especially as far as casting goes.  As much as I like Topher Bell and wish we saw more on-screen time with him, I really felt that he was a total disconnect from one of the most powerful and deep characters in the Spiderman franchise.  Venom is one part anti-hero and one part sadistic ruthlessness.  All they did with the character was make him a vengeance seeker, aka a black and white (no pun intended) cut out villain.  They could have put Madonna in the Venom suit and garnered the exact same reactions.  It just felt like so many wasted opportunities in the name of shameless merchandise advertisement.

As far as Punisher goes, I think the one with Thomas Jane was the best I&#039;ve seen.  That movie made me invest into the comics and seek out other works by Jane as well.  Jane really carried the movie which is surprising because stellar lifter John Travolta usually carries movies.  I think given the one dimensional archetypical character John played, he did relatively well but I thought the actors that really shined were his tenants and really looked forward to this farked up kind of alley cat family they had.  I was really looking forward to a sequel with all of them back in it together but alas, we got a money maker and not a franchise driver with Warzone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have all 3 blade movies and I have to disagree completely.  I think the first blade was amazing, the second one was lackluster and the 3rd was awesome and breathed new life into the series.  Why?  Each character felt like they had depth and personality and a reason to be on screen.  Each character in the second one felt gimmicky and most of them were very throw away characters.  After seeing the 3rd one I was truly looking forward to a 4th one because I felt like the new cast could really run with the series.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll agree to the fact that Spiderman 3 felt more like a franchise milk movie than an actual sequel, especially as far as casting goes.  As much as I like Topher Bell and wish we saw more on-screen time with him, I really felt that he was a total disconnect from one of the most powerful and deep characters in the Spiderman franchise.  Venom is one part anti-hero and one part sadistic ruthlessness.  All they did with the character was make him a vengeance seeker, aka a black and white (no pun intended) cut out villain.  They could have put Madonna in the Venom suit and garnered the exact same reactions.  It just felt like so many wasted opportunities in the name of shameless merchandise advertisement.</p>
<p>As far as Punisher goes, I think the one with Thomas Jane was the best I&#8217;ve seen.  That movie made me invest into the comics and seek out other works by Jane as well.  Jane really carried the movie which is surprising because stellar lifter John Travolta usually carries movies.  I think given the one dimensional archetypical character John played, he did relatively well but I thought the actors that really shined were his tenants and really looked forward to this farked up kind of alley cat family they had.  I was really looking forward to a sequel with all of them back in it together but alas, we got a money maker and not a franchise driver with Warzone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

