New ‘Maleficent’ Preview: The Classic Villain Comes to Life

Published 1 year ago by , Updated March 16th, 2014 at 5:11 pm,

With Disney currently raking in a considerable amount of its income from the Marvel cinematic universe (and will soon do the same with Star Wars), it’s easy to forget the robust stable of proprietary IP the company still has at hand. Digging deeply into that vault has resulted in the upcoming fantasy blockbuster Maleficent.

While the first trailer for Maleficent played largely as a standard preview for a modern fantasy epic (a la the tonally similar Snow White and the Huntsman), a new sneak peak at the film approaches the material from a different angle. Initially released via the Disney Channel, the new preview draws explicit comparisons between Maleficent and the movie it draws inspiration from, Sleeping Beauty.

Maleficent and Her Raven Angelina Jolie New Maleficent Preview: The Classic Villain Comes to Life

There is a certain advantage in such comparison, as it immediately drums up nostalgia for the Disney animated classic. At the same time, the original trailer derived a decent tension between its initial sense of mystery and the reveal of Angelina Jolie (Kung Fu Panda 3) as the titular dark fairy.

Some of the scene-by-scene comparisons actually do the newer film no favors. For instance, the difference between the vibrantly animated fairy godmothers of Sleeping Beauty and the somewhat wonky CGI creations of Maleficent could inspire more groans than gasps of awe.

Other than these somewhat mixed film comparisons, there’s plenty of material here that indicates that Maleficent could end up a cracking good adventure yarn. While I’m still not sold on Jolie’s attempts to humanize the villainess, all the fantastical goings-on about her could still make for a fun jaunt to the movies.

Other than Jolie, Maleficent stars Sharlto Copley (Chappie), Elle Fanning (The Boxtrolls), Imelda Staunton (the Harry Potter series), and Juno Temple (Horns).


Maleficent will cast its spell on theaters on May 30th, 2014.

Follow Kyle Hembree on Twitter @ProjectNightHam
Get our free email alerts on the topics and author of this article:


Post a Comment

GravatarWant to change your avatar?
Go to and upload your own (we'll wait)!

 Rules: No profanity or personal attacks.
 Use a valid email address or risk being banned from commenting.

If your comment doesn't show up immediately, it may have been flagged for moderation. Please try refreshing the page first, then drop us a note and we'll retrieve it. Keep in mind that we do not allow external links in the comments.

  1. I found no issue with the side by side comparisons. I think the comparisons and ‘wonky’ fairy godmothers are in keeping with this non-animated spooky version, which is the whole point. Personally, I can’t wait. No one plays formidabe female characters better than Jolie.

  2. Angelina Jolie playing spooky witch-like character…*yawn*

  3. That English accent is absolutely awful

    • Sounded absolutely fine to me.

    • Why do you think its meant to be an english accent ?

  4. Let me guess: in this version, Aurora cuts her finger on Maleficent’s cheekbones?

    • lol

  5. Well, some of the CG looks a little bit budget (hopefully will look better in the final film) but anything with more Sharlto Copley in it is fine by me.

  6. Angelina Jolie is a Goddess. Will watch this for her. Most stunning in all of Hollywood.

  7. It sounds like they are giving Maleficent good motives for doing the things she does. She seems to be trying to protect Beauty. That would actually be kind of cool.

  8. Sold.