Comments on: Louis Leterrier Would Do Hulk Sequel – More Likely To Happen Now?

By: Sonic Assassin

Sonic Assassin — Fri, 23 Oct 2009 02:08:36 +0000

I certainly hope so. Louis Leterrier did a MARVELOUS job with “Incredible Hulk 1″.

I didn’t mind Ang Lee’s version. Perhaps a darker, twisted art house action packed movie for the future? I would pay to see that but I don’t think the general masses would.

By: John

John — Sun, 18 Oct 2009 12:52:08 +0000

WOW, by far they`ve got the right actor to make into the debutes, just as actors like Bale, Reeve, Routh, and Maguire. Personally thought that both Clooney and Keaton were terrible choices in the 90`s Batman series though may have been the best choices as Batman, just saying. And with Iron Man 2 coming the way will it be Hulk making a cameo? Though one thing that doesn`t make sense about cameos is that it`s like the world of each superhero doesn`t know that the other superhero exists if the superhero solo films don`t mention the other superhero. I`m a bit condorly fashioned, but can they really make hulk have a cameo?

By: Hulk Smash Iron Man 2 Rumors! - Screen Rant

Hulk Smash Iron Man 2 Rumors! - Screen Rant — Wed, 16 Sep 2009 16:56:27 +0000

[...] Louis Leterrier Would Do Hulk Sequel – More Likely To Happen Now? [...]

By: Simon

Simon — Wed, 16 Sep 2009 08:29:01 +0000

I actually liked Ang Lee’s Hulk also. I thought the style was cool, it had a brain, and Sam Elliot usually is awesome to the point of mancrushhood. It just got a little weird towards the end thar, with the Hulk fighting a cloud or something.

By: stuntmanJ

stuntmanJ — Thu, 10 Sep 2009 23:34:15 +0000

Hulk comes in two flavors:
Smash everything Hulk or Existential Hulk.
Fans of the Hulk fall into either one of these categories, and some both.
I liked Ang Lee’s version and nobody is better than Sam Elliot as Gen. Ross.

By: Simon

Simon — Wed, 09 Sep 2009 15:51:09 +0000

Micheal, I’m beginning to doubt you even watched the latest Hulk movie. He fought the Abomination for something like the last twenty minutes. The Abomination was painted as slightly bigger than, and superior to the Hulk.
I’m never going to understand the troll mindset. To come on here and just rant in ways that make no sense at all is just weird.
Finally, the Hulk was originally the story of a man trying to control the fury within. That is what makes the Hulk movies different from the others, and that is what can make the movies most interesting. If you want to see cartoons beat each other up, wake up early on a Saturday morning. If you want to see something slightly intelligent, you can watch grownup movies.

By: Rob Keyes

Rob Keyes — Wed, 09 Sep 2009 14:07:10 +0000

@ 790,

I agree – I really didn’t like Lee’s Hulk, really enjoyed the new one.

By: michael

michael — Tue, 08 Sep 2009 18:07:40 +0000

marvel screwed up the hulk! please no more solo hulk movies.is there no one out there who can cast a supervillan equal or worthy of the hulk’s power/strength for him to fight? and just add only knockdown dragout toe to toe fight scene’s. please people want to be thrilled & entertained when they go to the movie’s not be put to sleep by watching the hulk smash army tanks & helicopters.read the damn comic books and cast a foe equal to the hulk! are you listening mr.louis letterier? that goes for you too marvel.

By: 790

790 — Sun, 06 Sep 2009 21:40:23 +0000

Lol, Bangarang, I actually threw the Ang Lee Hulk dvd in the trash afterwards. (I didn’t see it in the theater)

Norton’s Hulk I’ve watched a few times on dvd. The movie is that good!!!

By: Bangarang

Bangarang — Sun, 06 Sep 2009 21:16:38 +0000

Someone who like the Ang Lee version, definitely have to explain that to me. It was such a terrible movie. The Incredible Hulk was quite well done for me.

By: Simon

Simon — Thu, 03 Sep 2009 20:39:21 +0000

Michael:
First, you sound a bit like you’re talking smack about a fictional character. That rings odd.
Second, they spent about the span of the opening credits on origins in The Incredible Hulk.
I can’t imagine thinking Norton did a bad job. Is it because you liked Ang Lee’s The Hulk/Eric Bana’s performance more?

By: Simon

Simon — Thu, 03 Sep 2009 20:36:33 +0000

I wonder if the timing for Hulk 2 to follow the Avengers might hint that the Hulk will be a “bad guy” in the Avengers movie. That certainly would read with the close of the Incredible Hulk, wouldn’t it?
Also, the end of the Hulk indicates to me that Banner can now control his transformations. World War Hulk, anyone?

By: michael

michael — Thu, 03 Sep 2009 02:52:02 +0000

ed norton is the worst actor ever. he can’t act on a professional level,he need’s to go back to acting school for another ten year’s he stinks. and so does the hulk who can’t seem to pick on anyone his size. hulk only want’s to fight puny humans rather than supered powered villians who can stand toe to toe with him. the hulk movie suck’s along with ed norton. let john favreau direct a hulk movie he knows what he’s doing and stop focusing on the origin story for god’s sake you eat up too much screen time doing this!
1

By: Phil G

Phil G — Wed, 02 Sep 2009 11:08:10 +0000

I’m of mixed opinions on this. I hate that Norton was so full of himself that he wanted to control how the entire Incredible Hulk movie would be like. On the other hand, I did agree with him as to how it should have been like.

Either way he did make a far better Banner than Bana did, but I also wouldn’t care much if they found another capable actor to fill these unfortunate shoes.

In any case, I do think Louis Leterrier wanting to do the sequel is good news (this IS what this article is about, isn’t it?)

He shouldn’t be too concerned with the fans who liked the Ang Lee movie. I don’t think anybody would disagree that his own Hulk movie was much closer to the comics and that’s what the majority of us really want to see.

By: 790

790 — Wed, 02 Sep 2009 05:09:48 +0000

I have to admit that Nortons representation of Bruce Banner sold me, like Toby did with Spider-Man.

I’m all for a sequel with Ed Norton!!!
Anything else would be 6 steps backward.

By: ken x

ken x — Wed, 02 Sep 2009 03:32:10 +0000

I agree, If Ed Norton isnt bruce banner, itll def be a shame!

By: adrian

adrian — Tue, 01 Sep 2009 21:00:41 +0000

@Luke and Leia’s Love Child
Ya, had to bribe my uncle and wife into watching ‘IH’ just because they thought it was exactly the same borefest…they loved ‘IH’.

By: Lord Garth, Formerly of Izar

Lord Garth, Formerly of Izar — Tue, 01 Sep 2009 20:19:38 +0000

I want a sequel. The film was terrific!! And it had the Illusionist as Banner!

By: INK

INK — Tue, 01 Sep 2009 18:37:29 +0000

I think this is very possible. With Paramount having distribution rights to the next 5 Marvel films (i.e. IM2, Capt. Am, Avengers, Thor, and IM3) I would think Disney would want to capitalize on the comic book movie seen and get another movie out before 5 years down the road. Hulk would be a good fit because he already has brand recognition.

By: pumpkin_king

pumpkin_king — Tue, 01 Sep 2009 17:50:11 +0000

Yes yes yes yes and yes. Ed Norton is a perfect Banner, The Incredible Hulk is, so far, my favorite comic-book adaptation from Marvel. I Think what Marvel Studios did with Iron Man and Hulk were great, and they need keep doing what they plan on doing. I believe with the new Disney/Marvel situation these movies could be kicked out in no time and in great (if not greater) quality. I can’t wait, and I hope everyone returns for the sequel.