Jesse Eisenberg As Lex Luthor: Why It Could Work

Published 9 months ago by

-

Acting Ability

Jesse Eisenberg Lex Luthor Reactions Jesse Eisenberg As Lex Luthor: Why It Could Work

There is no question that Eisenberg was an unexpected pick – listeners of the Screen Rant Underground heard our live reaction to the news – and given the lack of blockbuster roles, could be seen as a potentially risky one. We would add that Eisenberg’s casting suddenly makes Ben Affleck’s need to play a millionaire seem like a walk in the park.

We’ve already explained why the odds are good of seeing an insecure, isolated, but nonetheless determined and driven Luthor are good – and when faced with the hulking mass of Henry Cavill, neither substantial height nor weight would make Lex a serious threat – something a man as smart as Luthor wouldn’t need to find that out the hard way (not that he’d ever lower himself to throwing punches in the first place).

So if Eisenberg is going to be playing a somewhat unlikable, but intelligent and self-motivated millionaire, willing to go to some extreme ends to achieve his goal, then the actor has already earned accolades for doing just that.

Jesse Eisenberg in The Social Network Jesse Eisenberg As Lex Luthor: Why It Could Work

It’s no surprise that people are immediately pointing to Eisenberg’s performance of Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg in director David Fincher’s The Social Network, given that it was his highest-profile role to date (which earned him an Oscar nomination for Best Actor). While the honor of being nominated for an Academy Award makes him fit in even better with the rest of Snyder’s existing Superman cast – and the brand new ‘Alfred,’ Jeremy Irons – it proves he can bring what’s needed for an updated Lex.

Let’s take a look at the aspects of Eisenberg’s performance our own Kofi Outlaw chose to highlight in his review of The Social Network:

“Eisenberg… portrays Mark Zuckerberg as something of a tragically ironic figure: an acerbic genius who is totally clueless when it comes to human interaction; a guy who earns fortune and fame off a website dedicated to social circling, but has very few “real friends” to call his own.”

“Eisenberg flat-out steals just about every scene he’s in, glaring at people around him like they are nitwits, while delivering scathing insights that could make a person feel that very way. A definite standout performance that is worthy of recognition (provided people don’t find his character too unlikable).”

No explanation is needed to show why those noteworthy facets to Eisenberg’s portrayal of an unlikeable entrepreneur would serve him well for a magnate like Luthor, but the roles aren’t quite as clear-cut as some might believe. After all, an actor with as respectable a resume as Eisenberg isn’t going to simply play the same role twice.

The Social Network Jesse Eisenberg Jesse Eisenberg As Lex Luthor: Why It Could Work

Where Zuckerberg was an introverted, anti-social genius more at home in his sweatpants on a computer than a board room, Lex Luthor clearly has no problems with recognition. Man of Steel was filled with references to LexCorp, dotting everything from the skyline, to shipping containers; meaning Luthor is no shrinking violet in the eyes of the public.

Still, thinking back to the scathing condescension with which the character addressed those who couldn’t understand the need for social media, or skirting the line between analytical and sociopathic, the potential is there for a Lex whose intellect and confidence are his greatest weapons – tools which make larger, stronger, and less subtle men into fools, not heroes.

________________________________________

NEXT PAGE: Range & Novelty

________________________________________

« 1 2 3»

Get our free email alerts on the topics and author of this article:
TAGS: batman vs superman, superman

339 Comments

Post a Comment

GravatarWant to change your avatar?
Go to Gravatar.com and upload your own (we'll wait)!

 Rules: No profanity or personal attacks.
 Use a valid email address or risk being banned from commenting.


If your comment doesn't show up immediately, it may have been flagged for moderation. Please try refreshing the page first, then drop us a note and we'll retrieve it.

  1. You know something, I’m betting most of you never read the comics, that’s why you could care less. I’ll bet if some white guy played Shaft, people would go apes#*t!

  2. While at first I was really taken aback and thought “what the heck were they thinking?”, after reading this article I’m OK with the decision, if they can pull it off well. Also accepting Affleck as Batman, but I still can’t fathom Gadot being good as WW. Haha, I guess 2 out of 3 ain’t bad.

    • This movie will be pure s%*t

  3. “He’ll be a more believable character” right cause their tons of billionare twenty year olds

    • …as opposed to there being a lot of extremely evil business who fight aliens?

      Not to mention that Jesse is in his 30′s, same age as Kal in this…

    • Never heard of Mark Zuckerberg I take it?

  4. It’s funny, when I hear the name Jessie Eisenberg being in a Superman movie I think of Jimmy Olson. Zack Snyder thinks of Lex Luthor. His casting was great in Watchmen and 300. Was he drunk when he made these decisions?

    This clearly is what will happen will you rush a project. Mistake after mistake waiting to happen. And yes, I admit that maybe with an outstanding script, the movie could be a hit, but the fact that they made Luthor twenty five with hair, and gave us a Wonder Woman that can’t act, and considered having WW come from Krypton???

    I can’t believe there are still people out there insisting this movie might be okay.

    • How can you say that this project was rushed? If anything it has been dragging its feet since day one. The people who insist that this movie could be okay are trying to be optimistic in the face of the constant negativity that is thrown out at every turn Warner/DC takes. Could there have been better casting? Possibly, but if we don’t know the story that the movie is telling then we can’t say this actor would have been a better Lex or this guy should have been Batman with 100% certainty.

    • Dude, #1 Eisenberg is 30, the same age as Cavill. #2The WW from Krypton stuff is not something that was ever considered. It originated with the editor of Batman on Film who offered it up as a mere thought of his own, not based on anything he knew. As for WW herself, Gadot hasn’t been in enough films to know whether or not she can act. So the jury is out there. #3 We have no idea whether or not this version of Luthor will have hair or not.

      Pass a real judgement when you actually see something on screen.

      • For the record? Eisenberg WILL keep his hair.

        And if the product isn’t rushed? Why are so many superheroes suddenly appearing in part 2? Why not make a solo WW movie before squeezing her into a Man of Steel sequel?

        I know many have been waiting for this movie impatiently. I’m one of them. However, I’m also realistic. I’m not getting my hopes up only to have them shot down by the time the end credits begin to roll.

        • I’m assuming Wonder Woman will be in the movie because the story calls for it not just because they could. Also the news about Wonder Woman being in the film was released in 2013. That’s 2 years before the original release date. I don’t see how that qualifies as suddenly appearing. The reason for not doing a Wonder Woman solo movie is that it is too big of a risk. DC/WB is trying to begin a whole new universe and are not able to take that risk right now. They need to make money off their bankable stars (Batman & Superman) before they can take that risk.

          • Point taken. However, DC has themselves to blame. They depend on Superman and Batman way too much. I still say they should have a solo WW movie first.

            I think I speak for many, when I say we are fed up with those two characters and would like to see someone new. We’ve already seen six Superman films and eight Batman films. Isn’t that enough?

            Green Lantern was a refreshing change of pace. True the movie didn’t do well, but that’s what happens when you cast wrong. And I still have many doubts about the casting for this movie as well.

            Aside from the casting, DC has so many fascinating characters but never use them. I would love to see a Flash, Aquaman, or even a movie about Vigilante from the 80′s. Hell, a Spectre movie could be insane! Especially with the effects we can do now!

            • I understand that you want a Wonder Woman solo movie first, but with all the failure to get the character a movie in the past it just seems like too big of a risk without first introducing the character in Man of Steel 2.

              I know that we’ve seen a lot of Superman and Batman movies but in this cinematic universe there is only one Superman movie that exist. While I would like to see new heroes (Nightwing, Aquaman, or another Green Lantern) I know that we can’t until they use their money making heroes.

              Green Lantern’s problems went past just the casting. There was a lot wrong with that movie.

              I too want to see some different DC characters on the big screen, but that won’t happen if they can’t get their cinematic universe off the ground and that starts with Batman & Superman.

              • True, GL had several things wrong with it. And maybe having a cameo in MOS 2 may be the only solution, but there’s no denying there’s a huge demand to see her on the big screen. Which you think DC would find encouraging. There’s even a fan made trailer that I think is awesome.

                I think if DC is going to go down that road, they should do what Marvel did. Just give us a little glimpse and then the solo film.

                Thor wasn’t too popular among Super Heroes and after the Captain America flop in 1990 and the Hulk from 2003, I’m sure Marvel was afraid to take a risk as well.

                Hopefully, DC will gradually introduce new characters instead of jamming them together in one or two movies.

                In fact, maybe a well known character isn’t the answer. Perhaps DC should make a movie with a hero we’re unfamiliar with. (And yes, I remember Jonah Hex)lol

                Either way, it’s hard to predict the outcome. But with a good script and good casting, I believe a movie could be a hit regardless which hero it’s about.

                Let’s keep our fingers crossed.

            • A Spectre movie would be killer!

  5. They’re squeezing her in cause they got no faith in the character

  6. Whichever true or rumor, this movie will be a waste of time and money. Ours and theirs!

  7. If appearances do not matter, then why does the height of the male actor matter ?

  8. Cause they’re not meant to be eye candy for the public.

  9. I
    h a v e n o p e n i s

  10. This shall indeed be interesting to watch,
    whether its a flop or a complete success.

  11. Am I the only who thinks Jesse Eiseberng’actions and actitudes as Mark Zuckenberg in the “Social Network were like thing than Lex Luthor could do?…. LOL.

    • That’s what I first thought of when I learned of Eisenberg’s casting. :)

  12. Okay i really dont mind them trying something new… but i have to be Honest i love the Batfleck idea and i know hell be great i love Cavils Sup and i think even though gal gadot isnt fitting as the role of wonderwomand ill give it a try because i really loved her in the FFF so thats that but i just cant take Eisenberg seriously i dont like his acting and never liked any of his movies, so i know hell never make a great Luthor and even if in the big run hell make it ill still not like it sry but thats my opinion i dont like eisenberg and think hell be a bad luthor….

  13. I personally think he will be perfect! I think he can pretty much devour any role given to him and shine. I particularly love this article explaining the reasons that I think are spot on! And loving these characters through the years when only comics were read and no movies were made. I embrace the ability to take a character, change it but give it the depth that is needed to reflect the essence of what it should portray. Perfect example…Heath Ledger on the Joker! An amazing dark and psychotic portrayal of a villain that outshine the “Good’guy”/Hero. This is the type of acting ability and creativity I am hoping to see in his portrayal and I can’t wait!!

  14. Having Jesse portray Lex is probably the worst idea I have ever heard. Lex is pure evil and totally BALD!!!! I don’t care what they say ….shave his damn head!! This really bothers me!! I’ve always been a fan of the villians and for Zach Snider to totally mess up a movie that has such great potential such as this one, it really bothers me. Do it right Zach!!!

  15. Eeh… I’m not too concerned about Jesse’s acting when it come to a villain like Lex, but his physical stature just doesn’t seem to fit him. That’s not to say I haven’t been paying attention, whenever I see an actor portraying him in live action they have Lexes’ character favoring the spindally chip-on-shoulder type super villain. With this casting choice I can only surmise the plan is to push this to an extreme, while giving Lex a more believable character. I have nothing against the kind of character development detailed in this article, but just once I’d like to see an actor play Lex who looks as though he’s also bettered himself physically, not just mentally. It’s something I’ve liked about this villain when portrayed in the animations and many of the comics.

    • I should add that, so far, I thought Michael Rosenbaum’s portrayal was probably the closest live action example to the Lex that I’d want to see on the big screen, in terms of physique and psychological motivation.