Related Posts:

16 Comments


Gravatar
Jose Torres said,
October 27th, 2008 

Couldn’t Agree with you more, saw it this weekend..Awesome

Gravatar
John "Kahless" Taylor said,
October 27th, 2008 

Hmmm, never even heard of this film, and I am into vampire-lore as well. It’s a shame it’s not playing in the DC area….yet. Thanks, Kofi; I’ll be looking for it.

Gravatar
INK said,
October 27th, 2008 

“The American remake is scheduled for a 2010 release.”

The scariest sentence of all.

Gravatar
October 27th, 2008 

American version of this = gag me.

I’m looking forward to seeing this when it arrives on DVD.

Great review, Kofi.

Vic

Gravatar
Gary said,
October 28th, 2008 

Sounds creepy
Might see it though.

Gravatar
Hallow Scorp said,
November 6th, 2008 

This movie starts playing here in San Francisco @ the Bridge tomorrow. i can’t wait to see it!

Gravatar
Thrustinga Power said,
November 9th, 2008 

I just watched this movie based on all the recommendations and glowing reviews. It is without a doubt one of the most boring movies of any kind I’ve seen this year.

Nuanced, haunting, chilling are all just euphamisms for BORING that are used by reviewers and movie snogs to sound like they’re somehow above the trappings of “traditional entertainment.” I submit that the only reasons anyone likes this movie are its overly long, has subtitles so they feel like they’re doing something intellectual, and its so boring that suddenly their mind starts racing to find meaning where there is none. They CONVINCE themselves that they MUST be missing something if they don’t like it and therefore start to proclaim its AWESOME and everyone that sees it for the crap that it is, “just doesn’t get it.”

Gravatar
November 9th, 2008 

@Thrusting

Well to each his own. Here at Screen Rant most of us HATED Transformers while most people seemed to love it.

Maybe you’ll enjoy Twilight.

Vic

Gravatar
Hallow Scorp said,
November 9th, 2008 

Personally, I think this is one of the classiest horror movies I’ve ever seen. I’ve read a lot of vampire fiction from different eras, and this film harkens back to such classics as “Carmilla” in the way it’s tale unfolds.
For those looking for standard horror fare, beware: this is an art film. It takes it’s time, is very understated and is not going to hit you over the head with obvious emotional beats, a bombastic score or explicit gore. It is not an action movie, but rather a character driven film with a slowly mounting sense of dread. Patient viewers will be rewarded with lots of atmosphere, subtext and moral ambiguity.
Definitely one of the most elegant vampire films made and a treat for sophisticated tastes.

Gravatar
William said,
November 10th, 2008 

I just saw the film last night and am haunted by the implications for both lead characters. What is so striking to me about the narrative is that it implies the story has already happened before, and we see the end and the beginning of the central love story. It makes the film’s tragic inevitability resonate long after it ends. Far from boring, this is a rare and beautiful movie about the intersection between dependence and love that makes monstrous demands on everyone involved. The devil is definitely in the details and how you interpret them. For me, it’s a heart-shattering film that made me wish for an end to the metaphysical trap of immortality for Eli and everyone she touches. This film restores the existential horror of the vampire’s condition to the genre, something it’s been lacking for decades.

Gravatar
Dan said,
November 11th, 2008 

Great review. It’s my favourite film of 2008 so far, and while it sits on my shelf beside 2 Nosferatu’s and a Vampyr, I enjoyed this film much more than any of those.

Gravatar
November 28th, 2008 

“the movie has achieved one of the near-impossible feats of telling a good vampire story: keeping the human drama elevated above the monster madness.”

I agree. This is something that almost never happens.Studios usually want effects and so forth, which leaves little time for the inner workings of the characters.

“This film doesn’t need to be remade: it needs to be dissected, so that more American filmmakers can observe and understand the fact that it is subtlety and nuance that help films transcend their medium; horror filmmakers need to be reminded that good horror films in fact HORRIFY us by having bad things happen to fully-formed characters we’re actually rooting for. Stock victims and buckets of blood be damned.”

I read his interview about the remake. He makes good points about how flawed films should be remade, not good ones like his film.

The fact that you don’t see Eli fly or show fangs(I don’t think she has any, hence the mess) are subtleties that I like to see. Your imagination fills in the rest.

Your asking too much of filmmakers when requesting fully formed characters. They have blood buckets and bare breasts to produce. One of the last times I saw characters even approaching three dimensions in a horror movie was in Wolf Creek.

By the way, I didn’t like Transformers either. ;)

“Maybe you’ll enjoy Twilight”

Lol.

@William
That is one of the things I liked about the ending the most. The implications of what is to befall Oskar. We already saw it in the man (Hakan)that was protecting and providing for Eli previously.

Here is my full review for Let The Right One In:
http://film-book.com/review-let-the-right-one-in/

What's your opinion? Leave a comment!
GravatarWant to change your avatar?
Go to Gravatar.com and upload your own (we'll wait)!

 Name (*required)

 Email Address (*private)

 Website (optional)

 Rules: No profanity or personal attacks.
 Use a valid email address or risk being banned from commenting.


If your comment doesn't show up immediately, it may have been flagged for moderation. Please try refreshing the page first, then drop us a note and we'll retrieve it.