Recent Related Items:

98 Comments


Ken J says:

@kofi

lol, distinction noted. I’ll probably end up renting this one. Always curious when a horror flick gets high critical ratings…

Daniel F says:

Are you seriously asking what i’m talking about? Multiple people saying “OMG America touching this film how terrible.” One of them being you even. To me it is like saying America can’t possibly produce films as good as films from other countries.

ppnkof says:

@ Daniel,

In case you haven’t heard, Conservative pro-America is pretty much the thing on this site.

I think what people are saying is that in some cases, American remakes of foreign films can be a disaster. A few examples:

Point of No Return
The Grudge
The Grudge 2
(Some people would argue) The Ring
The Ring 2
The Eye
Dark Water
One Missed Call
Blow Out

Here’s how seldom American remakes of foreign films turn out better than the original:

The Departed
(Some would argue) The Ring

See the difference? That’s all they’re saying.

Ken J says:

Kofi, another really recent example of an American remake being worse than its foreign counterpart would be Quarantine.

But I think it needs to be made clear that the thing that makes these remakes bad is NOT the fact that it’s American. I HOPE nobody’s intended statement was that. I read it as them saying that remakes by a different country in general are pretty bad, which I would have to agree. Examples escape my mind at the moment, but I do remember there have been several American movies that have been remade by other countries and they were downright horrible…

Dan says:

I don’t think The Departed is as good as Infernal Affairs – it takes itself way too seriously, every moment and gesture is precious. I like Infernal Affairs much better.

Daniel F says:

Wow I didn’t even know The Departed was a remake at all.

So far all the movies I see on there as remakes well kind of sucked as originals as well. You may disagree, but aside from the two I haven’t seen the original ones from other countries sucked just as bad as the remakes.

@Daniel F

People talking about not wanting an American remake of ONE movie is not “hatred for all things American seems to run[ing] through this site.”

As Kofi pointed out, if anything Screen Rant slants Conservative and pro-America in both posts and comments from visitors overall.

Your comment seemed to me to be stating that the writers here slam American movies every other day.

Vic

SK47 says:

Really Vic, the DVD is out this week?
This film is absolutely great, it is art! Do you know of any special features on the release?
I hear that the remake is going to be helmed by the director of Cloverfield, eh, I would say wrong choice. Definately wrong choice! If you are going to do an amercian remake, I would say Alex Proyas for the directing job!

@SK47

Kofi said it comes out this week, I haven’t double checked that but since he loved the movie so much I figured he would know.

Vic

ppnkof says:

SK47,

DVD hits shelves (or Netflix) tomorrow, March 10, 2009.

SK47 says:

Thanks guys, I just checked on amazon, nothing in the way of special features, hurm…but it is also a Blu-Ray release! The winter atmosphere would look incredible!
Matt Reeves, thats the name of the fool who is attempting to remake this!

steven the git says:

The term ‘american remake’ is more of an exasperating one simply as they tend to be done for easy money and lose all that worked in the originals.

I’d definitely add the Vanishing to that list.
Personally, wouldn’t say Departed or the Ring are better than Infernal Affairs or Ringu. Especially the latter.

But!
I’d say the Italian Job remake was better than the original. Apart from the end bit, the original isn’t that good.

I’d also add that the British remake of the Mean Machine (Longest Yard) was poor compared to the original. But then so was the other remake.

Suunaabas says:

A couple things:

Reeves’ version is not going to be a “re-make”, but rather a separate adaptation of the book. He’s doing the script and direction for it, putting his spin on how he interpreted the book. Personally, I don’t see how any casting could touch this original. Nor the camera work and scoring. Oh, and the new working title sounds uhm… rather lame “Let Me In” takes away from the message of the plot. But who knows, it could turn out a good flick. One thing’s for sure, more people will hear about the original after it hits the theaters -whether that turns out a good or bad thing.

What I’ve heard from the grapevine is the U.S. version will have deleted scenes, while the Swedish release has commentary instead. Swedes have confirmed the commentary, and even translated. As a few holding the U.S. version also confirm the deleted scenes. Some nice confirmations, and some new light shed as well. Hopefully an expanded edition will come out later, with both commentary and deleted scenes. Both extra material sounds like quality content, but not overly in-depth to shatter the film’s strengths.

Glad you bumped this back up to the front page Vic. This film deserves it.

Let the Right One In DVD CONTEST
http://film-book.com/contest-let-the-right-one-in-dvd/

Let the Right One In TRAILERS & CLIP
http://film-book.com/let-the-right-one-in-trailers/

Let the Right One In RED-BAND TRAILER
http://film-book.com/let-the-right-one-in-red-band-trailer/

Daniel says:

The director mentioned in several interviews he took about a year to cast the young leads. Then he spent time casting another actress to dub the female lead’s voice for the entire movie. That voice, even if you don’t understand Swedish, is an important part of her character.

The DVD defaults to an English dub. The voice acting in the dub is very, very bad. Do yourself a favor and watch with Swedish dialog and English subtitles.

Ken J says:

@Daniel, usually when a movie is redubbed into another language it is done poorly. Look at Chinese movies with English dubbing. They are horrible. And on the flip side, look at American movies with Spanish or Chinese dubbing, OMG… Just keep everything in their native language please… lol

Elfin Slade says:

Tonight i went and saw this film in a local movie theater and was impressed enough to seek out a website to post my comment on. I don’t think i’ve ever posted comments about movies before, or at least i don’t remember. It is that good :-) Anyhow:
it may sound absurd but this movie is not about vampires and bloodshed. it is about adolescent psychology.
This movie has only 1 character – the boy. all other subjects and events are time-compressed concurrent outcomes of his possible choices in life. it is about the boy’s becoming deeply aware of own existence, his past, and the infinite paths of human experience. even the drawn-out length of the film has its intent: time is irrelevant. what may seem like a long time to the viewer is really only a fleeting moment of vivid imagination.
Eli is of course his imaginary friend who is neither male nor female, but a strong-willed entity that eventually needs to “go away in order to survive”, i.e. for the child to develop into a young man. Not simply dissipate like a dream but dissolve constructively, hence becoming a part of his psyche. open minds learn from each other exponentially. through this experience he learns to understand emotions and to comprehend his rage and thirst for vengeance. the title is precisely about that – choose which thoughts you let into your mind. i gotta admit this is one of the deepest stories i’ve seen in my life. of course it may be my imagination running amok here and this explanation is simply coincidental to the filmmakers’ intent, a la mulholland drive craze.

Elfin Slade says:

great times indeed. I was still high the next day from watching this movie :-) then on friday night i went to see MDC play live and it was awesome /,,/. tonite i went back for a second look at the movie but it was sold out! so i decided to write some more instead.

continuing my opinion, I want to emphasize one crucial scene where eli first comes to oskar’s window. he lets this strange being into his domain, perhaps only to find out how “she” got to there. remember what the vampire told him – it is not a girl, for gender is irrelevant to a pure thought. nor is it a human being for it is as cold as the night. nor are they holding hands while in bed. –>

Oskar’s “vision” (most of film’s story) starts and ends in the few moments when he is touching the cold window in his room. in the beginning it’s his way of saying “good night” to the world and feeling her almost majestic frozen presence through the glass. the night’s presence. i know this feeling exactly, because i’ve done this mini-ritual in my childhood. people from northern countries know what i’m writing about. can’t get that effect in most of USA – not cold enough. it is a small step towards perceiving the energy of the universe, though very effective.

back to the movie – it is not the vampire at the window. his own mind looks at him through the window – “through the looking glass”. it is oskar’s first encounter with self-consciousness, he is seeing himself from the side. and this is the crucial step when he decides to open the window (his mind) to something new. he welcomes a part of his mind that was unknown until now into the light. it is commonly known that a sense of touch can transcend into a dream. in oskar’s “dream” he sees the flipside of the real world. it is not a cold vampire behind him in bed, it is the cold window in front. eli’s cold hand is not holding his left had – he is touching the cold glass with his right hand. a question arises what will change if he chooses to keep this new awareness (going steady) and he answers to himself – nothing yet. for now it is just a turning point towards a new learning process.
“feed your head”.

Firewalker says:

I loved the film “Let the Right one in” but I feel compelled to defend the remake.
here are my reasons.
1) A film should not be prejudge before it’s made, because of other films.

2) The director of “let me in” is Matt Reeves, who has just made one of the scariest films ever made “Cloverfield”. “let the Right one in” is a great film but let’s face it. It was not that scary. So if the acting holds up and the emotional content is there we have a possibility of the making a great scary horror film.

3) The Book ‘Let the right one in’ has so much content left out of the film that Matt Reeves can and should enchance and expand on the storyline.

Don’t prejudge.

Based on the history of foreign films remade as American versions, you’ll pardon us if we’re more than a bit skeptical about this one.

Vic

Firewalker says:

yes, I know i’ve seen my share.

Maybe Reeves should do the sequel, I already have the plot

The ever popular heavy-goth metal band “Blood-Thirsty” makes it american debut tour Fronted by the much wanted sexual charged lead singer Oskar. but wait a minute the hype in America is not about Oskar its about the mysterious Hypnotic twelve year old drummer ELI…….A reporter starts to link the band with the mysterious deaths of beautiful young girls….. You know where I’m going with this?…….LOL

firewalker

SIN187UM says:

I have to agree that HOLLYWOOD NEEDS TO STOP REMAKING JAPANESE HORROR FILMS. THEY SUCK!

Hopefully this dvd will be worth the free rental I used at blockbuster today.

Cloverfield was scary?

Longshanks says:

Just out of curiosity to all those who liked this movie,if this really isn’t a horror movie,or is supposed to be “more” than a horror movie,then what was so “haunting about it?

I just recently watched this movie expecting something truly great,and what I got was pretentious mediocrity.

Like one of the early posters said,it was extremely boring,and I will add,awkwardly paced,and had too many scenes that didn’t amount to anything or help move the story along.The acting was just ok,and there were too many characters that were just kinda useless.

Now Before I watched it,I had absolutely no idea of what to expect,except that it was a Swedish vampire movie.I think that some of the things were just ok,some of them I actually laughed out loud at,and a couple were actually pretty good,but most of the time I found myself saying “when is this going to go somewhere?”

I personally feel like that sometimes there are films that’s just on the fringe of being a “different” type of film without actually going over to the David Lynch side of “different”,that a lot of people latch onto it for dear life like it’s a new holy grail of movies and that if they like it then they belong to some sort of special club of movie connoisseurs.Donnie Darko,No Country For Old Men,The Fountain,Pan’s Labyrinth,all movies that I personally don’t understand what all the rave was about,and this movie fits perfectly into that puzzle of not so good movies that everyone seems to love so much.

And before anyone says it,I don’t give a rat’s @ss about Twilight.

J BIZ says:

I finally got to see this film and I loved it. I recommend it to all fans of film.

SIN187UM says:

@ppnkof

I’d have to say Infernal Affairs was better than The Departed. Mainly what killed it for me was the opening narrative that really had nothing to do with the film except to show Nicholson’s character was a turd.
———————————————————————
Well I willed myself through the film finally. Though the film was good it was just BORING to me. This seemed more like a drama/soft love story with a vampire more than horror. It used a standard formula of an outcast usually picked on who becomes or befriends a supernatural force to help him/her gain some sort of confidence to get back at their tormentors. The only thing that I saw that could be remotely haunting was the eyes and how the girl had a body crafted by Andre Toulon. Im not even sure why that scene was necessary….??? I guess the definition of horror has changed because most new horror movies fail at it. And sorry but there was not scary about Cloverfield, just a better version of Godzilla. I’d have to also disagree with the comment on the dvd box cover of best vampire movie ever, for me it’s The Lost Boys.

Dell says:

It is a slow moving movie but I don’t see it as boring at all. It takes it’s time to actually let things develop without forcing them by hurrying us along from one action scene to the next. For me, this made it an excellent movie. I do agree that it is much more a drama than a horror movie.

And that there was nothing even remotely scary about “Cloverfield.”

Firewalker says:

Cloverfield not scary???
Are you a horror fan?
Are you alive or are you a member of the living dead?
I don’t suppose you found the Blair Witch Project scary either?

baker2d says:

Cloverfield was an amazing movie, but not remotely scary. Also, Blair Witch was as scary as 28 Days Later, not scary at all.

Firewalker says:

Just my point. George Romero was right!
They walk amongst us

SIN187UM says:

@ Firewalker

Not everyone scares as easily as you. Being a horror fan doesn’t mean believing that everything tagged as horror is scary. Did you have nightmares for a month after watching Cloverfield and blairwitch? Furthermore Blair Witch not scary either. Sorry but not many horror movies produced now a days are scary. Mostly they give wtf moments and damn he/she got jacked up moments. Being a fan of horror doesn’t mean being a mindless sheep that just says yes its labeled as horror so its scary. Furthermore Cloverfield was more Sci-Fi than horror.

Page 2 of 3«123»
What's your opinion? Leave a Reply!
GravatarWant to change your avatar?
Go to Gravatar.com and upload your own (we'll wait)!

 Name (*required)

 Email Address (*private)

 Website (optional)

 Rules: No profanity or personal attacks.
 Use a valid email address or risk being banned from commenting.


If your comment doesn't show up immediately, it may have been flagged for moderation. Please try refreshing the page first, then drop us a note and we'll retrieve it.