J.J. Abrams Update: Star Trek Sequel & Mission: Impossible IV

Published 6 years ago by , Updated February 15th, 2014 at 4:27 pm,

Today we have some of J.J. Abrams news about two sequels from two big franchises: Star Trek and Mission: Impossible IV. The Star Trek news hints at what the sequel to Abrams’ successful Star Trek reboot might be about. And the M:I IV update is on the current status of the film, and whether Abrams will be directing or not.


LA Times Hero Complex got a chance to catch up with Abrams and Trek co-writer, Roberto Orci, on the set of the second season of Fringe, and they naturally got around to asking about the next film in the now rebooted Trek franchise. The replies from both Abrams and Orci were very interesting and exciting. First, here’s what Abrams said:

“The ambition for a sequel to ‘Star Trek’ is to make a movie that’s worthy of the audience and not just another movie, you know, just a second movie that feels tacked on. The first movie was so concerned with just setting up the characters — their meeting each and galvanizing that family — that in many ways a sequel will have a very different mission. it needs to do what [the late 'Trek' creator Gene] Roddenberry did so well, which is allegory. It needs to tell a story that has connection to what is familiar and what is relevant. It also needs to tell it in a spectacular way that hides the machinery and in a primarily entertaining and hopefully moving story. There needs to be relevance, yes, and that doesn’t mean it should be pretentious. If there are simple truths — truths connected to what we live — that elevates any story — that’s true with any story.”

Orci followed that up with this:

“We’ve literally had two meetings now. We haven’t decided anything but we’re starting to circle around some ideas. We got a lot of fan response from the first one and a considerable amount of critical response and one of the things we heard was, ‘Make sure the next one deals with modern-day issues.’ We’re trying to keep it as up-to-date and as reflective of what’s going on today as possible. So that’s one thing, to make it reflect the things that we are all dealing with today.”

On top of that, Abrams and Orci were asked if modern day issues meant the likes of war, politics, terrorism, the ethics of torture and so forth – “Well yeah, those are the kind of issues we’re talking about… that’s the way we’re thinking, that’s an approach…”

star trek header J.J. Abrams Update: Star Trek Sequel & Mission: Impossible IV

As Cinematical points out (and this is inevitable with a franchise like this) there’s a lot of yay or nay discussions being sparked around the web amongst Trek fans about whether or not “dealing with modern day issues” is the way to go. Some are all for it, wanting it to feel more like the 1960′s original TV series, while others feel having anything that deals directly with what’s going on today will make it feel dated in the years to come. Of course, the latter is only true once the issues of today no longer become relevant (and the issues brought up above I don’t think are going anywhere, anytime soon…).

Personally, I’d like to see them deal with modern issues, so long as they don’t lay it on too thick, making the next movie JUST about that. The franchise still needs to have plenty of room for the great characters who were re-introduced so well in this summer’s Star Trek, as well as concentrate on great adventure stories. I trust the directing and writing team (the latter will see Lost co-writer, Damon Lindelof, joining) will find a way to get the balance right.

(Head to pg. 2 for Mission: Impossible IV info)

« 1 2»

Get our free email alerts on the topics and author of this article:


Post a Comment

GravatarWant to change your avatar?
Go to Gravatar.com and upload your own (we'll wait)!

 Rules: No profanity or personal attacks.
 Use a valid email address or risk being banned from commenting.

If your comment doesn't show up immediately, it may have been flagged for moderation. Please try refreshing the page first, then drop us a note and we'll retrieve it. Keep in mind that we do not allow external links in the comments.

  1. Todd says: ” tell a real story.”

    Without a serious narrative, what kind of story can you tell? You say you want shootout at the OK corral but it can’t mean anything. Then wouldn’t you be happier to just play Asteroids, Pacman or something like that? This past summer’s “Star Trek was about as “Wrath of Khan” like as you could get, without just plain retelling the story. Which is what you suggest. How about they make a comedy?

    Todd you shouldn’t waste your time at the movies. If your too young to do things like learn how to sky dive or hang out at the fire house, you should take up trick skating, wrestling, or boxing…

  2. Yah Todd, if you don’t like preachy message movies, you should stop watching movies!

    I’m kidding, I agree, but it really just depends on what JJ Abrams or the writers believe. If they have creative control, and they want to preach to us some hippy save the whales (oh wait, that’s already been done) message, then that’s what it’ll be. So who knows, we’ll see. I hope this year’s Star Trek is a sign of what is to come because this movie was pretty awesome.