J.J. Abrams Talks ‘Star Wars: Episode 7′, ‘Star Trek 3′ and ‘Cloverfield 2′

Published 1 year ago by , Updated March 3rd, 2014 at 4:40 pm,

jj abrams star wars 7 trek 3 cloverfield 2 J.J. Abrams Talks Star Wars: Episode 7, Star Trek 3 and Cloverfield 2

We are but a few weeks away from Star Trek Into Darkness reaching theaters, and yet so many of the movie’s secrets have been (thankfully) kept under lock and key; hence, any attempt to wrestle information from director J.J. Abrams about his next major sci-fi genre blockbuster undertaking, Star Wars: Episode VII, is best to be considered a foolhardy endeavor, at this stage of development.

Nevertheless, that’s exactly what Playboy (needless to say, their link is NSFW) attempted during an interview with Abrams. The effort culminated with the latter serving up some intriguing, but vague, food for thought about Episode VII and what his creative philosophy is for approaching George Lucas’ operatic space epic.

However, the Star Trek/Wars director also touched on two other gestating sci-fi franchise installments: one which is, for certain, going to happen (an Into Darkness followup, a.k.a. Star Trek 3) and a sequel to the Abrams-produced giant monster found-footage movie Cloverfield, which shall henceforth be called just Cloverfield 2.

First, here’s what Abrams said about the challenge of tackling Star Wars, as a self-admitted fan:

“Here’s the thing. I try to approach a project from what it’s asking. What does it need to be? What is it demanding? With Star Wars, one has to take into account what has preceded it, what worked, what didn’t. There are cautionary tales for anything you take on that has a legacy—things you look at and think, I want to avoid this or that, or I want to do more of something. But even that feels like an outside-in approach, and it’s not how I work. For me, the key is when you have a script; it’s telling you what it wants to be.”

Indeed, what hasn’t worked for Star Wars in the past – many fans would argue the majority of artistic choice on the prequel trilogy fall into that category (along with the winter holiday special) – now lives in infamy. That is probably a big part of the reason why Lucasfilm president and Episode VII producer Kathleen Kennedy had to spend a month coaxing Abrams to accept the director job.

disney lucasfilm star wars 7 J.J. Abrams Talks Star Wars: Episode 7, Star Trek 3 and Cloverfield 2

However, with Oscar-winner Michael Arndt (Toy Story 3) writing the Episode VII screenplay and Lucas on hand to consult as necessary, Abrams has good reason to be confident that his Star Wars movie can rank among the best (or, at the least, better) installments in the franchise; not to mention, stand apart from his rebooted Star Trek universe, in terms of thematics qualities and visual design:

“As with anything, because ['Star Trek' and 'Star Wars'] are very different worlds, they shouldn’t feel the same aesthetically. They can’t. You’re right. But again, I don’t apply aesthetics first and fit a movie into that aesthetic. If I had come into Star Trek with those eyes, I would probably have been paralyzed. The advantage here is that we still have George Lucas with us to go to and ask questions and get his feedback on things, which I certainly will do. With Star Trek it was harder because I wasn’t a Star Trek fan; I didn’t have the same emotional feeling, and I didn’t have Gene Roddenberry to go to. But I came to understand the world of Star Trek, and I appreciated what fans felt and believed about this universe and this franchise.”

On that note: Paramount, after Abrams was officially confirmed to direct Star Wars: Episode VII, refused to rule out the possibility that the filmmaker could direct Star Trek 3, in addition to producing the threequel. However, since then, producer Bryan Burk has made it known that a 2016 release date is desirable, in order to coincide with the original Star Trek TV series’ 50th anniversary.

JJ Abrams on Star Trek set J.J. Abrams Talks Star Wars: Episode 7, Star Trek 3 and Cloverfield 2

Star Wars: Episode VII is tentatively scheduled to reach theaters by Summer 2015, which would make it, in essence, impossible for Abrams to make that blockbuster and then have Star Trek 3 ready a year later (as a director on both films, anyway). Nonetheless, Abrams is likewise refusing to rule out the idea:

“No. I would say it’s a possibility. We’re trying to figure out the next step. But it’s like anything: It all begins with the story.”

The same holds true for Cloverfield 2, which Abrams and director Matt Reeves have talked about on-and-off about for around five years now. However, with director Guillermo del Toro releasing Pacific Rim in theaters during the summer – followed by director Gareth Edwards rebooting Godzilla next year – there’s very much wisdom in Abrams’ claim that now just isn’t the right time for a Cloverfield sequel:

“Part of me just wants to let ['Cloverfield 2'] go, though we’ve had a couple of discussions about cool ways to do it. I’m looking forward to seeing Pacific Rim this summer. It feels like there are some really big monsters coming down the pike that could inspire something we do.”

One massive genre blockbuster at a time, right?

——

Star Trek Into Darkness opens in select (U.S.) theaters in 3D/IMAX on May 15th, 2013. It begins a regular theatrical release on May 17th.

Star Wars: Episode VII opens in theaters in Summer 2015.

Source: Playboy [via /Film]

Get our free email alerts on the topics and author of this article:
TAGS: cloverfield, cloverfield 2, star trek, star trek 3, star trek into darkness, star wars

75 Comments

Post a Comment

GravatarWant to change your avatar?
Go to Gravatar.com and upload your own (we'll wait)!

 Rules: No profanity or personal attacks.
 Use a valid email address or risk being banned from commenting.


If your comment doesn't show up immediately, it may have been flagged for moderation. Please try refreshing the page first, then drop us a note and we'll retrieve it.

  1. Really hoping Khan has nothing to do with this movie. If they show Khan, I will stand up and walk out of the theater. You do not disrespect Gene Roddenberry’s work like that. It is ridiculous that this is an action thriller, that is not Star Trek. And it’s stupid for them to call this similar to Dark Knight, Abrams is not talented by far for that as his work proves, i.e. Cloverfield (Blair Witch Project 2 is right). God helps us with Star Wars 7, which is a bad idea to begin with, and adding the original actors (who are ancient), Disney running it, and Kathleen Kennedy in charge (part responsible for Indiana Jones 4 disgrace), Star Wars will be ruined (like the dialogue in the last trilogy).

    • You are a disgrace troll.

    • SPOILERS……

      did you walk out?

  2. Star-Trek has Khan again? This fellow sure gets used alot. T.V. 1967, Movie 1982 and now 2013 movie. Writers must really like this bad guy. lol

  3. I for one was quite pleased with both the new Star Treks even though I was concerned about the drastic changes in the timeline etc. Abrams delivered an exciting new vision with just the right amount of change in the characters to account for changes in their personal histories.
    As for Star Wars, I am looking forward to what I hope will be a grittier more intense story. I have been a big fan of the Star Wars sagas have read over 100 of the books published in the ongoing mythology. There is a lot of material out there for Abrams to utilize in the new saga and I am looking forward to seeing his vision on the big screen!

  4. I can’t say that there is wisdom in holding off on a Cloverfield sequel unless they can find either a 10th anniversary reason for its creation, or fall to believing other people’s projects are good enough reason not to further explore the world Cloverfield set up. If he really just doesn’t want to do it, just say it . . unless he’s secretly working on it . . but the more time that goes by, the less it helps the case for its creation.