Comments on: Cameron Talks Avatar Trilogy With Entertainment Weekly

By: Court

Court — Thu, 27 May 2010 14:36:29 +0000

Did anyone else notice the parallels of Avatar and Dances With Wolves? It’s a futuristic Dances With Wolves in my opinion which was a great movie. I could call pretty much the rest of the movie once you could see the attaction between Jake and Neytiri. Doesn’t make it bad though. I still really enjoyed the movie and thought it was an interesting step in a new direction when it comes to cinema. I’m not really sure where the trilogy will lead but I am curious to find out.

By: Marc

Marc — Thu, 21 Jan 2010 08:38:41 +0000

Sounds ok I guess, as long as Cameron leaves out the lame political references aka
“shock and awe” and “pre-emptive attack”.

By: Marc

Marc — Thu, 21 Jan 2010 01:38:41 +0000

Sounds ok I guess, as long as Cameron leaves out the lame political references aka
“shock and awe” and “pre-emptive attack”.

By: tasouli

tasouli — Tue, 19 Jan 2010 12:21:01 +0000

I dont really see a sequel being a good idea from the story's point of view. I just saw the film this Sunday and I have to say to my surprise I really enjoyed it. Special effects aside ( which WERE great) the storyline was excellent and there was a lot of passion in the movie. The way the movie ended I think is ideal and it does not warrant a sequel. A sequel, to me at least, would be dragging on the film. Some things are clearly better left to the imagination. Jake Sully is now no longer a human and that relation to humanity that we had in the first film will no longer be present. Much like in the Matrix once Neo became “the one” there really was nowhere left to go from there, the franchise should have ended after the first film. Instead we got two sequels and I, along with many others, now loath a franchise we once loved. Hate to see that happen here….but I am sure it will

By: Fenix

Fenix — Tue, 19 Jan 2010 04:56:52 +0000

I'm with sam beckett on this one. I have a feeling Cameron is going to bring something new the table like he did with Aliens. The question is how is he going to flip things on their side? I would naturally say they (the marines) come back with a much larger force but that just seems way too cliche. I think its possible he might introduce a new kind of threat other than humans.. i dunno maybe another humanoid species that are more advanced than humans.. Could make things more interesting. Also he could go for an edgier look with deeper character development. Just a little food for thought

By: sezo

sezo — Tue, 19 Jan 2010 00:00:37 +0000

Finally someone with sense.Visual effects were great,but people talk about it as if he has cured cancer.He should think about re-doing Piranha 2!

By: DrSamBeckett

DrSamBeckett — Mon, 18 Jan 2010 08:26:22 +0000

Considering the way Cameron approaches sequels, he likes to use the original as a base and then flip it in a totally new direction, which surely is the point of a sequel in the first place, but maybe he will have the Na'vi portrayed in a more villainous light for some reason.

By: dayofwrath

dayofwrath — Mon, 18 Jan 2010 06:30:40 +0000

On that Day and it is near some people are going to curse the day that their mothers bring them to the world.To James Cameron it would be better for you if a millstone were hung around your neck and you were thrown into the sea.
dayofwrath

By: aznman

aznman — Mon, 18 Jan 2010 01:06:28 +0000

And Aliens….

By: Motorbikesarelife

Motorbikesarelife — Sat, 16 Jan 2010 08:01:02 +0000

its almost 500 years into the future or sumthing and humans still havent learned that we cant just stroll in and take what ever we want from other people students get taught this and the message still has not got across

By: Manarg

Manarg — Fri, 15 Jan 2010 20:25:08 +0000

Oh yeah one more thing, you are friggin nuts. It has been a while since I have seen an illuminati crackpot. I got news for you the illuminati is not a secret underground conspiracy. The modern Illuminati would be the heads of huge corperations that manage control on the political level. And yes Avatars tree hugging message of save the environment is very satanic lol.

By: Manarg

Manarg — Fri, 15 Jan 2010 20:18:57 +0000

Close but no cigar, avatars are vehicles of the gods. They predate christianity. For instance Avatars appear in both Hindu and Norse religions.

By: Ben R

Ben R — Fri, 15 Jan 2010 18:31:35 +0000

@ twistedburton

True it's hard to see where Cameron would go with a sequel but you really have to look at his track record with sequels (i.e. Terminator 2 and Aliens). In both cases, especially the latter, it seemed like there wasn't much to build off of for a sequel but Cameron still managed to flip both movies around and IMO exceed the first. That said, I have a feeling Cameron already knows exactly what he wants to do for the next Avatar.

By: joshi38

joshi38 — Fri, 15 Jan 2010 16:17:40 +0000

The only way I can really respond to that is via prayer.

“Dear God. I would like to file a bug report.”

By: Karen

Karen — Fri, 15 Jan 2010 15:05:17 +0000

http://rikijo.blogspot.com

The occultic meaning of the word "Avatar" is really Lucifer/Satan. -That alone should have raised eyebrows, but it didn't lol
-Think about that for a minute..what would happen if James Cameron just named the film -SATAN- ...would people then want to consider the real meaning behind the film?

The entire Movie/Entertainment industry is a well financed satanic psychological war operation being executed upon the public right before their eyes.

Just like all the other Illuminati controlled industry, the Movie/Entertainment industry is a tool designed to advance their agenda of a "New World Order" and the deceptions that come along with it.

In the satanic Illuminati occult dogma, the term "AVATAR" represents their coming Anti-christ, and is the Illuminati occult representation of Satan incarnate.

http://rikijo.blogspot.com

By: twistedburton

twistedburton — Fri, 15 Jan 2010 14:09:28 +0000

I've said it before and I will gladly say it again… I did not like “Avatar”. The effects were awesome blah blah blah, but other than that? The story was nothing new, original, or interesting. There was literally an hour where nothing of importance occurred in the film. As of now I won't see a sequel, because how would they make a sequel?

SPOILERS
The main villain is dead, Jake is a Na'vi, Grace is dead, and the Americans just left… So… We see Jake and Neytiri just wander around Pandora so Cameron can showcase some pretty pictures? No thank you. I'll pass on this one, but if it's a huge hit when it gets released (which it most likely will be) then I may as well see it so I can have an opinion on it.

By: Hersh

Hersh — Fri, 15 Jan 2010 12:55:10 +0000

Avatar has been James Cameron's favourite script for a decade and a half! He waited patiently for it to become feasible. There is no way in hell he is going to let others direct the sequels. This is HIS Star Wars(original trilogy)!

By: neontiger21

neontiger21 — Thu, 14 Jan 2010 21:45:38 +0000

I don't understand why people keep saying it's probably unlikely Cameron would direct. Why wouldn't he if he's passionate about it and has already planned out everything? And after his Terminator franchise got ruined after he left.

By: Mandarr

Mandarr — Thu, 14 Jan 2010 20:43:23 +0000

I'd much prefer an Avatar sequel to ANY Transformers sequel lol.

By: joshi38

joshi38 — Thu, 14 Jan 2010 20:36:12 +0000

You mean the catalogue that includes Terminator 2?