• I recall Premiere magazine's interviews (featured/cover stories) were usually fluff. Interview-wise, I liked the old Cinescape magazine. I loved that one.

    Let's see what Avatar does.

    heath
  • Sean C
    I gotta say, but Star Wars is not Science Fiction. It's entirely fantasy. Cameron needs to get a dictionary. Sci-Fi is taking Science, imagining what could be done, and then creating a world where it has been done. It's essentially imagining our world as it could be if Science were to go in a certain direction, and examine the repercussions of those decisions.

    Star Wars falls under Fantasy, it is about as much Science Fiction as the Lord of the Rings.
  • LeeAnna
    Thanks for someone realizing that Star Wars is not pure sci-fi. It is fantasy and is thus more comparable to LotR than to Star Trek.

    As for his comments on Titanic, I agree that I might respect him more because the movie's story is very run-of-the mill, and Avatar's seems that way as well. The graphics and sets may be amazing, but I'm going to have to see how he twists such a cliche message on imperialism and resource stripping. To be honest, I really am not that excited for Avatar.
  • Peter
    mmm, Nope Star Wars is Science Fiction. Has Robots, Space Ships and Gadgets that don't exists but perhaps could. If you find the inclusion of religion in Star Wars as means of redefining it as Fantasy I'd point you to Dune (the Book) and then if you quibble about the Force I'd have to say that any number of Science Fiction stories have people with ESP, TK and all manner of other psychic abilites(CatPaws and Many Coloured Land spring to mind, but I sure there are many otehrs), not that far different than the force if you ask me.

    Now its not exactly Asimov's brand of Scfi, more Space Opera than hard sf, but its still scifi, Fantasy has Dragons and Wizards ;) Now I won't disagree that you could rewrite Star Wars as a Fantasy, removing the Space Ships and Robots and dropping in Wizards, Dragons and amusing halflings, and some of the best sci fi can't.
  • John "Kahless" Taylor
    Star Wars isn't sci-fi? I must have seen a different movie. If you mean the Force making it fantasy, I would say it too is sci-fi. The prequels explained that the Force is just a bunch of particles, and the more of these particles you have, the stronger your ability. If this makes SW fantasy, then Star Trek is also fantasy as it has creatures who can do just as much as the Jedi, and some who would be considered gods.
  • Sean C
    Star Wars, to me, is more Space Opera. Yes, it is a derivative of Science Fiction, but it is not SciFi in the true, traditional sense. I mean, they don't hail from Planet Earth or our universe, and different species regularly live side by side, without blinking.

    Science Fiction, for the most part, hails from the idea that a world or setting exists which has evolved from the advancement of Science, leading to certain profound statements about the human condition (for example, RoboCop, among other questions asked, does ask us how much of a person needs to exist in order to be human? What I mean is, with all the machinery and technology within Robocop, his brain is the only part that is organic. Is he therefore still human?). Gattaca looked at the repurcussions of cloning and the idea of perfect kids, then showing the prejudice of those whose parents could not afford to genetically engineer them, and not allowed to advance in the world despite their talents and intelligence.
    Good science fiction should set out to ask those exact questions.

    "Robots, Gadgets and so on" does not count as Sci Fi. James Bond is hardly Sci Fi, nor is Rocky 4, but both have robots and gadgets.
  • the_old_man
    Oh man, do I even want to be here??? No wonder these genre's get no respect, even the fans can't get it right... :( :( :(
blog comments powered by Disqus