• dafadge
    Were Doomed!
  • OrangeRush2112
    only time will tell.......tick....tick.....tick
  • EngraverKev
    If Buddy Hackett was in charge none of this would have ever happened.
  • Andy S
    As long as the movie is still good, it really doesn't matter who releases it. However, with FOX in charge, the chances of it being good have gone down. Let's hope they don't turn Bond into Austin Powers.
  • dafadge
    Nah it could be fine, I assume fox will take this franchise seriously I'm not really much of a fan (dispite bieng scottish) I mean thers alot of cheese in some of those films But I liked the idea of the "No nonsence approach" even though Quantom of solace was terrible..ow it so was, but regardless I hope they keep to the format i.e no silly gadgets please
  • M-Cat
    Great. Ruin the franchise by letting fox take over. Sheesh
  • DrSamBeckett
    It cannot in any way hurt this franchise, which started up again with noble aims in Casino Royale, and then flushed our brains down the toilet in Quantum Of Solace. Which was incidentally the worst Bond film ever made! In all honesty, this has no real impact on Bond at all.

    No need for any fuss whatsoever. Sony are responsible for Bond, they wouldnt want all of their product range in a bad movie would they????
  • rich
    maybe it should "affect a thing" lol, the second one was a let down in my opinion to a great Royale.
  • Gary
    Nah.
    its just a distribution/marketing deal
    Sony hasent given up creative control.
  • Hammie111
    @ dafadge

    No gadgets? It's a Bond movie it needs the gadgets to make it great. The best part of any bond movie was Q, until he died. John Cleese just couldn't fill Desmond Llewelyn so they cut him from the 'more serious' films.
  • Kantstandya
    damit
  • Lord garth, Formerly of Izar
    Hot Fox News chix as Bond girls!!
  • dafadge
    @Hammie

    hmm its just my opinion but the gadgets got well silly and dumb especially as the series went on I really prefered the no nonesence serious approach and still do
  • Huggybear
    I dislike the new, "realistic" Bond films. If i want realism, i'll look at the wall in my room. Soooooooo reaaaal!

    I need Bond with over the top gadgets and absurdly eeeevil villains.
  • Lord garth, Formerly of Izar
    The problem wasn't the gadgets. The problem is and was the era of hollywood and their utter lack of restaint with respect to anything and their a-hole all or nothing attitude with everything they do. Some gadgets used cleverly and in an intersting way are brilliant. All gadgets, all over the top CGI done all the time, in a cartoonish and childish was is grotesque and dumb as F--k!!
  • Josh Rose
    Quantum of Solace was NOT the worst Bond film, guys. Seriously now, that goes to Moonraker.

    Solace was also considerably better than ALL of Roger Moore's films, and the oh-so-terrible Die Another Day.

    Fact is, while Brosnan's era did have some pretty goofy gadgets, they weren't anywhere near as awful as Moore's. I wouldn't mind if they bring in some gadgets to the Craig films, as long as they keep them at least somewhat grounded, like in the early Connery films, Dalton's two, and Goldeneye.

    As for this Fox debacle. As long as they have no creative control, which is what this article is saying, I think, then I have no problem with it.
  • Ken J
    Fox is only handling marketing and distribution... how will that affect the actual movie??? Something tells me that there's a bigger reason why Fox gets such a bad rep. Sure they have plenty of horrible movies, but they also have plenty of really great movies under their belt. So how is that any different from any other studio? I think part of it has been their handling of comic book movies. Since a lot of the people here on this site are comic book movie fans, that is a major factor as to our collective opinions of Fox...But in general, they seem just like any other movie studio, I see good and bad movies coming out of all of them...
  • Doug Barry
    Not a big fan of Fox movies after what they did to Watchmen.
  • the old man
    Umm, this might not happen...
  • Ken J
    @Joshi

    Like Firefly... Oh well, why didn't they make a comic book series or something so we would know how that whole psychic ability thing of hers would pan out?? I'm so curious as to where that show would have went if it had continued... Sorry to sound like a girl, but I've always wondered if Kaylee and Jayne would ever have anything together despite the whole Kaylee and Doctor thing...
  • Ken J
    Yah, but I just felt that Jayne was real sincere with his feelings for her, you could see it in how he would protect her, even when she didn't want him to. With Simon he just seemed like the "charming guy" picking out the cute single chick to hit on... but I guess in a way, they kind of have a big brother little sister relationship, but sometimes it seems more than that, well, at least from Jayne...
  • Fox do like to bugger stuff up and they are run by a complete and utter mentalist. This would not be good for Bond in any way, shape or form.
  • Ken J
    @Joshi

    But that's exactly what I mean, he didn't even care until it was apparent that she was available, it seems more like a love out of convenience more than anything else. Jayne seems to put a lot of effort into trying to keep Kaylee safe... But I don't know, perhaps I got it right the first time and they have a brother/sister relationship, but either way, I didn't like Simon for her, there's something self-serving about him, and she's far too cute and sweet for that... lol
  • Ken J
    Eh, I guess I just identify myself more with Jayne (except for where he backstabs them in the series, lol) than Simon. lol
  • Alan
    Bring back the gadgets, bring nback Q and this time Miss moneypenny should be so beautiful Bond should be the one who gets teased out of his mind.
blog comments powered by Disqus