‘Inside Job’ Review

Published 5 years ago by , Updated March 3rd, 2014 at 6:44 am,

inside job spitzer Inside Job Review

The “characters” that Ferguson features in his documentary are by far the most interesting and engaging aspect of the film. That “cast” includes:

  • Multiple economists ranging from those who have been warning for years about the dangerous practices of Wall Street, to those who have been downplaying that danger.
  • Bankers/Traders – both the moral and immoral types.
  • Government officials who have direct ties to the financial sector.
  • Educators from top universities who are involved (often unethically) with the financial sector.
  • Advocates of social reform and justice.
  • Foreign economists/government officials who have mapped the ripple effect of Wall Street malpractice.
  • A psychotherapist who treats Wall Street execs and the escorts who service them.
  • A madam whose primary clientele was Wall Street execs.

Truly, some of Inside Job‘s best moments come from the unexpected detours Ferguson takes into the psychology and seedy private behavior of high-ranking Wall Street types. A definite pattern quickly emerges in which the same people who are thrilled by high-stakes investing and ludicrous greed are equally thrilled by money, drugs and prostitutes, often at taxpayer expense. The two worlds – financial services and illicit vice – seemingly go hand-in-hand.

inside job madam Inside Job Review

Another big revelation of this film: some of the people responsible for the “academic stamp of approval” that legitimizes many fraudulent reports published by Wall Street are the same people heading up America’s leading business schools today (Yale, Harvard, Columbia, etc…). In fact, Ferguson’s interviews with two of these esteemed academic names about their obvious unethical behavior are so damning that I’m not sure the two men will keep their jobs should this film gain notoriety. It’s a clear case of journalistic victory, captured on camera.

If I have to criticize Inside Job it has to be on two points: first, there is a ton of material that Ferguson presents, but a lot of the social impact is only discussed superficially. Of course, looking at every ripple caused by the global financial crisis of 2008 would result in a three to four-hour documentary, and admittedly Ferguson is wiser to stay tightly focused on his primary subject (the financial services sector). But despite offering viewers a concise narrative, you can’t watch Inside Job without getting the nagging feeling that there’s much more going on that ties into what Ferguson is discussing; not getting that correlating info can be a bit frustrating at times.

The same goes for the lack of commentary from many of the major players (top CEOs turned government officials) being discussed int the film. While Ferguson does manage to get commentary from an impressive array of specialists, not having some of the top dogs on record robs the film of being an indisputably objective and complete look at this subject.

Matt Damon Hereafter trailer Inside Job Review

The second criticism I have is with Ferguson’s choice of narrator for the film: actor Matt Damon. Sure, Damon’s voice will be a welcome guide for many viewers, but having a well-known actor with pronounced liberal views speaking for what is essentially a non-partisan film is a misstep, in my opinion. Damon’s presence will give easily-swayed or politically fundamental viewers an excuse to slap this film with the label of “liberal propaganda” based on that celebrity association alone, and this film is far from being partisan in any way.

Those small criticisms aside, Inside Job is an accomplishment that does what a great documentary should: present an important societal topic in a way that is accessible and comprehensive to a mainstream audience. And, as the film states in its final moments, the continuing malpractices of Wall Street are a crime for which few have been punished, but damage of which continues to threaten our very way of life. We’ve been officially warned.

Watch the trailer for Inside Job to help you make up your mind:

Our Rating:

4.5 out of 5

« 1 2

Get our free email alerts on the topics and author of this article:


Post a Comment

GravatarWant to change your avatar?
Go to Gravatar.com and upload your own (we'll wait)!

 Rules: No profanity or personal attacks.
 Use a valid email address or risk being banned from commenting.

If your comment doesn't show up immediately, it may have been flagged for moderation. Please try refreshing the page first, then drop us a note and we'll retrieve it. Keep in mind that we do not allow external links in the comments.

  1. @ Kofi

    C.R.E.A.M., most these people only cared about gettin their dolla billz yall…….. ahhh Wu-Tang FTW.

    You may have opened a can of politacl worms here with this review Kofie :|. Prepare yourself


      • @ Kofi

        This seems like it would make a nice DVD rental to sit down and watch. I’ll add it to the blockbuster que.

  2. @ Kofi: I never heard of this film. I will have to check it out based on your review. Thanks for the heads up.

  3. Thank you for writing this Kofi, and thank you ScreenRant, for caring enough to push this forward. The only way to recover from the deciet and recklessness of those who live off of we “little folks” is to shove them into the spot light so that they are held accountable and left to be viewed as prime examples of how past “empires” have fallen. I write fictional pieces that often are wrapped around historically acurate circumstances. The Toltecs, The Romans, The Egyptians…all of these great societies left behind monuments that have stood the test of time, yet where are they now? They fell prey to the same behavior on the part of those who governed them and ultimately perished. If the decline in leadership and accountability to those who are most affected by their actions doesn’t come soon, I weep for the future. Skyscrapers, Bridges, and monuments like Mount Rushmore that will be viewed as the fingerprints of a bypassed society that devoured itself.

  4. Awesome… finally a documentary that it seems gets to the nuts and bolts as opposed to simply pointing fingers at a particular political philosophy (whichever side that may be).

  5. @Kofi

    Thanks for highlighting this documentary.

    I find it interesting how a lot of what these people interviewed in the trailer who are not for the scam that Wall Street pulled on us are in fact saying a lot of what has been labeled in recent years as conspiracy talk. For example that we have basically a Wall Street run government. Often I would hear comments to the affect of , “naahh thats just crazy conspiracy talk, if that were happening someone would say something”. And yet here we are. I for one am glad that Americans are waking up to the scam thats being going for many years now.

    I did not see any release info like dates; do you know when this will released?

  6. It misses some detail and has some pretty big flaws in it. I wouldn’t call it non-partisan.

    Still leaps and bounds ahead of anything Micheal Moore crap. That guy is probably the biggest idiot I’ve ever seen trying to make documentaries.

  7. Saw it Saturday night. Two thumbs up! A must see for everyone.

    Unfortunately you’ll find out that the wealth and power of top financial firms have grow too large to stop. They hold all important financial positions in the government, own the rating agencies (fees), own Congress (lobbyists and contributions). For good measure, they even own the college economic and business professors (consulting fees).

    Obama can’t stop it. No one can. It’s the golden rule. Game over.

  8. I’ve been saying it for a long time now “It’s all about the money.” Cliché, but so dang true and such a shame. Read “The Man That Corrupted Hadleyburg” the other day. Ripe for a remake, I’d say…

  9. It misses a whole class of villain: the homedebtors who took out mortgages they couldn’t possible every pay back (and in most cases lied to get the mortgage). And it ignores the trillions of dollars in handouts given to these scamsters in the form of debt forgiveness, and not collecting income tax on forgiven debt.

  10. As I watched this film i noticed how angry I got to the point of imagining doing violence to these economists and securities manipulators. It’s a wonder that no one has been prosecuted.